Review request
draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm

This document is getting close to WGLC, and we would appreciate early review of the three above listed directorates (security, IoT and YANG doctors) as the in our opinion most important ones.

The YANG doctor review is particularily important, because we would want to use this document as the spearhead for resolving our issue of augmenting rfc8366 YANG, and so far, the discussions we have on netmod/anima with YANG experts have not lead to a working suggestion. This problem applies to multiple ANIMA drafts intending to augment rfc8366 YANG, and if the solution is that we first need to fix up the rfc8366 YANG, e.g.: via rfc8366bis or a differently fixed version of its YANG module, then this would become a new dependency for all those doc. The authors of this draft suggested that Jan Lindblad has been helpful on these type of issues in the past already, and he might be more familiar with them than other YANG doctors.

Thank you so much
    Toerless on behalf of ANIMA (chairs).