Ballot for draft-ietf-appsawg-file-scheme
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 14 and is now closed.
I haven't heard the details of Stephen's Discuss.
I support Stephen's DISCUSS.
- I support Stephen's DISCUSS - Section 5: "Implementers MUST research" and "Care MUST be taken" both seem like requirements on people, not on implementations. Furthermore, "research" and "taking of care" are vague in terms of expected results. Can these be recast into concrete expectations of implementation behavior?
Zhoutianran <zhoutianran@huawei.com> performed the opsdir review.
I support Stephen's DISCUSS.
I also support Stephen's Discuss (which is pretty much "we need to explicitly decide whether we can live with this", as I understand it).