RTP and Leap Seconds
draft-ietf-avtcore-leap-second-06
AVTCore K. Gross
Internet-Draft AVA Networks
Updates: 3550 (if approved) R. van Brandenburg
Intended status: Standards Track TNO
Expires: May 19, 2014 November 15, 2013
RTP and Leap Seconds
draft-ietf-avtcore-leap-second-06
Abstract
This document discusses issues that arise when RTP sessions span
Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) leap seconds. It updates RFC 3550
to describe how RTP senders and receivers should behave in the
presence of leap seconds.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on May 19, 2014.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2013 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Gross & van Brandenburg Expires May 19, 2014 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft RTP Leap Seconds November 2013
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
3. Leap seconds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
3.1. UTC behavior during positive leap second . . . . . . . . 3
3.2. NTP behavior during positive leap second . . . . . . . . 3
3.3. POSIX behavior during positive leap second . . . . . . . 3
3.4. Example of leap-second behaviors . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
4. Receiver behavior during leap second . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
5. Recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
5.1. RTP Sender Reports . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
5.2. RTP Packet Playout . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
6. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
7. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
8. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
9. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
9.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
9.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
1. Introduction
In some media networking applications, RTP streams are referenced to
a wall-clock time (absolute date and time). This is accomplished
through use of the NTP timestamp field in the RTCP sender report (SR)
to create a mapping between RTP timestamps and the wall clock. When
a wall-clock reference is used, the playout time for RTP packets is
referenced to the wall clock. Smooth and continuous media playout
requires a smooth and continuous time base. The time base used by
the wall clock may include leap seconds which are not rendered
smoothly.
This document updates RFC 3550 [1] providing recommendations for
smoothly rendering streamed media referenced to common wall clocks
which do not have smooth or continuous behavior in the presence of
leap seconds.
2. Terminology
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [2] and
indicate requirement levels for compliant implementations.
3. Leap seconds
Gross & van Brandenburg Expires May 19, 2014 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft RTP Leap Seconds November 2013
The world scientific time standard is International Atomic Time (TAI)
which is based on vibrations of cesium atoms in an atomic clock. The
Show full document text