%% You should probably cite rfc9541 instead of this I-D. @techreport{ietf-bess-pbb-evpn-isid-cmacflush-00, number = {draft-ietf-bess-pbb-evpn-isid-cmacflush-00}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-pbb-evpn-isid-cmacflush/00/}, author = {Jorge Rabadan and Senthil Sathappan and Kiran Nagaraj and Masahiro Miyake and Taku Matsuda}, title = {{PBB-EVPN ISID-based CMAC-Flush}}, pagetotal = 10, year = 2019, month = oct, day = 15, abstract = {Provider Backbone Bridging (PBB) can be combined with Ethernet VPN (EVPN) to deploy ELAN services in very large MPLS networks (PBB- EVPN). Single-Active Multi-homing and per-ISID Load-Balancing can be provided to access devices and aggregation networks. In order to speed up the network convergence in case of failures on Single-Active Multi-Homed Ethernet Segments, PBB-EVPN defines a CMAC-Flush mechanism that works for different Ethernet Segment BMAC address allocation models. This document complements those CMAC-Flush procedures for cases in which no PBB-EVPN Ethernet Segments are defined (ESI 0) and an ISID-based CMAC-Flush granularity is desired.}, }