%% You should probably cite draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-scip-09 instead of this revision. @techreport{ietf-avtcore-rtp-scip-01, number = {draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-scip-01}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-scip/01/}, author = {Dan Hanson and MikeFaller and Keith Maver}, title = {{RTP Payload Format for the SCIP Codec}}, pagetotal = 12, year = 2022, month = may, day = 25, abstract = {This document describes the RTP payload format of the Secure Communication Interoperability Protocol (SCIP) as audio and video media subtypes. It provides RFC 6838 compliant media subtype definitions. SCIP-214.2 and SCIP-210 describe the protocols that comprise the SCIP RTP packet payload. This document follows the registration for related media types called "audio/scip" and "video/scip" with IANA and formatted according to RFC 4855.}, }