Internet Group Management Protocol (IGMP) and Multicast Listener Discovery (MLD) Proxies for Ethernet VPN (EVPN)
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy-21
The information below is for an old version of the document that is already published as an RFC.
Document | Type |
This is an older version of an Internet-Draft that was ultimately published as RFC 9251.
|
|
---|---|---|---|
Authors | Ali Sajassi , Samir Thoria , Mankamana Prasad Mishra , John Drake , Wen Lin | ||
Last updated | 2023-04-27 (Latest revision 2022-03-22) | ||
Replaces | draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy | ||
RFC stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
Intended RFC status | Proposed Standard | ||
Formats | |||
Reviews |
GENART Last Call review
(of
-12)
by Matt Joras
Ready w/nits
TSVART Last Call review
(of
-12)
by Brian Trammell
Ready w/issues
|
||
Additional resources | Mailing list discussion | ||
Stream | WG state | Submitted to IESG for Publication | |
Document shepherd | Stephane Litkowski | ||
Shepherd write-up | Show Last changed 2021-04-19 | ||
IESG | IESG state | Became RFC 9251 (Proposed Standard) | |
Action Holders |
(None)
|
||
Consensus boilerplate | Yes | ||
Telechat date | (None) | ||
Responsible AD | Martin Vigoureux | ||
Send notices to | (None) | ||
IANA | IANA review state | Version Changed - Review Needed | |
IANA action state | RFC-Ed-Ack |
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy-21
BESS WorkGroup A. Sajassi Internet-Draft S. Thoria Intended status: Standards Track M. Mishra Expires: September 23, 2022 Cisco Systems K. Patel Arrcus J. Drake W. Lin Juniper Networks March 22, 2022 IGMP and MLD Proxy for EVPN draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy-21 Abstract This document describes how to support efficiently endpoints running IGMP(Internet Group Management Protocol) or MLD (Multicast Listener Discovery) for the multicast services over an EVPN network by incorporating IGMP/MLD proxy procedures on EVPN (Ethernet VPN) PEs. Status of This Memo This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." This Internet-Draft will expire on September 23, 2022. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2022 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents Sajassi, et al. Expires September 23, 2022 [Page 1] Internet-Draft IGMP and MLD Proxy for EVPN March 2022 carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License. Table of Contents 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2. Specification of Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 3. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 4. IGMP/MLD Proxy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 4.1. Proxy Reporting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 4.1.1. IGMP/MLD Membership Report Advertisement in BGP . . . 7 4.1.2. IGMP/MLD Leave Group Advertisement in BGP . . . . . . 9 4.2. Proxy Querier . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 5. Operation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 5.1. PE with only attached hosts for a given subnet . . . . . 11 5.2. PE with a mix of attached hosts and multicast source . . 12 5.3. PE with a mix of attached hosts, a multicast source and a router . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 6. All-Active Multi-Homing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 6.1. Local IGMP/MLD Membership Report Synchronization . . . . 12 6.2. Local IGMP/MLD Leave Group Synchronization . . . . . . . 13 6.2.1. Remote Leave Group Synchronization . . . . . . . . . 14 6.2.2. Common Leave Group Synchronization . . . . . . . . . 14 6.3. Mass Withdraw of Multicast Membership Report Sync route in case of failure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 7. Single-Active Multi-Homing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 8. Selective Multicast Procedures for IR tunnels . . . . . . . . 15 9. BGP Encoding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 9.1. Selective Multicast Ethernet Tag Route . . . . . . . . . 16 9.1.1. Constructing the Selective Multicast Ethernet Tag route . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 9.1.2. Reconstructing IGMP / MLD Membership Reports from Selective Multicast Route . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 9.1.3. Default Selective Multicast Route . . . . . . . . . . 20 9.2. Multicast Membership Report Synch Route . . . . . . . . . 21 9.2.1. Constructing the Multicast Membership Report Synch Route . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 9.2.2. Reconstructing IGMP / MLD Membership Reports from Multicast Membership Report Sync Route . . . . . . . 23 9.3. Multicast Leave Synch Route . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 9.3.1. Constructing the Multicast Leave Synch Route . . . . 26 9.3.2. Reconstructing IGMP / MLD Leave from Multicast Leave Sync Route . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 9.4. Multicast Flags Extended Community . . . . . . . . . . . 28 9.5. EVI-RT Extended Community . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 Sajassi, et al. Expires September 23, 2022 [Page 2] Internet-Draft IGMP and MLD Proxy for EVPN March 2022 9.6. Rewriting of RT ECs and EVI-RT ECs by ASBRs . . . . . . . 31 9.7. BGP Error Handling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 10. IGMP Version 1 Membership Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 11. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 12. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 12.1. EVPN Extended Community Sub-Types Registrations . . . . 32 12.2. EVPN Route Type Registration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 12.3. Multicast Flags Extended Community Registry . . . . . . 33 13. Acknowledgement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 14. Contributors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 15. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 15.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 15.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 1. Introduction In DC applications, a point of delivery (POD) can consist of a collection of servers supported by several top of rack (ToR) and spine switches. This collection of servers and switches are self contained and may have their own control protocol for intra-POD communication and orchestration. However, EVPN is used as standard way of inter-POD communication for both intra-DC and inter-DC. A subnet can span across multiple PODs and DCs. EVPN provides a robust multi-tenant solution with extensive multi-homing capabilities to stretch a subnet (VLAN) across multiple PODs and DCs. There can be many hosts (several hundreds) attached to a subnet that is stretched across several PODs and DCs. These hosts express their interests in multicast groups on a given subnet/VLAN by sending IGMP/MLD Membership Reports for their interested multicast group(s). Furthermore, an IGMP/MLD router periodically sends membership queries to find out if there are hosts on that subnet that are still interested in receiving multicast traffic for that group. The IGMP/MLD Proxy solution described in this document accomplishes three objectives: 1. Reduce flooding of IGMP/MLD messages: just like the ARP/ND suppression mechanism in EVPN to reduce the flooding of ARP messages over EVPN, it is also desired to have a mechanism to reduce the flooding of IGMP/MLD messages (both Queries and Membership Reports) in EVPN. 2. Distributed anycast multicast proxy: it is desirable for the EVPN network to act as a distributed anycast multicast router with respect to IGMP/MLD proxy function for all the hosts attached to that subnet. Sajassi, et al. Expires September 23, 2022 [Page 3] Internet-Draft IGMP and MLD Proxy for EVPN March 2022 3. Selective Multicast: to forward multicast traffic over EVPN network such that it only gets forwarded to the PEs that have interest in the multicast group(s). This document shows how this objective may be achieved when Ingress Replication is used to distribute the multicast traffic among the PEs. Procedures for supporting selective multicast using P2MP tunnels can be found in [I-D.ietf-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates] The first two objectives are achieved by using IGMP/MLD proxy on the PE. The third objective is achieved by setting up a multicast tunnel only among the PEs that have interest in that multicast group(s) based on the trigger from IGMP/MLD proxy processes. The proposed solutions for each of these objectives are discussed in the following sections. 2. Specification of Requirements The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here. 3. Terminology o AC: Attachment Circuit. o All-Active Redundancy Mode: When all PEs attached to an Ethernet segment are allowed to forward known unicast traffic to/from that Ethernet segment for a given VLAN, then the Ethernet segment is defined to be operating in All-Active redundancy mode. o BD: Broadcast Domain. As per [RFC7432], an EVI consists of a single or multiple BDs. In case of VLAN-bundle and VLAN-aware bundle service model, an EVI contains multiple BDs. Also, in this document, BD and subnet are equivalent terms. o DC: Data Center o Ethernet Segment (ES): When a customer site (device or network) is connected to one or more PEs via a set of Ethernet links. o Ethernet Segment Identifier (ESI): A unique non-zero identifier that identifies an Ethernet Segment. o Ethernet Tag: It identifies a particular broadcast domain, e.g., a VLAN. An EVPN instance consists of one or more broadcast domains. Sajassi, et al. Expires September 23, 2022 [Page 4] Internet-Draft IGMP and MLD Proxy for EVPN March 2022 o EVI: An EVPN instance spanning the Provider Edge (PE) devices participating in that EVPN o EVPN: Ethernet Virtual Private Network o IGMP: Internet Group Management Protocol o IR: Ingress Replication o MLD: Multicast Listener Discovery o OIF: Outgoing Interface for multicast. It can be physical interface, virtual interface or tunnel. o PE: Provider Edge. o POD: Point of Delivery o S-PMSI: Selective P-Multicast Service Interface - a conceptual interface for a PE to send customer multicast traffic to some of the PEs in the same VPN. o Single-Active Redundancy Mode: When only a single PE, among all the PEs attached to an Ethernet segment, is allowed to forward traffic to/from that Ethernet segment for a given VLAN, then the Ethernet segment is defined to be operating in Single-Active redundancy mode. o SMET: Selective Multicast Ethernet Tag o ToR: Top of Rack This document also assumes familiarity with the terminology of [RFC7432], [RFC3376], [RFC2236] . Though most of the place this document uses term IGMP Membership Report, the text applies equally for MLD Membership Report too. Similarly, text for IGMPv2 applies to MLDv1 and text for IGMPv3 applies to MLDv2. IGMP / MLD version encoding in BGP update is stated in Section 9 It is important to note when there is text considering whether a PE indicates support for IGMP proxying, the corresponding behavior has a natural analogue for indication of support for MLD proxying, and the analogous requirements apply as well. Sajassi, et al. Expires September 23, 2022 [Page 5] Internet-Draft IGMP and MLD Proxy for EVPN March 2022 4. IGMP/MLD Proxy The IGMP Proxy mechanism is used to reduce the flooding of IGMP messages over an EVPN network similar to ARP proxy used in reducing the flooding of ARP messages over EVPN. It also provides a triggering mechanism for the PEs to setup their underlay multicast tunnels. The IGMP Proxy mechanism consists of two components: 1. Proxy for IGMP Membership Reports. 2. Proxy for IGMP Membership Queries. The goal of IGMP and MLD proxying is to make the EVPN behave seamlessly for the tenant systems with respect to multicast operations, while using a more efficient delivery system for signaling and delivery across the VPN. Accordingly, group state must be tracked synchronously among the PEs serving the VPN, with join and leave events propagated to the peer PEs, and each PE tracking the state of each of its peer PEs with respect whether there are locally attached group members (and in some cases, senders), what version(s) of IGMP/MLD are in use for those locally attached group members, etc. In order to perform this translation, each PE acts as an IGMP router for the locally attached domain, and maintains the requisite state on locally attached nodes, sends periodic membership queries, etc. The role of EVPN SMET route propagation is to ensure that each PE's local state is propagated to the other PEs so that they share a consistent view of the overall IGMP Membership Request and Leave Group state. It is important to note that the need to keep such local state can be triggered by either local IGMP traffic or BGP EVPN signaling. In most cases a local IGMP event will need to be signaled over EVPN, though state initiated by received EVPN traffic will not always need to be relayed to the locally attached domain. 4.1. Proxy Reporting When IGMP protocol is used between hosts and their first hop EVPN router (EVPN PE), Proxy-reporting is used by the EVPN PE to summarize (when possible) reports received from downstream hosts and propagate them in BGP to other PEs that are interested in the information. This is done by terminating the IGMP Reports in the first hop PE, and translating and exchanging the relevant information among EVPN BGP speakers. The information is again translated back to IGMP message at the recipient EVPN speaker. Thus it helps create an IGMP overlay subnet using BGP. In order to facilitate such an overlay, this document also defines a new EVPN route type NLRI, the EVPN Selective Multicast Ethernet Tag route, along with its procedures to help exchange and register IGMP multicast groups Section 9. Sajassi, et al. Expires September 23, 2022 [Page 6] Internet-Draft IGMP and MLD Proxy for EVPN March 2022 4.1.1. IGMP/MLD Membership Report Advertisement in BGP When a PE wants to advertise an IGMP Membership Report using the BGP EVPN route, it follows the following rules (BGP encoding stated in Section 9). Where first four rules are applicable to originator PE and last three rules are applicable to remote PE processing SMET routes: Processing at BGP route originator: 1. When the first hop PE receives IGMP Membership Reports , belonging to the same IGMP version, from different attached hosts for the same (*,G) or (S,G), it SHOULD send a single BGP message corresponding to the very first IGMP Membership Request (BGP update as soon as possible) for that (*,G) or (S,G). This is because BGP is a stateful protocol and no further transmission of the same report is needed. If the IGMP Membership Request is for (*,G), then multicast group address MUST be sent along with the corresponding version flag (v2 or v3) set. In case of IGMPv3, the exclude flag MUST also be set to indicate that no source IP address must be excluded (include all sources "*"). If the IGMP Membership Report is for (S,G), then besides setting multicast group address along with the version flag v3, the source IP address and the IE flag MUST be set. It should be noted that when advertising the EVPN route for (S,G), the only valid version flag is v3 (v2 flags MUST be set to zero). 2. When the first hop PE receives an IGMPv3 Membership Report for (S,G) on a given BD, it MUST advertise the corresponding EVPN Selective Multicast Ethernet Tag (SMET) route regardless of whether the source (S) is attached to itself or not in order to facilitate the source move in the future. 3. When the first hop PE receives an IGMP version-X Membership Report first for (*,G) and then later it receives an IGMP version-Y Membership Report for the same (*,G), then it MUST re- advertise the same EVPN SMET route with flag for version-Y set in addition to any previously-set version flag(s). In other words, the first hop PE MUST NOT withdraw the EVPN route before sending the new route because the flag field is not part of BGP route key processing. 4. When the first hop PE receives an IGMP version-X Membership Report first for (*,G) and then later it receives an IGMPv3 Membership Report for the same multicast group address but for a specific source address S, then the PE MUST advertise a new EVPN SMET route with v3 flag set (and v2 reset). The IE flag also need to be set accordingly. Since source IP address is used as Sajassi, et al. Expires September 23, 2022 [Page 7] Internet-Draft IGMP and MLD Proxy for EVPN March 2022 part of BGP route key processing it is considered as a new BGP route advertisement. When different version of IGMP Membership Report are received, final state MUST be as per section 5.1 of [RFC3376]. At the end of route processing local and remote group record state MUST be as per section 5.1 of [RFC3376]. Processing at BGP route receiver: 1. When a PE receives an EVPN SMET route with more than one version flag set, it will generate the corresponding IGMP report for (*,G) for each version specified in the flags field. With multiple version flags set, there must not be source IP address in the received EVPN route. If there is, then an error SHOULD be logged. If the v3 flag is set (in addition to v2), then the IE flag MUST indicate "exclude". If not, then an error SHOULD be logged. The PE MUST generate an IGMP Membership Report for that (*,G) and each IGMP version in the version flag. 2. When a PE receives a list of EVPN SMET NLRIs in its BGP update message, each with a different source IP address and the same multicast group address, and the version flag is set to v3, then the PE generates an IGMPv3 Membership Report with a record corresponding to the list of source IP addresses and the group address along with the proper indication of inclusion/exclusion. 3. Upon receiving EVPN SMET route(s) and before generating the corresponding IGMP Membership Request(s), the PE checks to see whether it has any CE multicast router for that BD on any of its ES's . The PE provides such a check by listening for PIM Hello messages on that AC (i.e, ES,BD). If the PE does have the router's ACs, then the generated IGMP Membership Request(s) are sent to those ACs. If it doesn't have any of the router's AC, then no IGMP Membership Request(s) needs to be generated. This is because sending IGMP Membership Requests to other hosts can result in unintentionally preventing a host from joining a specific multicast group using IGMPv2 - i.e., if the PE does not receive a Membership Report from the host it will not forward multicast data to it. Per [RFC4541] , when an IGMPv2 host receives a Membership Report for a group address that it intends to join, the host will suppress its own membership report for the same group, and if the PE does not receive an IGMP Membership Report from the host it will not forward multicast data to it. In other words, an IGMPv2 Membership Report MUST NOT be sent on an AC that does not lead to a CE multicast router. This message suppression is a requirement for IGMPv2 hosts. This is not a problem for hosts running IGMPv3 because there is no suppression of IGMP Membership Reports. Sajassi, et al. Expires September 23, 2022 [Page 8] Internet-Draft IGMP and MLD Proxy for EVPN March 2022 4.1.2. IGMP/MLD Leave Group Advertisement in BGP When a PE wants to withdraw an EVPN SMET route corresponding to an IGMPv2 Leave Group or IGMPv3 "Leave" equivalent message, it follows the following rules, where first rule defines the procedure at originator PE and last two rules talk about procedures at remote PE: Processing at BGP route originator: 1. When a PE receives an IGMPv2 Leave Group or its "Leave" equivalent message for IGMPv3 from its attached host, it checks to see if this host is the last host that is interested in this multicast group by sending a query for the multicast group. If the host was indeed the last one (i.e. no responses are received for the query), then the PE MUST re-advertises EVPN SMET Multicast route with the corresponding version flag reset. If this is the last version flag to be reset, then instead of re- advertising the EVPN route with all version flags reset, the PE MUST withdraw the EVPN route for that (*,G). Processing at BGP route receiver: 1. When a PE receives an EVPN SMET route for a given (*,G), it compares the received version flags from the route with its per- PE stored version flags. If the PE finds that a version flag associated with the (*,G) for the remote PE is reset, then the PE MUST generate IGMP Leave for that (*,G) toward its local interface (if any) attached to the multicast router for that multicast group. It should be noted that the received EVPN route MUST at least have one version flag set. If all version flags are reset, it is an error because the PE should have received an EVPN route withdraw for the last version flag. Error MUST be considered as a BGP error and the PE MUST apply the "treat-as- withdraw" procedure of [RFC7606]. 2. When a PE receives an EVPN SMET route withdraw, it removes the remote PE from its OIF list for that multicast group and if there are no more OIF entries for that multicast group (either locally or remotely), then the PE MUST stop responding to Membership Queries from the locally attached router (if any). If there is a source for that multicast group, the PE stops sending multicast traffic for that source. 4.2. Proxy Querier As mentioned in the previous sections, each PE MUST have proxy querier functionality for the following reasons: Sajassi, et al. Expires September 23, 2022 [Page 9] Internet-Draft IGMP and MLD Proxy for EVPN March 2022 1. To enable the collection of EVPN PEs providing L2VPN service to act as distributed multicast router with Anycast IP address for all attached hosts in that subnet. 2. To enable suppression of IGMP Membership Reports and Membership Queries over MPLS/IP core. 5. Operation Consider the EVPN network of Figure-1, where there is an EVPN instance configured across the PEs shown in this figure (namely PE1, PE2, and PE3). Let's consider that this EVPN instance consists of a single bridge domain (single subnet) with all the hosts, sources, and the multicast router connected to this subnet. PE1 only has hosts(host denoted by Hx) connected to it. PE2 has a mix of hosts and a multicast source. PE3 has a mix of hosts, a multicast source (source denoted by Sx), and a multicast router (router denoted by Rx). Furthermore, let's consider that for (S1,G1), R1 is used as the multicast router. The following subsections describe the IGMP proxy operation in different PEs with regard to whether the locally attached devices for that subnet are: o only hosts o mix of hosts and multicast source o mix of hosts, multicast source, and multicast router Sajassi, et al. Expires September 23, 2022 [Page 10] Internet-Draft IGMP and MLD Proxy for EVPN March 2022 +--------------+ | | | | +----+ | | +----+ H1:(*,G1)v2 ---| | | | | |---- H6(*,G1)v2 H2:(*,G1)v2 ---| PE1| | IP/MPLS | | PE2|---- H7(S2,G2)v3 H3:(*,G1)v3 ---| | | Network | | |---- S2 H4:(S2,G2)v3 --| | | | | | +----+ | | +----+ | | +----+ | | H5:(S1,G1)v3 --| | | | S1 ---| PE3| | | R1 ---| | | | +----+ | | | | +--------------+ Figure 1: EVPN network 5.1. PE with only attached hosts for a given subnet When PE1 receives an IGMPv2 Membership Report from H1, it does not forward this Membership Report to any of its other ports (for this subnet) because all these local ports are associated with the hosts. PE1 sends an EVPN Multicast Group route corresponding to this Membership Report for (*,G1) and setting v2 flag. This EVPN route is received by PE2 and PE3 that are the members of the same BD (i.e., same EVI in case of VLAN-based service or EVI,VLAN in case of VLAN- aware bundle service). PE3 reconstructs the IGMPv2 Membership Report from this EVPN BGP route and only sends it to the port(s) with multicast routers attached to it (for that subnet). In this example, PE3 sends the reconstructed IGMPv2 Membership Report for (*,G1) only to R1. Furthermore, even though PE2 receives the EVPN BGP route, it does not send it to any of its ports for that subnet; viz, ports associated with H6 and H7. When PE1 receives the second IGMPv2 Membership Report from H2 for the same multicast group (*,G1), it only adds that port to its OIF list but it doesn't send any EVPN BGP route because there is no change in information. However, when it receives the IGMPv3 Membership Report from H3 for the same (*,G1). Besides adding the corresponding port to its OIF list, it re-advertises the previously sent EVPN SMET route with the v3 and exclude flag set. Sajassi, et al. Expires September 23, 2022 [Page 11] Internet-Draft IGMP and MLD Proxy for EVPN March 2022 Finally when PE1 receives the IGMPv3 Membership Report from H4 for (S2,G2), it advertises a new EVPN SMET route corresponding to it. 5.2. PE with a mix of attached hosts and multicast source The main difference in this case is that when PE2 receives the IGMPv3 Membership Report from H7 for (S2,G2), it does advertise it in BGP to support source move even though PE2 knows that S2 is attached to its local AC. PE2 adds the port associated with H7 to its OIF list for (S2,G2). The processing for IGMPv2 received from H6 is the same as the IGMPv2 Membership Report described in previous section. 5.3. PE with a mix of attached hosts, a multicast source and a router The main difference in this case relative to the previous two sections is that IGMP v2/v3 Membership Report messages received locally need to be sent to the port associated with router R1. Furthermore, the Membership Reports received via BGP (SMET) need to be passed to the R1 port but filtered for all other ports. 6. All-Active Multi-Homing Because the LAG flow hashing algorithm used by the CE is unknown at the PE, in an All-Active redundancy mode it must be assumed that the CE can send a given IGMP message to any one of the multi-homed PEs, either DF or non-DF; i.e., different IGMP Membership Request messages can arrive at different PEs in the redundancy group and furthermore their corresponding Leave messages can arrive at PEs that are different from the ones that received the Membership Report. Therefore, all PEs attached to a given ES must coordinate IGMP Membership Request and Leave Group (x,G) state, where x may be either '*' or a particular source S, for each BD on that ES. Each PE has a local copy of that state and the EVPN signaling serves to synchronize state across PEs. This allows the DF for that (ES,BD) to correctly advertise or withdraw a Selective Multicast Ethernet Tag (SMET) route for that (x,G) group in that BD when needed. All-Active multihoming PEs for a given ES MUST support IGMP synchronization procedures described in this section if they need to perform IGMP proxy for hosts connected to that ES. 6.1. Local IGMP/MLD Membership Report Synchronization When a PE, either DF or non-DF, receives on a given multihomed ES operating in All-Active redundancy mode, an IGMP Membership Report for (x,G), it determines the BD to which the IGMP Membership Report belongs. If the PE doesn't already have local IGMP Membership Request (x,G) state for that BD on that ES, it MUST instantiate local IGMP Membership Request (x,G) state and MUST advertise a BGP IGMP Sajassi, et al. Expires September 23, 2022 [Page 12] Internet-Draft IGMP and MLD Proxy for EVPN March 2022 Membership Report Synch route for that (ES,BD). Local IGMP Membership Request (x,G) state refers to IGMP Membership Request (x,G) state that is created as a result of processing an IGMP Membership Report for (x,G). The IGMP Membership Report Synch route MUST carry the ES-Import RT for the ES on which the IGMP Membership Report was received. Thus it MUST only be imported by the PEs attached to that ES and not any other PEs. When a PE, either DF or non-DF, receives an IGMP Membership Report Synch route it installs that route and if it doesn't already have IGMP Membership Request (x,G) state for that (ES,BD), it MUST instantiate that IGMP Membership Request (x,G) state - i.e., IGMP Membership Request (x,G) state is the union of the local IGMP Membership Report (x,G) state and the installed IGMP Membership Report Synch route. If the DF did not already advertise (originate) a SMET route for that (x,G) group in that BD, it MUST do so now. When a PE, either DF or non-DF, deletes its local IGMP Membership Request (x,G) state for that (ES,BD), it MUST withdraw its BGP IGMP Membership Report Synch route for that (ES,BD). When a PE, either DF or non-DF, receives the withdrawal of an IGMP Membership Report Synch route from another PE it MUST remove that route. When a PE has no local IGMP Membership Request (x,G) state and it has no installed IGMP Membership Report Synch routes, it MUST remove IGMP Membership Request (x,G) state for that (ES,BD). If the DF no longer has IGMP Membership Request (x,G) state for that BD on any ES for which it is DF, it MUST withdraw its SMET route for that (x,G) group in that BD. In other words, a PE advertises an SMET route for that (x,G) group in that BD when it has IGMP Membership Request (x,G) state in that BD on at least one ES for which it is DF and it withdraws that SMET route when it does not have IGMP Membership Request (x,G) state in that BD on any ES for which it is DF. 6.2. Local IGMP/MLD Leave Group Synchronization When a PE, either DF or non-DF, receives, on a given multihomed ES operating in All-Active redundancy mode, an IGMP Leave Group message for (x,G) from the attached CE, it determines the BD to which the IGMPv2 Leave Group belongs. Regardless of whether it has IGMP Membership Request (x,G) state for that (ES,BD), it initiates the (x,G) leave group synchronization procedure, which consists of the following steps: Sajassi, et al. Expires September 23, 2022 [Page 13] Internet-Draft IGMP and MLD Proxy for EVPN March 2022 1. It computes the Maximum Response Time, which is the duration of (x,G) leave group synchronization procedure. This is the product of two locally configured values, Last Member Query Count and Last Member Query Interval (described in Section 3 of [RFC2236]), plus a delta corresponding to the time it takes for a BGP advertisement to propagate between the PEs attached to the multihomed ES (delta is a consistently configured value on all PEs attached to the multihomed ES). 2. It starts the Maximum Response Time timer. Note that the receipt of subsequent IGMP Leave Group messages or BGP Leave Synch routes for (x,G) do not change the value of a currently running Maximum Response Time timer and are ignored by the PE. 3. It initiates the Last Member Query procedure described in Section 3 of [RFC2236]; viz, it sends a number of Group-Specific Query (x,G) messages (Last Member Query Count) at a fixed interval (Last Member Query Interval) to the attached CE. 4. It advertises an IGMP Leave Synch route for that that (ES,BD). This route notifies the other multihomed PEs attached to the given multihomed ES that it has initiated an (x,G) leave group synchronization procedure; i.e., it carries the ES-Import RT for the ES on which the IGMP Leave Group was received. It also contains the Maximum Response Time. 5. When the Maximum Response Timer expires, the PE that has advertised the IGMP Leave Synch route withdraws it. 6.2.1. Remote Leave Group Synchronization When a PE, either DF or non-DF, receives an IGMP Leave Synch route it installs that route and it starts a timer for (x,G) on the specified (ES,BD) whose value is set to the Maximum Response Time in the received IGMP Leave Synch route. Note that the receipt of subsequent IGMPv2 Leave Group messages or BGP Leave Synch routes for (x,G) do not change the value of a currently running Maximum Response Time timer and are ignored by the PE. 6.2.2. Common Leave Group Synchronization If a PE attached to the multihomed ES receives an IGMP Membership Report for (x,G) before the Maximum Response Time timer expires, it advertises a BGP IGMP Membership Report Synch route for that (ES,BD). If it doesn't already have local IGMP Membership Request (x,G) state for that (ES,BD), it instantiates local IGMP Membership Request (x,G) state. If the DF is not currently advertising (originating) a SMET route for that (x,G) group in that BD, it does so now. Sajassi, et al. Expires September 23, 2022 [Page 14] Internet-Draft IGMP and MLD Proxy for EVPN March 2022 If a PE attached to the multihomed ES receives an IGMP Membership Report Synch route for (x,G) before the Maximum Response Time timer expires, it installs that route and if it doesn't already have IGMP Membership Request (x,G) state for that BD on that ES, it instantiates that IGMP Membership Request (x,G) state. If the DF has not already advertised (originated) a SMET route for that (x,G) group in that BD, it does so now. When the Maximum Response Timer expires a PE that has advertised an IGMP Leave Synch route, withdraws it. Any PE attached to the multihomed ES, that started the Maximum Response Time and has no local IGMP Membership Request (x,G) state and no installed IGMP Membership Report Synch routes, it removes IGMP Membership Request (x,G) state for that (ES,BD). If the DF no longer has IGMP Membership Request (x,G) state for that BD on any ES for which it is DF, it withdraws its SMET route for that (x,G) group in that BD. 6.3. Mass Withdraw of Multicast Membership Report Sync route in case of failure A PE which has received an IGMP Membership Request would have synced the IGMP Membership Report by the procedure defined in section 6.1. If a PE with local Membership Report state goes down or the PE to CE link goes down, it would lead to a mass withdraw of multicast routes. Remote PEs (PEs where these routes were remote IGMP Membership Reports) SHOULD NOT remove the state immediately; instead General Query SHOULD be generated to refresh the states. There are several ways to detect failure at a peer, e.g. using IGP next hop tracking or ES route withdraw. 7. Single-Active Multi-Homing Note that to facilitate state synchronization after failover, the PEs attached to a multihomed ES operating in Single-Active redundancy mode SHOULD also coordinate IGMP Membership Report (x,G) state. In this case all IGMP Membership Report messages are received by the DF and distributed to the non-DF PEs using the procedures described above. 8. Selective Multicast Procedures for IR tunnels If an ingress PE uses ingress replication, then for a given (x,G) group in a given BD: 1. It sends (x,G) traffic to the set of PEs not supporting IGMP or MLD Proxy. This set consists of any PE that has advertised an IMET route for the BD without a Multicast Flags extended community or with a Multicast Flags extended community in which Sajassi, et al. Expires September 23, 2022 [Page 15] Internet-Draft IGMP and MLD Proxy for EVPN March 2022 neither the IGMP Proxy support nor the MLD Proxy support flags are set. 2. It sends (x,G) traffic to the set of PEs supporting IGMP or MLD Proxy and having listeners for that (x,G) group in that BD. This set consists of any PE that has advertised an IMET route for the BD with a Multicast Flags extended community in which the IGMP Proxy support and/or the MLD Proxy support flags are set and that has advertised a SMET route for that (x,G) group in that BD. 9. BGP Encoding This document defines three new BGP EVPN routes to carry IGMP Membership Reports. The route types are known as: + 6 - Selective Multicast Ethernet Tag Route + 7 - Multicast Membership Report Synch Route + 8 - Multicast Leave Synch Route The detailed encoding and procedures for these route types are described in subsequent sections. 9.1. Selective Multicast Ethernet Tag Route A Selective Multicast Ethernet Tag route type specific EVPN NLRI consists of the following: Sajassi, et al. Expires September 23, 2022 [Page 16] Internet-Draft IGMP and MLD Proxy for EVPN March 2022 +---------------------------------------+ | RD (8 octets) | +---------------------------------------+ | Ethernet Tag ID (4 octets) | +---------------------------------------+ | Multicast Source Length (1 octet) | +---------------------------------------+ | Multicast Source Address (variable) | +---------------------------------------+ | Multicast Group Length (1 octet) | +---------------------------------------+ | Multicast Group Address (Variable) | +---------------------------------------+ | Originator Router Length (1 octet) | +---------------------------------------+ | Originator Router Address (variable) | +---------------------------------------+ | Flags (1 octet) | +---------------------------------------+ For the purpose of BGP route key processing, all the fields are considered to be part of the prefix in the NLRI except for the one- octet flag field. The Flags fields are defined as follows: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+ | reserved |IE|v3|v2|v1| +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+ o The least significant bit, bit 7 indicates support for IGMP version 1. Since IGMP V1 is being deprecated sender MUST set it as 0 for IGMP and receiver MUST ignore it. o The second least significant bit, bit 6 indicates support for IGMP version 2. o The third least significant bit, bit 5 indicates support for IGMP version 3. o The fourth least significant bit, bit 4 indicates whether the (S,G) information carried within the route-type is of an Include Group type (bit value 0) or an Exclude Group type (bit value 1). The Exclude Group type bit MUST be ignored if bit 5 is not set. Sajassi, et al. Expires September 23, 2022 [Page 17] Internet-Draft IGMP and MLD Proxy for EVPN March 2022 o This EVPN route type is used to carry tenant IGMP multicast group information. The flag field assists in distributing IGMP Membership Report of a given host for a given multicast route. The version bits help associate IGMP version of receivers participating within the EVPN domain. o The include/exclude (IE) bit helps in creating filters for a given multicast route. o If route is used for IPv6 (MLD) then bit 7 indicates support for MLD version 1. The second least significant bit, bit 6 indicates support for MLD version 2. Since there is no MLD version 3, in case of IPv6 route third least significant bit MUST be 0. In case of IPv6 routes, the fourth least significant bit MUST be ignored if bit 6 is not set. o Reserved bits MUST be set to 0 by sender. And receiver MUST ignore the Reserved bits. 9.1.1. Constructing the Selective Multicast Ethernet Tag route This section describes the procedures used to construct the Selective Multicast Ethernet Tag (SMET) route. The Route Distinguisher (RD) SHOULD be a Type 1 RD [RFC4364]. The value field comprises an IP address of the PE (typically, the loopback address) followed by a number unique to the PE. The Ethernet Tag ID MUST be set as procedure defined in [RFC7432]. The Multicast Source Length MUST be set to length of the multicast Source address in bits. If the Multicast Source Address field contains an IPv4 address, then the value of the Multicast Source Length field is 32. If the Multicast Source Address field contains an IPv6 address, then the value of the Multicast Source Length field is 128. In case of a (*,G) Membership Report, the Multicast Source Length is set to 0. The Multicast Source Address is the source IP address from the IGMP Membership Report. In case of a (*,G), this field is not used. The Multicast Group Length MUST be set to length of multicast group address in bits. If the Multicast Group Address field contains an IPv4 address, then the value of the Multicast Group Length field is 32. If the Multicast Group Address field contains an IPv6 address, then the value of the Multicast Group Length field is 128. Sajassi, et al. Expires September 23, 2022 [Page 18] Internet-Draft IGMP and MLD Proxy for EVPN March 2022 The Multicast Group Address is the Group address from the IGMP or MLD Membership Report. The Originator Router Length is the length of the Originator Router Address in bits. The Originator Router Address is the IP address of router originating this route. The SMET Originator Router IP address MUST match that of the IMET (or S-PMSI AD) route originated for the same EVI by the same downstream PE. The Flags field indicates the version of IGMP protocol from which the Membership Report was received. It also indicates whether the multicast group had the INCLUDE or EXCLUDE bit set. Reserved bits MUST be set to 0. They can be defined in future by other document. IGMP is used to receive group membership information from hosts by TORs. Upon receiving the hosts expression of interest of a particular group membership, this information is then forwarded using SMET route. The NLRI also keeps track of receiver's IGMP protocol version and any source filtering for a given group membership. All EVPN SMET routes are announced with per- EVI Route Target extended communities. 9.1.2. Reconstructing IGMP / MLD Membership Reports from Selective Multicast Route This section describes the procedures used to reconstruct IGMP / MLD Membership Reports from SMET route. o If multicast group length is 32, route would be translated to IGMP membership request. If multicast group length is 128, route would be translated to MLD membership request. o Multicast group address field would be translated to IGMP / MLD group address. o If Multicast source length is set to zero it would be translated to any source (*). If multicast source length is non zero, Multicast source address field would be translated to IGMP / MLD source address. o If flag bit 7 is set, it translates Membership report to be IGMP V1 or MLD V1. Sajassi, et al. Expires September 23, 2022 [Page 19] Internet-Draft IGMP and MLD Proxy for EVPN March 2022 o If flag bit 6 is set, it translates Membership report to be IGMP V2 or MLD V2. o Flag bit 5 is only valid for IGMP Membership report and if it is set, it translates to IGMP V3 report. o If IE flag is set, it translate to IGMP / MLD Exclude mode membership report. If IE flag is not set (zero), it translates to Include mode membership report. 9.1.3. Default Selective Multicast Route If there is multicast router connected behind the EVPN domain, the PE MAY originate a default SMET (*,*) to get all multicast traffic in domain. +--------------+ | | | | | | +----+ | | | |---- H1(*,G1)v2 | IP/MPLS | | PE1|---- H2(S2,G2)v3 | Network | | |---- S2 | | | | | | +----+ | | +----+ | | +----+ | | | | | | S1 ---| PE2| | | |PIM |----R1 ---| | | | |ASM | +----+ | | | | | | +----+ +--------------+ Figure 2: Multicast Router behind EVPN domain Consider the EVPN network of Figure-2, where there is an EVPN instance configured across the PEs. Let's consider that PE2 is connected to multicast router R1 and there is a network running PIM ASM behind R1. If there are receivers behind the PIM ASM network the PIM Join would be forwarded to the PIM RP (Rendezvous Point). If receivers behind PIM ASM network are interested in a multicast flow originated by multicast source S2 (behind PE1), it is necessary for PE2 to receive multicast traffic. In this case PE2 MUST originate a (*,*) SMET route to receive all of the multicast traffic in the EVPN Sajassi, et al. Expires September 23, 2022 [Page 20] Internet-Draft IGMP and MLD Proxy for EVPN March 2022 domain. To generate Wildcards (*,*) routes, the procedure from [RFC6625] MUST be used. 9.2. Multicast Membership Report Synch Route This EVPN route type is used to coordinate IGMP Membership Report (x,G) state for a given BD between the PEs attached to a given ES operating in All- Active (or Single-Active) redundancy mode and it consists of following: +--------------------------------------------------+ | RD (8 octets) | +--------------------------------------------------+ | Ethernet Segment Identifier (10 octets) | +--------------------------------------------------+ | Ethernet Tag ID (4 octets) | +--------------------------------------------------+ | Multicast Source Length (1 octet) | +--------------------------------------------------+ | Multicast Source Address (variable) | +--------------------------------------------------+ | Multicast Group Length (1 octet) | +--------------------------------------------------+ | Multicast Group Address (Variable) | +--------------------------------------------------+ | Originator Router Length (1 octet) | +--------------------------------------------------+ | Originator Router Address (variable) | +--------------------------------------------------+ | Flags (1 octet) | +--------------------------------------------------+ For the purpose of BGP route key processing, all the fields are considered to be part of the prefix in the NLRI except for the one- octet Flags field, whose fields are defined as follows: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+ | reserved |IE|v3|v2|v1| +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+ o The least significant bit, bit 7 indicates support for IGMP version 1. Sajassi, et al. Expires September 23, 2022 [Page 21] Internet-Draft IGMP and MLD Proxy for EVPN March 2022 o The second least significant bit, bit 6 indicates support for IGMP version 2. o The third least significant bit, bit 5 indicates support for IGMP version 3. o The fourth least significant bit, bit 4 indicates whether the (S, G) information carried within the route-type is of Include Group type (bit value 0) or an Exclude Group type (bit value 1). The Exclude Group type bit MUST be ignored if bit 5 is not set. o Reserved bits MUST be set to 0. The Flags field assists in distributing IGMP Membership Report of a given host for a given multicast route. The version bits help associate IGMP version of receivers participating within the EVPN domain. The include/exclude bit helps in creating filters for a given multicast route. If route is being prepared for IPv6 (MLD) then bit 7 indicates support for MLD version 1. The second least significant bit, bit 6 indicates support for MLD version 2. Since there is no MLD version 3, in case of IPv6 route third least significant bit MUST be 0. In case of IPv6 route, the fourth least significant bit MUST be ignored if bit 6 is not set. 9.2.1. Constructing the Multicast Membership Report Synch Route This section describes the procedures used to construct the IGMP Membership Report Synch route. Support for these route types is optional. If a PE does not support this route, then it MUST NOT indicate that it supports 'IGMP proxy' in the Multicast Flag extended community for the EVIs corresponding to its multi-homed Ethernet Segments (ESs). An IGMP Membership Report Synch route MUST carry exactly one ES- Import Route Target extended community, the one that corresponds to the ES on which the IGMP Membership Report was received. It MUST also carry exactly one EVI-RT EC, the one that corresponds to the EVI on which the IGMP Membership Report was received. See Section 9.5 for details on how to encode and construct the EVI-RT EC. The Route Distinguisher (RD) SHOULD be a Type 1 RD [RFC4364]. The value field comprises an IP address of the PE (typically, the loopback address) followed by a number unique to the PE. The Ethernet Segment Identifier (ESI) MUST be set to the 10-octet value defined for the ES. Sajassi, et al. Expires September 23, 2022 [Page 22] Internet-Draft IGMP and MLD Proxy for EVPN March 2022 The Ethernet Tag ID MUST be set as per procedure defined in [RFC7432]. The Multicast Source length MUST be set to length of Multicast Source address in bits. If the Multicast Source field contains an IPv4 address, then the value of the Multicast Source Length field is 32. If the Multicast Source field contains an IPv6 address, then the value of the Multicast Source Length field is 128. In case of a (*,G) Membership Report, the Multicast Source Length is set to 0. The Multicast Source is the Source IP address of the IGMP Membership Report. In case of a (*,G) Membership Report, this field does not exist. The Multicast Group length MUST be set to length of multicast group address in bits. If the Multicast Group field contains an IPv4 address, then the value of the Multicast Group Length field is 32. If the Multicast Group field contains an IPv6 address, then the value of the Multicast Group Length field is 128. The Multicast Group is the Group address of the IGMP Membership Report. The Originator Router Length is the length of the Originator Router address in bits. The Originator Router Address is the IP address of Router Originating the prefix. The Flags field indicates the version of IGMP protocol from which the Membership Report was received. It also indicates whether the multicast group had INCLUDE or EXCLUDE bit set. Reserved bits MUST be set to 0. 9.2.2. Reconstructing IGMP / MLD Membership Reports from Multicast Membership Report Sync Route This section describes the procedures used to reconstruct IGMP / MLD Membership Reports from Multicast Membership Report Sync route. o If multicast group length is 32, route would be translated to IGMP membership request. If multicast group length is 128, route would be translated to MLD membership request. o Multicast group address field would be translated to IGMP / MLD group address. Sajassi, et al. Expires September 23, 2022 [Page 23] Internet-Draft IGMP and MLD Proxy for EVPN March 2022 o If Multicast source length is set to zero it would be translated to any source (*). If multicast source length is non zero, Multicast source address field would be translated to IGMP / MLD source address. o If flag bit 7 is set, it translates Membership report to be IGMP V1 or MLD V1. o If flag bit 6 is set, it translates Membership report to be IGMP V2 or MLD V2. o Flag bit 5 is only valid for IGMP Membership report and if it is set, it translates to IGMP V3 report. o If IE flag is set, it translate to IGMP / MLD Exclude mode membership report. If IE flag is not set (zero), it translates to Include mode membership report. 9.3. Multicast Leave Synch Route This EVPN route type is used to coordinate IGMP Leave Group (x,G) state for a given BD between the PEs attached to a given ES operating in All-Active (or Single-Active) redundancy mode and it consists of following: Sajassi, et al. Expires September 23, 2022 [Page 24] Internet-Draft IGMP and MLD Proxy for EVPN March 2022 +--------------------------------------------------+ | RD (8 octets) | +--------------------------------------------------+ | Ethernet Segment Identifier (10 octets) | +--------------------------------------------------+ | Ethernet Tag ID (4 octets) | +--------------------------------------------------+ | Multicast Source Length (1 octet) | +--------------------------------------------------+ | Multicast Source Address (variable) | +--------------------------------------------------+ | Multicast Group Length (1 octet) | +--------------------------------------------------+ | Multicast Group Address (Variable) | +--------------------------------------------------+ | Originator Router Length (1 octet) | +--------------------------------------------------+ | Originator Router Address (variable) | +--------------------------------------------------+ | Reserved (4 octet) | +--------------------------------------------------+ | Maximum Response Time (1 octet) | +--------------------------------------------------+ | Flags (1 octet) | +--------------------------------------------------+ For the purpose of BGP route key processing, all the fields are considered to be part of the prefix in the NLRI except for the Reserved, Maximum Response Time and the one-octet Flags field, whose fields are defined as follows: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+ | reserved |IE|v3|v2|v1| +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+ o The least significant bit, bit 7 indicates support for IGMP version 1. o The second least significant bit, bit 6 indicates support for IGMP version 2. o The third least significant bit, bit 5 indicates support for IGMP version 3. Sajassi, et al. Expires September 23, 2022 [Page 25] Internet-Draft IGMP and MLD Proxy for EVPN March 2022 o The fourth least significant bit, bit 4 indicates whether the (S, G) information carried within the route-type is of Include Group type (bit value 0) or an Exclude Group type (bit value 1). The Exclude Group type bit MUST be ignored if bit 5 is not set. o Reserved bits MUST be set to 0. They can be defined in future by other document. The Flags field assists in distributing IGMP Membership Report of a given host for a given multicast route. The version bits help associate IGMP version of receivers participating within the EVPN domain. The include/exclude bit helps in creating filters for a given multicast route. If route is being prepared for IPv6 (MLD) then bit 7 indicates support for MLD version 1. The second least significant bit, bit 6 indicates support for MLD version 2. Since there is no MLD version 3, in case of IPv6 route third least significant bit MUST be 0. In case of IPv6 route, the fourth least significant bit MUST be ignored if bit 6 is not set. Reserved bits in flag MUST be set to 0. They can be defined in future by other document. 9.3.1. Constructing the Multicast Leave Synch Route This section describes the procedures used to construct the IGMP Leave Synch route. Support for these route types is optional. If a PE does not support this route, then it MUST NOT indicate that it supports 'IGMP proxy' in Multicast Flag extended community for the EVIs corresponding to its multi-homed Ethernet Segments. An IGMP Leave Synch route MUST carry exactly one ES-Import Route Target extended community, the one that corresponds to the ES on which the IGMP Leave was received. It MUST also carry exactly one EVI-RT EC, the one that corresponds to the EVI on which the IGMP Leave was received. See Section 9.5 for details on how to form the EVI-RT EC. The Route Distinguisher (RD) SHOULD be a Type 1 RD [RFC4364]. The value field comprises an IP address of the PE (typically, the loopback address) followed by a number unique to the PE. The Ethernet Segment Identifier (ESI) MUST be set to the 10-octet value defined for the ES. The Ethernet Tag ID MUST be set as per procedure defined in [RFC7432]. Sajassi, et al. Expires September 23, 2022 [Page 26] Internet-Draft IGMP and MLD Proxy for EVPN March 2022 The Multicast Source length MUST be set to length of multicast source address in bits. If the Multicast Source field contains an IPv4 address, then the value of the Multicast Source Length field is 32. If the Multicast Source field contains an IPv6 address, then the value of the Multicast Source Length field is 128. In case of a (*,G) Membership Report, the Multicast Source Length is set to 0. The Multicast Source is the Source IP address of the IGMP Membership Report. In case of a (*,G) Membership Report, this field does not exist. The Multicast Group length MUST be set to length of multicast group address in bits. If the Multicast Group field contains an IPv4 address, then the value of the Multicast Group Length field is 32. If the Multicast Group field contains an IPv6 address, then the value of the Multicast Group Length field is 128. The Multicast Group is the Group address of the IGMP Membership Report. The Originator Router Length is the length of the Originator Router address in bits. The Originator Router Address is the IP address of Router Originating the prefix. Reserved field is not part of the route key. The originator MUST set the reserved field to Zero , the receiver SHOULD ignore it and if it needs to be propagated, it MUST propagate it unchanged Maximum Response Time is value to be used while sending query as defined in [RFC2236] The Flags field indicates the version of IGMP protocol from which the Membership Report was received. It also indicates whether the multicast group had INCLUDE or EXCLUDE bit set. 9.3.2. Reconstructing IGMP / MLD Leave from Multicast Leave Sync Route This section describes the procedures used to reconstruct IGMP / MLD Leave from Multicast Leave Sync route. o If multicast group length is 32, route would be translated to IGMP Leave. If multicast group length is 128, route would be translated to MLD Leave. o Multicast group address field would be translated to IGMP / MLD group address. Sajassi, et al. Expires September 23, 2022 [Page 27] Internet-Draft IGMP and MLD Proxy for EVPN March 2022 o If Multicast source length is set to zero it would be translated to any source (*). If multicast source length is non zero, Multicast source address field would be translated to IGMP / MLD source address. o If flag bit 7 is set, it translates Membership report to be IGMP V1 or MLD V1. o If flag bit 6 is set, it translates Membership report to be IGMP V2 or MLD V2. o Flag bit 5 is only valid for IGMP Membership report and if it is set, it translates to IGMP V3 report. o If IE flag is set, it translate to IGMP / MLD Exclude mode Leave. If IE flag is not set (zero), it translates to Include mode Leave. o 9.4. Multicast Flags Extended Community The 'Multicast Flags' extended community is a new EVPN extended community. EVPN extended communities are transitive extended communities with a Type field value of 6. IANA will assign a Sub- Type from the 'EVPN Extended Community Sub-Types' registry. A PE that supports IGMP and/or MLD Proxy on a given BD MUST attach this extended community to the IMET route it advertises advertises for that BD and it MUST set the IGMP and/or MLD Proxy Support flags to 1. Note that an [RFC7432] compliant PE will not advertise this extended community so its absence indicates that the advertising PE does not support either IGMP or MLD Proxy. The advertisement of this extended community enables more efficient multicast tunnel setup from the source PE specially for ingress replication - i.e., if an egress PE supports IGMP proxy but doesn't have any interest in a given (x,G), it advertises its IGMP proxy capability using this extended community but it does not advertise any SMET route for that (x,G). When the source PE (ingress PE) receives such advertisements from the egress PE, it does not replicate the multicast traffic to that egress PE; however, it does replicate the multicast traffic to the egress PEs that don't advertise such capability even if they don't have any interests in that (x,G). A Multicast Flags extended community is encoded as an 8-octet value, as follows: Sajassi, et al. Expires September 23, 2022 [Page 28] Internet-Draft IGMP and MLD Proxy for EVPN March 2022 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Type=0x06 |Sub-Type=0x09 | Flags (2 Octets) |M|I| +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Reserved=0 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ The low-order (lease significant) two bits are defined as the "IGMP Proxy Support and MLD Proxy Support" bit. The absence of this extended community also means that the PE does not support IGMP proxy. where: o Type is 0x06 as registered with IANA for EVPN Extended Communities. o Sub-Type : 0x09 o Flags are two Octets value. * Bit 15 (shown as I) defines IGMP Proxy Support. Value of 1 for bit 15 means that PE supports IGMP Proxy. Value of 0 for bit 15 means that PE does not supports IGMP Proxy. * Bit 14 (shown as M) defines MLD Proxy Support. Value of 1 for bit 14 means that PE supports MLD Proxy. Value of 0 for bit 14 means that PE does not support MLD proxy. * Bit 0 to 13 are reserved for future. Sender MUST set it 0 and receiver MUST ignore it. o Reserved bits are set to 0. Sender MUST set it to 0 and receiver MUST ignore it. If a router does not support this specification, it MUST NOT add Multicast Flags Extended Community in BGP route. A router receiving BGP update, if M and I both flag are zero (0), the router MUST treat this Update as malformed. Receiver of such update MUST ignore the extended community. 9.5. EVI-RT Extended Community In EVPN, every EVI is associated with one or more Route Targets (RTs). These Route Targets serve two functions: Sajassi, et al. Expires September 23, 2022 [Page 29] Internet-Draft IGMP and MLD Proxy for EVPN March 2022 1. Distribution control: RTs control the distribution of the routes. If a route carries the RT associated with a particular EVI, it will be distributed to all the PEs on which that EVI exists. 2. EVI identification: Once a route has been received by a particular PE, the RT is used to identify the EVI to which it applies. An IGMP Membership Report Synch or IGMP Leave Synch route is associated with a particular combination of ES and EVI. These routes need to be distributed only to PEs that are attached to the associated ES. Therefore these routes carry the ES-Import RT for that ES. Since an IGMP Membership Report Synch or IGMP Leave Synch route does not need to be distributed to all the PEs on which the associated EVI exists, these routes cannot carry the RT associated with that EVI. Therefore, when such a route arrives at a particular PE, the route's RTs cannot be used to identify the EVI to which the route applies. Some other means of associating the route with an EVI must be used. This document specifies four new Extended Communities (EC) that can be used to identify the EVI with which a route is associated, but which do not have any effect on the distribution of the route. These new ECs are known as the "Type 0 EVI-RT EC", the "Type 1 EVI-RT EC", the "Type 2 EVI-RT EC", and the "Type 3 EVI-RT EC". 1. A Type 0 EVI-RT EC is an EVPN EC (type 6) of sub-type 0xA. 2. A Type 1 EVI-RT EC is an EVPN EC (type 6) of sub-type 0xB. 3. A Type 2 EVI-RT EC is an EVPN EC (type 6) of sub-type 0xC. 4. A Type 3 EVI-RT EC is an EVPN EC (type 6) of sub-type 0xD Each IGMP Membership Report Synch or IGMP Leave Synch route MUST carry exactly one EVI-RT EC. The EVI-RT EC carried by a particular route is constructed as follows. Each such route is the result of having received an IGMP Membership Report or an IGMP Leave message from a particular BD. The route is said to be associated with that BD. For each BD, there is a corresponding RT that is used to ensure that routes "about" that BD are distributed to all PEs attached to that BD. So suppose a given IGMP Membership Report Synch or Leave Synch route is associated with a given BD, say BD1, and suppose that the corresponding RT for BD1 is RT1. Then: Sajassi, et al. Expires September 23, 2022 [Page 30] Internet-Draft IGMP and MLD Proxy for EVPN March 2022 o 0. If RT1 is a Transitive Two-Octet AS-specific EC, then the EVI- RT EC carried by the route is a Type 0 EVI-RT EC. The value field of the Type 0 EVI-RT EC is identical to the value field of RT1. o 1. If RT1 is a Transitive IPv4-Address-specific EC, then the EVI- RT EC carried by the route is a Type 1 EVI-RT EC. The value field of the Type 1 EVI-RT EC is identical to the value field of RT1. o 2. If RT1 is a Transitive Four-Octet-specific EC, then the EVI-RT EC carried by the route is a Type 2 EVI-RT EC. The value field of the Type 2 EVI-RT EC is identical to the value field of RT1. o 3. If RT1 is a Transitive IPv6-Address-specific EC, then the EVI- RT EC carried by the route is a Type 3 EVI-RT EC. The value field of the Type 3 EVI-RT EC is identical to the value field of RT1. An IGMP Membership Report Synch or Leave Synch route MUST carry exactly one EVI-RT EC. Suppose a PE receives a particular IGMP Membership Report Synch or IGMP Leave Synch route, say R1, and suppose that R1 carries an ES- Import RT that is one of the PE's Import RTs. If R1 has no EVI-RT EC, or has more than one EVI-RT EC, the PE MUST apply the "treat-as- withdraw" procedure of [RFC7606]. Note that an EVI-RT EC is not a Route Target Extended Community, is not visible to the RT Constrain mechanism [RFC4684], and is not intended to influence the propagation of routes by BGP. 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Type=0x06 | Sub-Type=n | RT associated with EVI | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | RT associated with the EVI (cont.) | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Where the value of 'n' is 0x0A, 0x0B, 0x0C, or 0x0D corresponding to EVI-RT type 0, 1, 2, or 3 respectively. 9.6. Rewriting of RT ECs and EVI-RT ECs by ASBRs There are certain situations in which an ES is attached to a set of PEs that are not all in the same AS, or not all operated by the same provider. In some such situations, the RT that corresponds to a particular EVI may be different in each AS. If a route is propagated Sajassi, et al. Expires September 23, 2022 [Page 31] Internet-Draft IGMP and MLD Proxy for EVPN March 2022 from AS1 to AS2, an ASBR at the AS1/AS2 border may be provisioned with a policy that removes the RTs that are meaningful in AS1 and replaces them with the corresponding (i.e., RTs corresponding to the same EVIs) RTs that are meaningful in AS2. This is known as RT- rewriting. Note that if a given route's RTs are rewritten, and the route carries an EVI-RT EC, the EVI-RT EC needs to be rewritten as well. 9.7. BGP Error Handling If a received BGP update contains Flags not in accordance with IGMP/ MLD version-X expectation, the PE MUST apply the "treat-as-withdraw" procedure as per [RFC7606] If a received BGP update is malformed such that BGP route keys cannot be extracted, then BGP update MUST be considered as invalid. Receiving PE MUST apply the "Session reset" procedure of [RFC7606]. 10. IGMP Version 1 Membership Report This document does not provide any detail about IGMPv1 processing. Implementations are expected to only use IGMPv2 and above for IPv4 and MLDv1 and above for IPv6. IGMPv1 routes are considered invalid and the PE MUST apply the "treat-as-withdraw" procedure as per [RFC7606]. 11. Security Considerations This document describes a means to efficiently operate IGMP and MLD on a subnet constructed across multiple PODs or DCs via an EVPN solution. The security considerations for the operation of the underlying EVPN and BGP substrate are described in [RFC7432], and specific multicast considerations are outlined in [RFC6513] and [RFC6514]. The EVPN and associated IGMP proxy provides a single broadcast domain so the same security considerations of IGMPv2 [RFC2236], [RFC3376], MLD [RFC2710], or MLDv2 [RFC3810] apply. 12. IANA Considerations 12.1. EVPN Extended Community Sub-Types Registrations IANA has allocated the following codepoints from the EVPN Extended Community Sub-Types sub-registry of the BGP Extended Communities registry. Sajassi, et al. Expires September 23, 2022 [Page 32] Internet-Draft IGMP and MLD Proxy for EVPN March 2022 0x09 Multicast Flags Extended Community [this document] 0x0A EVI-RT Type 0 [this document] 0x0B EVI-RT Type 1 [this document] 0x0C EVI-RT Type 2 [this document] IANA is requested to allocate a new codepoint from the EVPN Extended Community sub-types registry for the following. 0x0D EVI-RT Type 3 [this document] 12.2. EVPN Route Type Registration IANA has allocated the following EVPN route types from the EVPN Route Type registry. 6 - Selective Multicast Ethernet Tag Route 7 - Multicast Membership Report Synch Route 8 - Multicast Leave Synch Route 12.3. Multicast Flags Extended Community Registry The Multicast Flags Extended Community contains a 16-bit Flags field. The bits are numbered 0-15, from high-order to low-order. The registry should be initialized as follows: Bit Name Reference Change Controller ---- -------------- ------------- ------------------ 0 - 13 Unassigned 14 MLD Proxy Support This document. IETF 15 IGMP Proxy Support This document IETF The registration policy should be "First Come First Served". 13. Acknowledgement The authors would like to thank Stephane Litkowski, Jorge Rabadan, Anoop Ghanwani, Jeffrey Haas, Krishna Muddenahally Ananthamurthy, Swadesh Agrawal for reviewing and providing valuable comment. Sajassi, et al. Expires September 23, 2022 [Page 33] Internet-Draft IGMP and MLD Proxy for EVPN March 2022 14. Contributors Derek Yeung Arrcus Email: derek@arrcus.com 15. References 15.1. Normative References [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>. [RFC2236] Fenner, W., "Internet Group Management Protocol, Version 2", RFC 2236, DOI 10.17487/RFC2236, November 1997, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2236>. [RFC2710] Deering, S., Fenner, W., and B. Haberman, "Multicast Listener Discovery (MLD) for IPv6", RFC 2710, DOI 10.17487/RFC2710, October 1999, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2710>. [RFC3376] Cain, B., Deering, S., Kouvelas, I., Fenner, B., and A. Thyagarajan, "Internet Group Management Protocol, Version 3", RFC 3376, DOI 10.17487/RFC3376, October 2002, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3376>. [RFC3810] Vida, R., Ed. and L. Costa, Ed., "Multicast Listener Discovery Version 2 (MLDv2) for IPv6", RFC 3810, DOI 10.17487/RFC3810, June 2004, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3810>. [RFC4364] Rosen, E. and Y. Rekhter, "BGP/MPLS IP Virtual Private Networks (VPNs)", RFC 4364, DOI 10.17487/RFC4364, February 2006, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4364>. [RFC4684] Marques, P., Bonica, R., Fang, L., Martini, L., Raszuk, R., Patel, K., and J. Guichard, "Constrained Route Distribution for Border Gateway Protocol/MultiProtocol Label Switching (BGP/MPLS) Internet Protocol (IP) Virtual Private Networks (VPNs)", RFC 4684, DOI 10.17487/RFC4684, November 2006, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4684>. Sajassi, et al. Expires September 23, 2022 [Page 34] Internet-Draft IGMP and MLD Proxy for EVPN March 2022 [RFC6513] Rosen, E., Ed. and R. Aggarwal, Ed., "Multicast in MPLS/ BGP IP VPNs", RFC 6513, DOI 10.17487/RFC6513, February 2012, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6513>. [RFC6514] Aggarwal, R., Rosen, E., Morin, T., and Y. Rekhter, "BGP Encodings and Procedures for Multicast in MPLS/BGP IP VPNs", RFC 6514, DOI 10.17487/RFC6514, February 2012, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6514>. [RFC6625] Rosen, E., Ed., Rekhter, Y., Ed., Hendrickx, W., and R. Qiu, "Wildcards in Multicast VPN Auto-Discovery Routes", RFC 6625, DOI 10.17487/RFC6625, May 2012, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6625>. [RFC7432] Sajassi, A., Ed., Aggarwal, R., Bitar, N., Isaac, A., Uttaro, J., Drake, J., and W. Henderickx, "BGP MPLS-Based Ethernet VPN", RFC 7432, DOI 10.17487/RFC7432, February 2015, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7432>. [RFC7606] Chen, E., Ed., Scudder, J., Ed., Mohapatra, P., and K. Patel, "Revised Error Handling for BGP UPDATE Messages", RFC 7606, DOI 10.17487/RFC7606, August 2015, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7606>. [RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>. 15.2. Informative References [I-D.ietf-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates] Zhang, Z., Lin, W., Rabadan, J., Patel, K., and A. Sajassi, "Updates on EVPN BUM Procedures", draft-ietf- bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-14 (work in progress), November 2021. [RFC4541] Christensen, M., Kimball, K., and F. Solensky, "Considerations for Internet Group Management Protocol (IGMP) and Multicast Listener Discovery (MLD) Snooping Switches", RFC 4541, DOI 10.17487/RFC4541, May 2006, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4541>. Authors' Addresses Sajassi, et al. Expires September 23, 2022 [Page 35] Internet-Draft IGMP and MLD Proxy for EVPN March 2022 Ali Sajassi Cisco Systems 821 Alder Drive, MILPITAS, CALIFORNIA 95035 UNITED STATES Email: sajassi@cisco.com Samir Thoria Cisco Systems 821 Alder Drive, MILPITAS, CALIFORNIA 95035 UNITED STATES Email: sthoria@cisco.com Mankamana Mishra Cisco Systems 821 Alder Drive, MILPITAS, CALIFORNIA 95035 UNITED STATES Email: mankamis@cisco.com Keyur PAtel Arrcus UNITED STATES Email: keyur@arrcus.com John Drake Juniper Networks Email: jdrake@juniper.net Wen Lin Juniper Networks Email: wlin@juniper.net Sajassi, et al. Expires September 23, 2022 [Page 36]