Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) for IPv4 and IPv6 (Single Hop)
draft-ietf-bfd-v4v6-1hop-11
Yes
(Ross Callon)
No Objection
(Chris Newman)
(Cullen Jennings)
(Dan Romascanu)
(Jari Arkko)
(Jon Peterson)
(Lars Eggert)
(Lisa Dusseault)
(Mark Townsley)
(Ron Bonica)
(Tim Polk)
Recuse
(David Ward)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 11 and is now closed.
Ross Callon Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Chris Newman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Cullen Jennings Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Dan Romascanu Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Jon Peterson Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Lars Eggert Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Lisa Dusseault Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Mark Townsley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Pasi Eronen Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2009-02-12)
Unknown
I agree with Jari's discuss. Although ports 3784 and 3785 have already been assigned by IANA, it would be useful to say so in the IANA considerations section.
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2008-06-05)
Unknown
The title page header should indicate that the intended status for this document: Proposed Standard. The Gen-ART Review by Christian Vogt and the SecDir Review by Radia Perlman both point out the need to clairify the second paragraph in section 2, whihc says: > > Each BFD session between a pair of systems MUST traverse a > separate path in both directions. > Please update this sentence before the document is published as an RFC.
Tim Polk Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
David Ward Former IESG member
Recuse
Recuse
()
Unknown