%% You should probably cite draft-ietf-anima-brski-ae-13 instead of this revision.
@techreport{ietf-anima-brski-ae-12,
    number =    {draft-ietf-anima-brski-ae-12},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-anima-brski-ae/12/},
    author =    {David von Oheimb and Steffen Fries and Hendrik Brockhaus},
    title =     {{BRSKI-AE: Alternative Enrollment Protocols in BRSKI}},
    pagetotal = 41,
    year =      2024,
    month =     jul,
    day =       5,
    abstract =  {This document defines an enhancement of Bootstrapping Remote Secure Key Infrastructure (BRSKI, RFC 8995). It supports alternative certificate enrollment protocols, such as CMP, that use authenticated self-contained signed objects for certification messages. About This Document This note is to be removed before publishing as an RFC. Status information for this document may be found at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-anima-brski-ae/. Source for this draft and an issue tracker can be found at https://github.com/anima-wg/anima-brski-ae.},
}