%% You should probably cite draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm-12 instead of this revision.
@techreport{ietf-anima-brski-prm-00,
    number =    {draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm-00},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm/00/},
    author =    {Steffen Fries and Thomas Werner and Eliot Lear and Michael Richardson},
    title =     {{BRSKI with Pledge in Responder Mode (BRSKI-PRM)}},
    pagetotal = 46,
    year =      2021,
    month =     oct,
    day =       25,
    abstract =  {This document defines enhancements to the bootstrapping a remote secure key infrastructure (BRSKI, {[}RFC8995{]} ) to facilitate bootstrapping in domains featuring no or only timely limited connectivity between a pledge and the domain registrar. This specifically targets situations, in which the interaction model changes from a pledge-initiator-mode as in BRSKI to a pledge- responder-mode as desribed here. To support this functionality BRSKI-PRM introduces a new registrar-agent component, which facilitates the communication between pledge and registrar during the bootstrapping phase. To support the establishment of a trust relation between a pledge and the domain registrar, BRSKI-PRM relies on the exchange of authenticated self-contained objects (signature- wrapped objects). The defined approach is agnostic regarding the utilized enrollment protocol, deployed by the registrar to communicate with the Domain CA.},
}