Considerations for Deploying the Rapid Acquisition of Multicast RTP Sessions (RAMS) Method
draft-ietf-avtext-rams-scenarios-05
Yes
(Gonzalo Camarillo)
No Objection
(Adrian Farrel)
(Benoît Claise)
(Brian Haberman)
(Pete Resnick)
(Ralph Droms)
(Robert Sparks)
(Ron Bonica)
(Sean Turner)
(Stewart Bryant)
(Wesley Eddy)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 04 and is now closed.
Gonzalo Camarillo Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -04)
Unknown
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -04)
Unknown
Barry Leiba Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2012-04-29 for -04)
Unknown
Substantive comments; please adopt or respond to these: This seems to be a well written document. Security Considerations: Might it not be better to say something like this?: "Because this document describes deployment scenarios for RAMS, all security considerations are specified in the RAMS specifiction [RFC6285]." ======== Editorial suggestions. No need to respond to these; take them or modify them as you please: IANA Considerations: You might add an RFC Editor note to remove this section prior to publication, which is the normal practice for "empty" IANA Considerations sections.
Benoît Claise Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -04)
Unknown
Brian Haberman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -04)
Unknown
Martin Stiemerling Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2012-05-07 for -04)
Unknown
A good document and I have one substantial comment to be addressed: It is required to add a reference to RFC 6285 about the discussion of RAMS potentially causing congestion. The place to add this would be in the beginning of Section 5. "FEC during RAMS and Bandwidth Issues". Otherwise, Section 5 is sort of incomplete, as it suggests that RTP sender and receiver have alway full knowledge about the state of the network path between both. RFC 6285 is documenting the challenges nicely.
Pete Resnick Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -04)
Unknown
Ralph Droms Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -04)
Unknown
Robert Sparks Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -04)
Unknown
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -04)
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2012-05-06 for -04)
Unknown
Please consider the editorial issues raise in the Gen-ART Review by Vijay Gurbani on 27-Apr-2012. The review can be found here: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/current/msg07402.html
Sean Turner Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -04)
Unknown
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2012-05-09 for -04)
Unknown
I agree with the secdir review and Barry's comment about the security considerations and believe this is being handled already.
Stewart Bryant Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Wesley Eddy Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -04)
Unknown