%% You should probably cite rfc6144 instead of this I-D. @techreport{ietf-behave-v6v4-framework-10, number = {draft-ietf-behave-v6v4-framework-10}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-behave-v6v4-framework/10/}, author = {Xing Li and Fred Baker and Kevin Yin and Congxiao Bao}, title = {{Framework for IPv4/IPv6 Translation}}, pagetotal = 31, year = 2010, month = aug, day = 17, abstract = {This note describes a framework for IPv4/IPv6 translation. This is in the context of replacing Network Address Translation - Protocol Translation (NAT-PT), which was deprecated by RFC 4966, and to enable networks to have IPv4 and IPv6 coexist in a somewhat rational manner while transitioning to an IPv6 network. This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is published for informational purposes.}, }