%% You should probably cite rfc9071 instead of this I-D. @techreport{ietf-avtcore-multi-party-rtt-mix-07, number = {draft-ietf-avtcore-multi-party-rtt-mix-07}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-avtcore-multi-party-rtt-mix/07/}, author = {Gunnar Hellstrom}, title = {{RTP-mixer formatting of multi-party Real-time text}}, pagetotal = 53, year = 2020, month = jul, day = 12, abstract = {Real-time text mixers for multi-party sessions need to identify the source of each transmitted group of text so that the text can be presented by endpoints in suitable grouping with other text from the same source. Regional regulatory requirements specify provision of real-time text in multi-party calls. RFC 4103 mixer implementations can use traditional RTP functions for source identification, but the mixer source switching performance is limited when using the default transmission with redundancy. Enhancements for RFC 4103 real-time text mixing is provided in this document, suitable for a centralized conference model that enables source identification and source switching. The intended use is for real-time text mixers and multi-party-aware participant endpoints. Two mechanisms are provided. The mechanisms builds on use of the CSRC list in the RTP packet for source identification. One method makes use of the same "text/red" format as for two-party sessions, while the other makes use of an extended packet format "text/rex" for more efficient transmission. A capability exchange is specified so that it can be verified that a participant can handle the multi-party coded real-time text stream. The capability for one method is by use of a media attribute a=rtt- mix-rtp-mixer. The other method is indicated by the media subtype "text/rex". The document updates RFC 4102{[}RFC4102{]} and RFC 4103{[}RFC4103{]} A brief description about how a mixer can format text for the case when the endpoint is not multi-party aware is also provided.}, }