A Network Virtualization Overlay Solution Using Ethernet VPN (EVPN)
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-overlay-12
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 10 and is now closed.
Alvaro Retana Yes
Warren Kumari No Objection
(Adam Roach; former steering group member) No Objection
Please expand the following acronyms upon first use; see https://www.rfc-editor.org/materials/abbrev.expansion.txt for guidance. - VXLAN - NVGRE - POD - GRE - Generic Routing Encapsulation - GENEVE - NV - ARP - Address Resolution Protocol - RR - Resource Record - ECMP - Equal-Cost Multipath - PIM-SM - Protocol Independent Multicast - PIM-SSM - BIDIR-PIM - IP-VRF - LSP - Label Switched Path - iBGP Also, please be consistent about capitalization of "ToR" versus "TOR", "VxLAN" versus "VXLAN", and "NvGRE" versus "NVGRE".
(Alexey Melnikov; former steering group member) No Objection
(Alia Atlas; former steering group member) No Objection
I prefer the comments about Geneve being left in the draft. The other 2 encapsulations are ISE. Geneve will be the Standards Track encapsulation - so I find the framing useful.
(Alissa Cooper; former steering group member) No Objection
(Ben Campbell; former steering group member) No Objection
(Benoît Claise; former steering group member) No Objection
(Deborah Brungard; former steering group member) No Objection
(Kathleen Moriarty; former steering group member) No Objection
(Mirja Kühlewind; former steering group member) No Objection
(Spencer Dawkins; former steering group member) No Objection
Both the Abstract and Introduction contain text like this: This specification is also applicable to GENEVE encapsulation; however, some incremental work is required which will be covered in a separate document. and the Introduction references draft-boutros-bess-evpn-geneve-00.txt, which looks like an individual -00 draft. I wonder if it would be better to drop the promise from this document, and make the relationship clear in whatever version of draft-boutros-bess-evpn-geneve is published. I'm fine with the working group publishing this draft with the promise included, but wanted to ask while we're reviewing it, rather than later.
(Suresh Krishnan; former steering group member) No Objection