RTP Payload Format for AC-3 Audio
draft-ietf-avt-rtp-ac3-07
Revision differences
Document history
Date | Rev. | By | Action |
---|---|---|---|
2005-07-30
|
07 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza |
2005-07-25
|
07 | Amy Vezza | IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent |
2005-07-25
|
07 | Amy Vezza | IESG has approved the document |
2005-07-25
|
07 | Amy Vezza | Closed "Approve" ballot |
2005-07-22
|
07 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza |
2005-07-22
|
07 | Amy Vezza | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Sam Hartman by Amy Vezza |
2005-07-22
|
07 | (System) | Removed from agenda for telechat - 2005-07-21 |
2005-07-21
|
07 | Bill Fenner | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Bill Fenner by Bill Fenner |
2005-07-21
|
07 | Michelle Cotton | IANA Comments: Upon approval of this document the IANA will register the following MIME Media Type: audio/ac3 |
2005-07-21
|
07 | Mark Townsley | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Mark Townsley has been changed to No Objection from Undefined by Mark Townsley |
2005-07-21
|
07 | Mark Townsley | [Ballot comment] Well done. I found only one nit, and enjoyed reading this one: Odd spacing of "Type name" and "Subtype name" in section 5.1 |
2005-07-21
|
07 | Mark Townsley | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Undefined, has been recorded for Mark Townsley by Mark Townsley |
2005-07-21
|
07 | Margaret Cullen | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Margaret Wasserman by Margaret Wasserman |
2005-07-21
|
07 | Jon Peterson | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jon Peterson by Jon Peterson |
2005-07-21
|
07 | Alex Zinin | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alex Zinin by Alex Zinin |
2005-07-21
|
07 | David Kessens | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for David Kessens by David Kessens |
2005-07-20
|
07 | Bert Wijnen | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Bert Wijnen by Bert Wijnen |
2005-07-19
|
07 | Ted Hardie | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ted Hardie by Ted Hardie |
2005-07-19
|
07 | Brian Carpenter | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Carpenter by Brian Carpenter |
2005-07-18
|
07 | Allison Mankin | State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Allison Mankin |
2005-07-18
|
07 | Scott Hollenbeck | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Scott Hollenbeck by Scott Hollenbeck |
2005-07-18
|
07 | Allison Mankin | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2005-07-21 by Allison Mankin |
2005-07-15
|
07 | (System) | State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system |
2005-07-13
|
07 | Allison Mankin | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Allison Mankin |
2005-07-13
|
07 | Allison Mankin | Ballot has been issued by Allison Mankin |
2005-07-13
|
07 | Allison Mankin | Created "Approve" ballot |
2005-07-01
|
07 | Amy Vezza | Last call sent |
2005-07-01
|
07 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza |
2005-07-01
|
07 | Allison Mankin | Last Calling in parallel with the ietf-types review because there's a deadline for this payload for the Home Networking Interoperablity Guidelines publication by the Digital … Last Calling in parallel with the ietf-types review because there's a deadline for this payload for the Home Networking Interoperablity Guidelines publication by the Digital Living Network Alliance - I haven't been given the exact date yet. |
2005-07-01
|
07 | Allison Mankin | State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation by Allison Mankin |
2005-07-01
|
07 | Allison Mankin | Last Call was requested by Allison Mankin |
2005-07-01
|
07 | (System) | Ballot writeup text was added |
2005-07-01
|
07 | (System) | Last call text was added |
2005-07-01
|
07 | (System) | Ballot approval text was added |
2005-06-30
|
07 | Allison Mankin | Sent to Chairs and Authors: I have one immediate question: the normative reference for AC3 seems inaccessible. The ATSC website mentions it in a FAQ, … Sent to Chairs and Authors: I have one immediate question: the normative reference for AC3 seems inaccessible. The ATSC website mentions it in a FAQ, but provides a copy only of Rev A from 2001, at least that I can find. This is the ref I'm looking for: [ATSC] U.S. Advanced Television Systems Committee (ATSC), "ATSC Standard: Digital Audio Compression (AC-3), Revision B," Doc A/52B, June 2005. The IESG has been concerned about this topic of normative spec availablity, so let me find out what the process has been on this one, since it's the first to have a publication request since the new discussion arose:  - was the WG able to consult this specification as needed?  - if not, what was the method for evaluating the   (normative) dependencies from it?  - one answer may be that the authors' presentation   material from the spec was an important resource -   maybe IETF proceedings viewgraphs should also   be cited normatively if the spec is not accessible |
2005-06-30
|
07 | Allison Mankin | Magnus requested ietf-types review yesterday. IETF Last Call request go out soon. |
2005-06-30
|
07 | Allison Mankin | State Changes to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Allison Mankin |
2005-06-30
|
07 | Allison Mankin | [Note]: 'PROTO shepherd: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com' added by Allison Mankin |
2005-06-30
|
07 | Allison Mankin | Secretariat not adding writeups :( Magnus's writeup: Please handle this document as quickly as possible as DLNA require it as an reference in their specification. … Secretariat not adding writeups :( Magnus's writeup: Please handle this document as quickly as possible as DLNA require it as an reference in their specification.   1.a) Have the chairs personally reviewed this version of the Internet     Draft (ID), and in particular, do they believe this ID is ready     to forward to the IESG for publication? Yes, we have reviewed it and finds it ready for publication.   1.b) Has the document had adequate review from both key WG members     and key non-WG members? Do you have any concerns about the     depth or breadth of the reviews that have been performed? The document has been reviewed by AVT members   1.c) Do you have concerns that the document needs more review from a     particular (broader) perspective (e.g., security, operational     complexity, someone familiar with AAA, etc.)? It hasn't been reviewed by ietf-types@iana.org. However this will be requested at the same time as this request is submitted.   1.d) Do you have any specific concerns/issues with this document that     you believe the ADs and/or IESG should be aware of? For     example, perhaps you are uncomfortable with certain parts of the     document, or have concerns whether there really is a need for     it. In any event, if your issues have been discussed in the WG     and the WG has indicated it that it still wishes to advance the     document, detail those concerns in the write-up. No.   1.e) How solid is the WG consensus behind this document? Does it     represent the strong concurrence of a few individuals, with     others being silent, or does the WG as a whole understand and     agree with it? There is strong consensus.   1.f) Has anyone threatened an appeal or otherwise indicated extreme     discontent? If so, please summarise the areas of conflict in     separate email to the Responsible Area Director. No   1.g) Have the chairs verified that the document adheres to all of the     ID nits? (see http://www.ietf.org/ID-Checklist.html). Yes.   1.h) Is the document split into normative and informative references?     Are there normative references to IDs, where the IDs are not     also ready for advancement or are otherwise in an unclear state?     (note here that the RFC editor will not publish an RFC with     normative references to IDs, it will delay publication until all     such IDs are also ready for publication as RFCs.) Yes. |
2005-06-29
|
07 | Dinara Suleymanova | Draft Added by Dinara Suleymanova in state Publication Requested |
2005-06-28
|
07 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-avt-rtp-ac3-07.txt |
2005-06-08
|
06 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-avt-rtp-ac3-06.txt |
2005-06-03
|
05 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-avt-rtp-ac3-05.txt |
2005-05-27
|
04 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-avt-rtp-ac3-04.txt |
2005-05-17
|
03 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-avt-rtp-ac3-03.txt |
2005-02-01
|
02 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-avt-rtp-ac3-02.txt |
2004-12-29
|
01 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-avt-rtp-ac3-01.txt |
2002-08-02
|
00 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-avt-rtp-ac3-00.txt |