RTP Payload Formats for European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI) European Standard ES 202 050, ES 202 211, and ES 202 212 Distributed Speech Recognition Encoding
draft-ietf-avt-rtp-dsr-codecs-03

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2004-11-01
 03 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza
2004-10-29
 03 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2004-10-29
 03 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2004-10-29
 03 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2004-10-27
 03 Allison Mankin State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed by Allison Mankin
2004-10-27
 03 Allison Mankin RFC Editor notes were to make ownership of MIME type IESG delegation and
take congestion control out of security considerations.
2004-10-27
 03 Allison Mankin Note field has been cleared by Allison Mankin
2004-09-17
 03 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2004-09-16
2004-09-16
 03 Amy Vezza State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza
2004-09-16
 03 Thomas Narten [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Thomas Narten by Thomas Narten
2004-09-16
 03 Bert Wijnen [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Bert Wijnen by Bert Wijnen
2004-09-16
 03 Harald Alvestrand [Ballot comment]
Reviewed by Joel Halpern, Gen-ART
2004-09-16
 03 Harald Alvestrand [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Harald Alvestrand by Harald Alvestrand
2004-09-16
 03 Alex Zinin [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alex Zinin by Alex Zinin
2004-09-16
 03 Jon Peterson [Ballot Position Update] Position for Jon Peterson has been changed to No Objection from Undefined by Jon Peterson
2004-09-16
 03 Jon Peterson
[Ballot comment]
Is congestion control a security consideration?

Also, when I read the 2nd paragraph of the Sec Cons, I was tempted to read it …
[Ballot comment]
Is congestion control a security consideration?

Also, when I read the 2nd paragraph of the Sec Cons, I was tempted to read it as a MUST-use for DCCP, or something like that. While I agree with the spirit of the statement, neither 3550 nor 3551 offer much by way of normative MUSTs for congestion control implementation. So, I'm not exactly sure what measures the authors intend to be adopted here at MUST-strength.
2004-09-16
 03 Jon Peterson [Ballot Position Update] New position, Undefined, has been recorded for Jon Peterson by Jon Peterson
2004-09-15
 03 Bill Fenner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Bill Fenner by Bill Fenner
2004-09-15
 03 David Kessens [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for David Kessens by David Kessens
2004-09-15
 03 Margaret Cullen [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Margaret Wasserman by Margaret Wasserman
2004-09-14
 03 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Russ Housley by Russ Housley
2004-09-14
 03 Ted Hardie [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ted Hardie by Ted Hardie
2004-09-10
 03 Steven Bellovin [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Steve Bellovin by Steve Bellovin
2004-09-10
 03 Scott Hollenbeck [Ballot Position Update] Position for Scott Hollenbeck has been changed to No Objection from Undefined by Scott Hollenbeck
2004-09-10
 03 Scott Hollenbeck [Ballot comment]
MIME type review request was sent on Mon Aug 9 2004.
2004-09-10
 03 Scott Hollenbeck [Ballot Position Update] New position, Undefined, has been recorded for Scott Hollenbeck by Scott Hollenbeck
2004-09-09
 03 Allison Mankin [Note]: 'RTP for distributed speech recognition was vetted by speechsc wg on occasion of RFC 3557' added by Allison Mankin
2004-09-09
 03 Allison Mankin [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Allison Mankin
2004-09-09
 03 Allison Mankin Ballot has been issued by Allison Mankin
2004-09-09
 03 Allison Mankin Created "Approve" ballot
2004-09-09
 03 Allison Mankin [Note]: 'RTP for distributed speech was vetted by speechsc wg on occasion of RFC 3557' added by Allison Mankin
2004-09-09
 03 Allison Mankin Placed on agenda for telechat - 2004-09-16 by Allison Mankin
2004-09-09
 03 Allison Mankin State Changes to IESG Evaluation from In Last Call by Allison Mankin
2004-08-26
 03 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2004-08-26
 03 Amy Vezza State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2004-08-26
 03 Allison Mankin
As used by the Apps ADs for their current MIME review process,
the ietf-types list saw the registrations in this document for the
past two+ …
As used by the Apps ADs for their current MIME review process,
the ietf-types list saw the registrations in this document for the
past two+ weeks (Scott Hollenbeck sent the notice to the list).
There were no comments on the registrations.
2004-08-26
 03 Allison Mankin State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation by Allison Mankin
2004-08-26
 03 Allison Mankin Last Call was requested by Allison Mankin
2004-08-26
 03 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2004-08-26
 03 (System) Last call text was added
2004-08-26
 03 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2004-07-16
 03 Allison Mankin State Changes to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Allison Mankin
2004-06-28
 03 Dinara Suleymanova Draft Added by Dinara Suleymanova in state Publication Requested
2004-06-18
 03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-avt-rtp-dsr-codecs-03.txt
2004-06-01
 02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-avt-rtp-dsr-codecs-02.txt
2004-04-14
 01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-avt-rtp-dsr-codecs-01.txt
2004-02-09
 00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-avt-rtp-dsr-codecs-00.txt