%% You should probably cite rfc7303 instead of this I-D. @techreport{ietf-appsawg-xml-mediatypes-01, number = {draft-ietf-appsawg-xml-mediatypes-01}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-xml-mediatypes/01/}, author = {Chris Lilley and Murata Makoto and Alexey Melnikov and Henry S. Thompson}, title = {{XML Media Types}}, pagetotal = 30, year = 2013, month = may, day = 28, abstract = {This specification standardizes three media types -- application/xml, application/xml-external-parsed-entity, and application/xml-dtd -- for use in exchanging network entities that are related to the Extensible Markup Language (XML) while defining text/xml and text/ xml-external-parsed-entity as aliases for the respective application/ types. This specification also standardizes a convention (using the suffix '+xml') for naming media types outside of these five types when those media types represent XML MIME entities. Major differences from {[}RFC3023{]} are alignment of charset handling for text/xml and text/xml-external-parsed-entity with application/ xml, the addition of XPointer and XML Base as fragment identifiers and base URIs, respectively, mention of the XPointer Registry, and updating of many references.}, }