Skip to main content

A Network Virtualization Overlay Solution Using Ethernet VPN (EVPN)
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-overlay-12

Yes

Alvaro Retana

No Objection

Warren Kumari
(Alexey Melnikov)
(Alissa Cooper)
(Ben Campbell)
(Benoît Claise)
(Deborah Brungard)
(Kathleen Moriarty)
(Mirja Kühlewind)
(Suresh Krishnan)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 10 and is now closed.

Alvaro Retana Yes

Warren Kumari No Objection

(Adam Roach; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2018-01-10 for -10)
Please expand the following acronyms upon first use; see https://www.rfc-editor.org/materials/abbrev.expansion.txt for guidance.

 - VXLAN
 - NVGRE
 - POD
 - GRE - Generic Routing Encapsulation
 - GENEVE
 - NV
 - ARP - Address Resolution Protocol
 - RR - Resource Record
 - ECMP - Equal-Cost Multipath
 - PIM-SM - Protocol Independent Multicast
 - PIM-SSM
 - BIDIR-PIM
 - IP-VRF
 - LSP - Label Switched Path
 - iBGP

Also, please be consistent about capitalization of "ToR" versus "TOR", "VxLAN" versus "VXLAN", and "NvGRE" versus "NVGRE".

(Alexey Melnikov; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -10)

                            

(Alia Atlas; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2018-01-09 for -10)
I prefer the comments about Geneve being left in the draft.
The other 2 encapsulations are ISE.  Geneve will be the Standards
Track encapsulation - so I find the framing useful.

(Alissa Cooper; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -10)

                            

(Ben Campbell; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -10)

                            

(Benoît Claise; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -10)

                            

(Deborah Brungard; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -10)

                            

(Kathleen Moriarty; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -10)

                            

(Mirja Kühlewind; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -10)

                            

(Spencer Dawkins; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2017-12-29 for -10)
Both the Abstract and Introduction contain text like this:

   This specification is also applicable to GENEVE encapsulation;
   however, some incremental work is required which will be covered in a
   separate document.

and the Introduction references draft-boutros-bess-evpn-geneve-00.txt, which looks like an individual -00 draft. I wonder if it would be better to drop the promise from this document, and make the relationship clear in whatever version of draft-boutros-bess-evpn-geneve is published. 

I'm fine with the working group publishing this draft with the promise included, but wanted to ask while we're reviewing it, rather than later.

(Suresh Krishnan; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -10)