RTP Payload Format for mU-law EMbedded Codec for Low-delay IP Communication (UEMCLIP) Speech Codec
draft-ietf-avt-rtp-uemclip-06
Yes
(Cullen Jennings)
No Objection
(Chris Newman)
(Dan Romascanu)
(David Ward)
(Jon Peterson)
(Lars Eggert)
(Lisa Dusseault)
(Magnus Westerlund)
(Mark Townsley)
(Pasi Eronen)
(Ron Bonica)
(Ross Callon)
(Russ Housley)
(Tim Polk)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 06 and is now closed.
Cullen Jennings Former IESG member
(was Discuss, Yes)
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2009-04-03)
Unknown
Clearing my Discuss, but I *really* would appreciate the inclusion of a reference to G.711 and UEMCLIP in this document.
Alexey Melnikov Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2009-03-27)
Unknown
I agree with comments by Tim Polk.
Chris Newman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Dan Romascanu Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
David Ward Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2008-05-21)
Unknown
The legend URL is currently non-existent. It should be created when the document is approved.
Jon Peterson Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Lars Eggert Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Lisa Dusseault Former IESG member
(was No Record, No Objection, No Record, No Objection)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Magnus Westerlund Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2009-05-13)
Unknown
Mark Townsley Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Pasi Eronen Former IESG member
(was Abstain)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ross Callon Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Tim Polk Former IESG member
(was No Record, Discuss, No Objection)
No Objection
No Objection
(2009-02-25)
Unknown
The final clause of the first sentence doesn't quite parse: "This implies that confidentiality of the media streams is achieved by encryption by other means." Perhaps the following would be clearer? "This implies that confidentiality of the media streams is achieved by encryption unless the applicable profile specifies other means." Magnus Nystrom's secdir review included the following suggestion for the security considerations section: > The security consideration section notes the risk of memory attacks due to illegal layer > indices etc. Maybe it could also be pointed out that decoders could be configured to > reject layer indices etc. that are outside of some specified policy?