%% You should probably cite rfc6792 instead of this I-D. @techreport{ietf-avtcore-monarch-16, number = {draft-ietf-avtcore-monarch-16}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-avtcore-monarch/16/}, author = {Qin Wu and Geoff Hunt and Philip Arden}, title = {{Guidelines for Use of the RTP Monitoring Framework}}, pagetotal = 28, year = 2012, month = jun, day = 20, abstract = {This memo proposes an extensible RTP monitoring framework for extending RTP Control Protocol (RTCP) with a new RTCP Extended Reports (XR) (RFC3611) block type to report new metrics regarding media transmission or reception quality, following RTCP guidelines established in RFC5968. This memo suggests that a new block should contain a single metric or a small number of metrics relevant to a single parameter of interest or concern, rather than containing a number of metrics which attempt to provide full coverage of all those parameters of concern to a specific application. Applications may then "mix and match" to create a set of blocks which covers their set of concerns. Where possible, a specific block should be designed to be re-usable across more than one application, for example, for all of voice, streaming audio and video.}, }