Skip to main content

RTP Payload Format for Video Codec 1 (VC-1)
draft-ietf-avt-rtp-vc1-06

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2006-02-08
06 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza
2006-02-06
06 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2006-02-06
06 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2006-02-06
06 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2006-02-03
06 Amy Vezza State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Amy Vezza
2006-02-03
06 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2006-02-02
2006-02-02
06 Alex Zinin [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alex Zinin by Alex Zinin
2006-02-02
06 Bill Fenner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Bill Fenner by Bill Fenner
2006-02-02
06 Bert Wijnen [Ballot Position Update] Position for Bert Wijnen has been changed to No Objection from Undefined by Bert Wijnen
2006-02-02
06 Bert Wijnen [Ballot Position Update] New position, Undefined, has been recorded for Bert Wijnen by Bert Wijnen
2006-02-01
06 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system
2006-02-01
06 David Kessens [Ballot Position Update] Position for David Kessens has been changed to No Objection from Undefined by David Kessens
2006-02-01
06 David Kessens [Ballot Position Update] New position, Undefined, has been recorded for David Kessens by David Kessens
2006-02-01
06 Michelle Cotton IANA Last Call Comments:
Upon approval of this document the IANA will register the media type "video/vc1" and the associated RTP payload format.
2006-01-31
06 Russ Housley
[Ballot comment]
The Security Considerations say:
  >
  > RTP packets using the payload format defined in this specification
  > are subject to …
[Ballot comment]
The Security Considerations say:
  >
  > RTP packets using the payload format defined in this specification
  > are subject to the security considerations discussed in the RTP
  > specification [4], and in any appropriate RTP profile.  This implies
  > that confidentiality of the media streams is achieved by encryption;
  > for example, through the application of SRTP [11]. 
  >
  This is good.  I would like to see this expanded to cover integrity
  as well as confidentiality.
2006-01-31
06 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Russ Housley by Russ Housley
2006-01-31
06 Scott Hollenbeck [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Scott Hollenbeck by Scott Hollenbeck
2006-01-31
06 Ted Hardie
[Ballot comment]
omment:

The document says:
   
  Note that the appropriate mechanism to ensure confidentiality and
  integrity of RTP packets and their …
[Ballot comment]
omment:

The document says:
   
  Note that the appropriate mechanism to ensure confidentiality and
  integrity of RTP packets and their payloads is very dependent on the
  application and on the transport and signaling protocols employed.
  Thus, although SRTP is given as an example above, other possible
  choices exist.
   

This would be more useful with a pointer to at least one other example
and/or a discussion of the application issues which vary the means by
which confidentiality and integrity are assured.
2006-01-31
06 Ted Hardie [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ted Hardie by Ted Hardie
2006-01-27
06 Brian Carpenter [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Carpenter by Brian Carpenter
2006-01-26
06 Allison Mankin Placed on agenda for telechat - 2006-02-02 by Allison Mankin
2006-01-24
06 Allison Mankin request for ietf-types review, Jan 4

http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/ietf-types/2006-January/001651.html
2006-01-24
06 Allison Mankin request for ietf-types review, Jan 4

http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/ietf-types/2006-January/001651.html
2006-01-24
06 Allison Mankin [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Allison Mankin
2006-01-24
06 Allison Mankin Ballot has been issued by Allison Mankin
2006-01-24
06 Allison Mankin Created "Approve" ballot
2006-01-18
06 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2006-01-18
06 Amy Vezza State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2006-01-18
06 Allison Mankin State Change Notice email list have been change to csp@csperkins.org, magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com, Anders.Klemets@microsoft.com from csp@csperkins.org, magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com
2006-01-18
06 Allison Mankin [Note]: 'PROTO shepherd Colin Perkins csp@csperkins.org' added by Allison Mankin
2006-01-18
06 Allison Mankin Last Call was requested by Allison Mankin
2006-01-18
06 Allison Mankin State Changes to Last Call Requested from Publication Requested by Allison Mankin
2006-01-18
06 Allison Mankin Reviewed carefully over last few days.  Spec available,
congestion control careful, ietf-types review fine. 
ETSI requirement for publication by Feb 28.
2006-01-18
06 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2006-01-18
06 (System) Last call text was added
2006-01-18
06 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2006-01-12
06 Dinara Suleymanova Draft Added by Dinara Suleymanova in state Publication Requested
2006-01-11
06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-avt-rtp-vc1-06.txt
2006-01-03
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-avt-rtp-vc1-05.txt
2005-12-14
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-avt-rtp-vc1-04.txt
2005-12-13
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-avt-rtp-vc1-03.txt
2005-12-09
(System) Posted related IPR disclosure: Microsoft's Statement about IPR claimed in draft-ietf-avt-rtp-vc1-02.txt
2005-11-30
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-avt-rtp-vc1-02.txt
2005-11-10
(System) Posted related IPR disclosure: Microsoft's Statement about IPR claimed in draft-ietf-avt-rtp-vc1-01.txt
2005-10-17
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-avt-rtp-vc1-01.txt
2005-08-25
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-avt-rtp-vc1-00.txt