IPv6 Addressing of IPv4/IPv6 Translators
draft-ietf-behave-address-format-10
Yes
(David Harrington)
(Jari Arkko)
No Objection
(Adrian Farrel)
(Dan Romascanu)
(Gonzalo Camarillo)
(Peter Saint-Andre)
(Ron Bonica)
(Sean Turner)
(Stewart Bryant)
(Tim Polk)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 10 and is now closed.
David Harrington Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Alexey Melnikov Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2010-08-16)
All BEHAVE documents should be updated to use lowercased hex digits (as per Section 4.3 of draft-ietf-6man-text-addr-representation) in example addresses.
Dan Romascanu Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Gonzalo Camarillo Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Peter Saint-Andre Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Ralph Droms Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2010-08-11)
Minor comment ... the name "Well Known Prefix" seems underspecified; however, I can't suggest something terse that seems better. Maybe "Well Known 64xlate Prefix"?
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Sean Turner Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Stewart Bryant Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Tim Polk Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2010-08-11)
The PL row in Figure 1 includes superfluous lengths 112 and 120 bits. I would suggest:
OLD
+--+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
|PL| 0-------------32--40--48--56--64--72--80--88--96--104-112-120-|
+--+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
NEW
+--+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
|PL| 0-------------32--40--48--56--64--72--80--88--96--104----------|
+--+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
(2)
In the paragraph following figure 1:
s/prefic is 96 bits/prefix is 96 bits/