YANG Data Model for Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD)
draft-ietf-bfd-yang-07
The information below is for an old version of the document.
| Document | Type | Active Internet-Draft (bfd WG) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Reshad Rahman , Lianshu Zheng , Mahesh Jethanandani , Santosh Pallagatti , Greg Mirsky | ||
| Last updated | 2017-10-30 | ||
| Replaces | draft-zheng-bfd-yang | ||
| Stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
| Formats | plain text htmlized pdfized bibtex | ||
| Reviews |
RTGDIR Last Call review
(of
-09)
Has Issues
YANGDOCTORS Last Call review
(of
-09)
Not Ready
|
||
| Stream | WG state | WG Document | |
| Document shepherd | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | I-D Exists | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
draft-ietf-bfd-yang-07
Network Working Group R. Rahman, Ed.
Internet-Draft Cisco Systems
Intended status: Standards Track L. Zheng, Ed.
Expires: May 3, 2018 Huawei Technologies
M. Jethanandani, Ed.
Cisco Systems
S. Pallagatti
G. Mirsky
ZTE Corporation
October 30, 2017
YANG Data Model for Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD)
draft-ietf-bfd-yang-07.txt
Abstract
This document defines a YANG data model that can be used to configure
and manage Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD).
Requirements Language
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on May 3, 2018.
Rahman, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft BFD YANG October 2017
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2017 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2. Design of the Data Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2.1. Design of Configuration Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
2.1.1. Common BFD configuration parameters . . . . . . . . . 5
2.1.2. Single-hop IP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
2.1.3. Multi-hop IP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
2.1.4. MPLS Traffic Engineering Tunnels . . . . . . . . . . 7
2.1.5. MPLS Label Switched Paths . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
2.1.6. Link Aggregation Groups . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
2.2. Design of Operational Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
2.3. Notifications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
2.4. RPC Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
2.5. BFD top level hierarchy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
2.6. BFD IP single-hop hierarchy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
2.7. BFD IP multi-hop hierarchy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
2.8. BFD over LAG hierarchy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
2.9. BFD over MPLS LSPs hierarchy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
2.10. BFD over MPLS-TE hierarchy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
2.11. Interaction with other YANG modules . . . . . . . . . . . 20
2.11.1. Module ietf-interfaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
2.11.2. Module ietf-ip . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
2.11.3. Module ietf-mpls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
2.11.4. Module ietf-te . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
2.12. IANA BFD YANG Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
2.13. BFD types YANG Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
2.14. BFD top-level YANG Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
2.15. BFD IP single-hop YANG Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
2.16. BFD IP multi-hop YANG Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
2.17. BFD over LAG YANG Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
2.18. BFD over MPLS YANG Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
2.19. BFD over MPLS-TE YANG Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
Rahman, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft BFD YANG October 2017
2.20. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
2.21. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
2.21.1. IANA-Maintained iana-bfd-types module . . . . . . . 53
2.22. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53
3. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53
3.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53
3.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
Appendix A. Echo function configuration example . . . . . . . . 55
A.1. Example YANG module for BFD echo function . . . . . . . . 56
Appendix B. BFD client configuration example . . . . . . . . . . 58
B.1. Example YANG module for BFD client . . . . . . . . . . . 58
Appendix C. Change log . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60
C.1. Changes between versions -06 and -07 . . . . . . . . . . 60
C.2. Changes between versions -05 and -06 . . . . . . . . . . 61
C.3. Changes between versions -04 and -05 . . . . . . . . . . 61
C.4. Changes between versions -03 and -04 . . . . . . . . . . 61
C.5. Changes between versions -02 and -03 . . . . . . . . . . 61
C.6. Changes between versions -01 and -02 . . . . . . . . . . 61
C.7. Changes between versions -00 and -01 . . . . . . . . . . 61
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
1. Introduction
This document defines a YANG data model that can be used to configure
and manage Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) [RFC5880]. BFD
is a network protocol which is used for liveness detection of
arbitrary paths between systems. Some examples of different types of
paths over which we have BFD:
1) Two systems directly connected via IP. This is known as BFD over
single-hop IP, a.k.a. BFD for IPv4 and IPv6 [RFC5881]
2) Two systems connected via multiple hops as described in BFD for
Multiple Hops. [RFC5883]
3) Two systems connected via MPLS Label Switched Paths (LSPs) as
described in BFD for MPLS LSP [RFC5884]
4) Two systems connected via a Link Aggregation Group (LAG) interface
as described in BFD on LAG Interfaces [RFC7130]
5) Two systems connected via pseudowires (PWs), this is known as
Virtual Circuit Connectivity Verification (VCCV) as described in BFD
for PW VCCV [RFC5885]. This is not addressed in this document.
BFD typically does not operate on its own. Various control
protocols, also known as BFD clients, use the services provided by
BFD for their own operation as described in Generic Application of
Rahman, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft BFD YANG October 2017
BFD [RFC5882]. The obvious candidates which use BFD are those which
do not have "hellos" to detect failures, e.g. static routes, and
routing protocols whose "hellos" do not support sub-second failure
detection, e.g. OSPF and IS-IS.
2. Design of the Data Model
Since BFD is used for liveliness detection of various forwarding
paths, there is no uniform key to identify a BFD session. So the BFD
data model is split in multiple YANG modules where each module
corresponds to one type of forwarding path. For example, BFD for IP
single-hop is in one YANG module and BFD for MPLS-TE is in another
YANG module. The main difference between these modules is how a BFD
session is uniquely identified, i.e the key for the list containing
the BFD sessions for that forwarding path. To avoid duplication of
BFD definitions, we have common types and groupings which are used by
all the modules.
A new control-plane protocol "bfdv1" is defined and a "bfd" container
is created under control-plane-protocol as specified in A YANG Data
Model for Routing Management [RFC8022]. This new "bfd" node is
augmented by all the YANG modules for their respective specific
information.
BFD can operate in the following contexts:
1. Network devices as described in Network Device YANG
Organizational Models [I-D.ietf-rtgwg-device-model]
2. Logical Network Elements as described in YANG Logical Network
Element [I-D.ietf-rtgwg-lne-model]
3. Network instances as described in YANG Logical Network Element
[I-D.ietf-rtgwg-ni-model]
The approach taken is to do a schema-mount (see Schema Mount
[I-D.ietf-netmod-schema-mount]) of the BFD model in the appropriate
locations. For example, if an implementation supports BFD IP multi-
hop in network instances, the implementation would do schema-mount of
the BFD IP multi-hop model in a mount-point which resides in a
network instance.
The data models in this document strive to follow the "Network
Management Datastore Architecture" (NMDA) guidelines described in
[I-D.dsdt-nmda-guidelines]. This means that the data models do NOT
have separate top-level or sibling containers for configuration and
operational data.
Rahman, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft BFD YANG October 2017
2.1. Design of Configuration Model
The configuration model consists mainly of the parameters specified
in BFD [RFC5880]. Some examples are desired minimum transmit
interval, required minimum receive interval, detection multiplier,
etc
BFD clients are applications that use BFD for fast detection of
failures. Some implementations have BFD session configuration under
the BFD clients. For example, BFD session configuration under
routing applications such as OSPF, IS-IS, BGP etc. Other
implementations have BFD session configuration centralized under BFD,
i.e. outside the multiple BFD clients.
The BFD parameters of interest to a BFD client are mainly the
multiplier and interval(s) since those parameters impact the
convergence time of the BFD clients when a failure occurs. Other
parameters such as BFD authentication are not specific to the
requirements of the BFD client. Ideally all configuration should be
centralized under BFD. However, this is a problem for clients of BFD
which auto-discover their peers. For example, IGPs do not have the
peer address configured, instead the IGP is enabled on an interface
and the IGP peers are auto-discovered. So for an operator to
configure BFD to an IGP peer, the operator would first have to
determine the peer addresses. And when a new peer is discovered, BFD
configuration would need to be added. To avoid this issue, we define
grouping client-cfg-parms in Section 2.13 for BFD clients to
configure BFD: this allows BFD clients such as the IGPs to have
configuration (multipler and intervals) for the BFD sessions they
need. The mechanism how the BFD sessions are created by the BFD
clients is outside the scope of this document.
2.1.1. Common BFD configuration parameters
The basic BFD configuration parameters are:
local-multiplier
This is the detection time multiplier as defined in BFD
[RFC5880].
desired-min-tx-interval
This is the Desired Min TX Interval as defined in BFD
[RFC5880].
required-min-rx-interval
This is the Required Min RX Interval as defined in BFD
[RFC5880].
Rahman, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft BFD YANG October 2017
Although BFD [RFC5880] allows for different values for transmit and
receive intervals, some implementations allow users to specify just
one interval which is used for both transmit and receive intervals or
separate values for transmit and receive intervals. The BFD YANG
model supports this: there is a choice between "min-interval", used
for both transmit and receive intervals, and "desired-min-tx-
interval" and "required-min-rx-interval". This is supported via a
grouping which is used by the YANG modules for the various forwarding
paths. For BFD authentication we have:
key-chain
This is a reference to key-chain defined in YANG Data Model
for Key Chains [RFC8177]. The keys, cryptographic algotihms,
key lifetime etc are all defined in the key-chain model.
replay-protection
This specifies meticulous v/s non-meticulous mode as per BFD
[RFC5880].
2.1.2. Single-hop IP
For single-hop IP, there is an augment of the "bfd" data node in
Section 2. The "ip-sh" node contains a list of IP single-hop
sessions where each session is uniquely identified by the interface
and destination address pair. For the configuration parameters we
use what is defined in Section 2.1.1
[RFC5880] and [RFC5881] do not specify whether echo function is
continuous or on demand. Therefore the mechanism used to start and
stop echo function is implementation specific and should be done by
augmentation:
1) Configuration. This is suitable for continuous echo function.
An example is provided in Appendix A.
2) RPC. This is suitable for on-demand echo function.
2.1.3. Multi-hop IP
For multi-hop IP, there is an augment of the "bfd" data node in
Section 2.
Because of multiple paths, there could be multiple multi-hop IP
sessions between a source and a destination address. We identify
this as a "session-group". The key for each "session-group" consists
of:
source address
Rahman, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft BFD YANG October 2017
Address belonging to the local system as per BFD for Multiple
Hops [RFC5883]
destination address
Address belonging to the remote system as per BFD for
Multiple Hops [RFC5883]
For the configuration parameters we use what is defined in
Section 2.1.1
Here are some extra parameters:
tx-ttl
TTL of outgoing BFD control packets.
rx-ttl
Minimum TTL of incoming BFD control packets.
2.1.4. MPLS Traffic Engineering Tunnels
For MPLS-TE tunnels, BFD is configured under the MPLS-TE tunnel since
the desired failure detection parameters is a property of the MPLS-TE
tunnel. This is achieved by augmenting the MPLS-TE data model in
YANG Data Model for TE Topologies [I-D.ietf-teas-yang-te]. For BFD
parameters which are specific to the TE application, e.g. whether to
tear down the tunnel in the event of a BFD session failure, these
parameters will be defined in the YANG model of the MPLS-TE
application.
On top of the usual BFD parameters, we have the following per MPLS-TE
tunnel:
encap
Encapsulation for the BFD packets: choice between IP, G-ACh
and IP with G-ACh as per MPLS Generic Associated Channel
[RFC5586]
For general MPLS-TE data, "mpls-te" data node is added under the
"bfd" node in Section 2. Since some MPLS-TE tunnels are uni-
directional there is no MPLS-TE configuration for these tunnels on
the egress node (note that this does not apply to bi-directional
MPLS-TP tunnels). The BFD parameters for the egress node are added
under "mpls-te".
Rahman, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft BFD YANG October 2017
2.1.5. MPLS Label Switched Paths
Here we address MPLS LSPs whose FEC is an IP address. The "bfd" node
in Section 2 is augmented with "mpls" which contains a list of
sessions uniquely identified by an IP prefix. Because of multiple
paths, there could be multiple MPLS sessions to an MPLS FEC. We
identify this as a "session-group".
Since these LSPs are uni-directional there is no LSP configuration on
the egress node.
The BFD parameters for the egress node are added under "mpls".
2.1.6. Link Aggregation Groups
Per BFD on LAG Interfaces [RFC7130], configuring BFD on LAG consists
of having micro-BFD sessions on each LAG member link. Since the BFD
parameters are an attribute of the LAG, they should be under the LAG.
However there is no LAG YANG model which we can augment. So a "lag"
data node is added to the "bfd" node in Section 2, the configuration
is per-LAG: we have a list of LAGs. The destination IP address of
the micro-BFD sessions is configured per-LAG and per address-family
(IPv4 and IPv6)
2.2. Design of Operational Model
The operational model contains both the overall statistics of BFD
sessions running on the device and the per session operational
information.
The overall statistics of BFD sessions consist of number of BFD
sessions, number of BFD sessions up etc. This information is
available globally (i.e. for all BFD sessions) under the "bfd" node
in Section 2 and also per type of forwarding path.
For each BFD session, mainly three categories of operational items
are shown. The fundamental information of a BFD session such as the
local discriminator, remote discriminator and the capability of
supporting demand detect mode are shown in the first category. The
second category includes a BFD session running information, e.g. the
remote BFD state and the diagnostic code received. Another example
is the actual transmit interval between the control packets, which
may be different from the desired minimum transmit interval
configured, is shown in this category. Similar examples are actual
received interval between the control packets and the actual transmit
interval between the echo packets. The third category contains the
detailed statistics of the session, e.g. when the session
transitioned up/down and how long it has been in that state.
Rahman, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft BFD YANG October 2017
For some session types, there may be more than 1 session on the
virtual path to the destination. For example, with IP multi-hop and
MPLS LSPs, there could be multiple BFD sessions from the source to
the same destination to test the various paths (ECMP) to the
destination. This is represented by having multiple "sessions" under
each "session-group".
2.3. Notifications
This YANG model defines notifications to inform clients of BFD of
important events detected during the protocol operation. Pair of
local and remote discriminator identifies a BFD session on local
system. Notifications also give more important details about BFD
sessions; e.g. new state, time in previous state, network-instance
and the reason that the BFD session state changed. The notifications
are defined for each type of forwarding path but use groupings for
common information.
2.4. RPC Operations
None.
2.5. BFD top level hierarchy
At the "bfd" node under control-plane-protocol, there is no
configuration data, only operational data. The operational data
consist of overall BFD session statistics, i.e. for BFD on all types
of forwarding paths. The "bfd" node under control-plane-protocol can
be used in a network device (top-level), or mounted in an LNE or in a
network instance.
module: ietf-bfd
augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols
/rt:control-plane-protocol:
+--rw bfd
+--ro session-statistics
+--ro session-count? uint32
+--ro session-up-count? uint32
+--ro session-down-count? uint32
+--ro session-admin-down-count? uint32
2.6. BFD IP single-hop hierarchy
An "ip-sh" node is added under "bfd" node in control-plane-protocol.
The configuration and operational data for each BFD IP single-hop
session is under this "ip-sh" node. The "ip-sh" node can be used in
a network device (top-level), or mounted in an LNE or in a network
instance.
Rahman, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft BFD YANG October 2017
module: ietf-bfd-ip-sh
augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols
/rt:control-plane-protocol/bfd:bfd:
+--rw ip-sh
+--ro session-statistics
| +--ro session-count? uint32
| +--ro session-up-count? uint32
| +--ro session-down-count? uint32
| +--ro session-admin-down-count? uint32
+--rw sessions* [interface dest-addr]
+--rw interface if:interface-ref
+--rw dest-addr inet:ip-address
+--rw source-addr? inet:ip-address
+--rw local-multiplier? multiplier
+--rw (interval-config-type)?
| +--:(tx-rx-intervals)
| | +--rw desired-min-tx-interval uint32
| | +--rw required-min-rx-interval uint32
| +--:(single-interval)
| +--rw min-interval uint32
+--rw demand-enabled? boolean {demand-mode}?
+--rw admin-down? boolean
+--rw authentication-parms! {authentication}?
| +--rw key-chain? kc:key-chain-ref
| +--rw replay-protection? identityref
+--ro path-type? identityref
+--ro ip-encapsulation? boolean
+--ro local-discriminator? discriminator
+--ro remote-discriminator? discriminator
+--ro remote-multiplier? multiplier
+--ro demand-capability? boolean {demand-mode}?
+--ro source-port? inet:port-number
+--ro dest-port? inet:port-number
+--ro session-running
| +--ro session-index? uint32
| +--ro local-state? state
| +--ro remote-state? state
| +--ro local-diagnostic?
| | iana-bfd-types:diagnostic
| +--ro remote-diagnostic?
| | iana-bfd-types:diagnostic
| +--ro remote-authenticated? boolean
| +--ro remote-authentication-type? iana-bfd-types:auth-ty
pe
| | {authentication}?
| +--ro detection-mode? enumeration
| +--ro negotiated-tx-interval? uint32
| +--ro negotiated-rx-interval? uint32
Rahman, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft BFD YANG October 2017
| +--ro detection-time? uint32
| +--ro echo-tx-interval-in-use? uint32 {echo-mode}?
+--ro sesssion-statistics
+--ro create-time? yang:date-and-time
+--ro last-down-time? yang:date-and-time
+--ro last-up-time? yang:date-and-time
+--ro down-count? uint32
+--ro admin-down-count? uint32
+--ro receive-packet-count? uint64
+--ro send-packet-count? uint64
+--ro receive-bad-packet? uint64
+--ro send-failed-packet? uint64
notifications:
+---n singlehop-notification
+--ro local-discr? discriminator
+--ro remote-discr? discriminator
+--ro new-state? state
+--ro state-change-reason? iana-bfd-types:diagnostic
+--ro time-of-last-state-change? yang:date-and-time
+--ro dest-addr? inet:ip-address
+--ro source-addr? inet:ip-address
+--ro session-index? uint32
+--ro path-type? identityref
+--ro interface? if:interface-ref
+--ro echo-enabled? boolean
2.7. BFD IP multi-hop hierarchy
An "ip-mh" node is added under the "bfd" node in cntrol-plane-
protocol. The configuration and operational data for each BFD IP
multi-hop session is under this "ip-mh" node. In the operational
model we support multiple BFD multi-hop sessions per remote address
(ECMP), the local discriminator is used as key. The "ip-mh" node can
be used in a network device (top-level), or mounted in an LNE or in a
network instance.
module: ietf-bfd-ip-mh
augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols
/rt:control-plane-protocol/bfd:bfd:
+--rw ip-mh
+--ro session-statistics
| +--ro session-count? uint32
| +--ro session-up-count? uint32
| +--ro session-down-count? uint32
| +--ro session-admin-down-count? uint32
+--rw session-group* [source-addr dest-addr]
Rahman, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 11]
Internet-Draft BFD YANG October 2017
+--rw source-addr inet:ip-address
+--rw dest-addr inet:ip-address
+--rw local-multiplier? multiplier
+--rw (interval-config-type)?
| +--:(tx-rx-intervals)
| | +--rw desired-min-tx-interval uint32
| | +--rw required-min-rx-interval uint32
| +--:(single-interval)
| +--rw min-interval uint32
+--rw demand-enabled? boolean {demand-mode}?
+--rw admin-down? boolean
+--rw authentication-parms! {authentication}?
| +--rw key-chain? kc:key-chain-ref
| +--rw replay-protection? identityref
+--rw tx-ttl? bfd-types:hops
+--rw rx-ttl bfd-types:hops
+--ro sessions*
+--ro path-type? identityref
+--ro ip-encapsulation? boolean
+--ro local-discriminator? discriminator
+--ro remote-discriminator? discriminator
+--ro remote-multiplier? multiplier
+--ro demand-capability? boolean {demand-mode}?
+--ro source-port? inet:port-number
+--ro dest-port? inet:port-number
+--ro session-running
| +--ro session-index? uint32
| +--ro local-state? state
| +--ro remote-state? state
| +--ro local-diagnostic?
| | iana-bfd-types:diagnostic
| +--ro remote-diagnostic?
| | iana-bfd-types:diagnostic
| +--ro remote-authenticated? boolean
| +--ro remote-authentication-type?
| | iana-bfd-types:auth-type {authentication}?
| +--ro detection-mode? enumeration
| +--ro negotiated-tx-interval? uint32
| +--ro negotiated-rx-interval? uint32
| +--ro detection-time? uint32
| +--ro echo-tx-interval-in-use? uint32
| {echo-mode}?
+--ro sesssion-statistics
+--ro create-time? yang:date-and-time
+--ro last-down-time? yang:date-and-time
+--ro last-up-time? yang:date-and-time
+--ro down-count? uint32
+--ro admin-down-count? uint32
Rahman, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 12]
Internet-Draft BFD YANG October 2017
+--ro receive-packet-count? uint64
+--ro send-packet-count? uint64
+--ro receive-bad-packet? uint64
+--ro send-failed-packet? uint64
notifications:
+---n multihop-notification
+--ro local-discr? discriminator
+--ro remote-discr? discriminator
+--ro new-state? state
+--ro state-change-reason? iana-bfd-types:diagnostic
+--ro time-of-last-state-change? yang:date-and-time
+--ro dest-addr? inet:ip-address
+--ro source-addr? inet:ip-address
+--ro session-index? uint32
+--ro path-type? identityref
2.8. BFD over LAG hierarchy
A "lag" node is added under the "bfd" node in control-plane-protocol.
The configuration and operational data for each BFD LAG session is
under this "lag" node. The "lag" node can be used in a network
device (top-level), or mounted in an LNE or in a network instance.
module: ietf-bfd-lag
augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols
/rt:control-plane-protocol/bfd:bfd:
+--rw lag
+--rw micro-bfd-ipv4-session-statistics
| +--ro session-statistics
| +--ro session-count? uint32
| +--ro session-up-count? uint32
| +--ro session-down-count? uint32
| +--ro session-admin-down-count? uint32
+--rw micro-bfd-ipv6-session-statistics
| +--ro session-statistics
| +--ro session-count? uint32
| +--ro session-up-count? uint32
| +--ro session-down-count? uint32
| +--ro session-admin-down-count? uint32
+--rw sessions* [lag-name]
+--rw lag-name if:interface-ref
+--rw ipv4-dest-addr? inet:ipv4-address
+--rw ipv6-dest-addr? inet:ipv6-address
+--rw local-multiplier? multiplier
+--rw (interval-config-type)?
| +--:(tx-rx-intervals)
| | +--rw desired-min-tx-interval uint32
Rahman, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 13]
Internet-Draft BFD YANG October 2017
| | +--rw required-min-rx-interval uint32
| +--:(single-interval)
| +--rw min-interval uint32
+--rw demand-enabled? boolean {demand-mode}?
+--rw admin-down? boolean
+--rw authentication-parms! {authentication}?
| +--rw key-chain? kc:key-chain-ref
| +--rw replay-protection? identityref
+--rw use-ipv4? boolean
+--rw use-ipv6? boolean
+--ro member-links* [member-link]
+--ro member-link if:interface-ref
+--ro micro-bfd-ipv4
| +--ro path-type? identityref
| +--ro ip-encapsulation? boolean
| +--ro local-discriminator? discriminator
| +--ro remote-discriminator? discriminator
| +--ro remote-multiplier? multiplier
| +--ro demand-capability? boolean {demand-mode}?
| +--ro source-port? inet:port-number
| +--ro dest-port? inet:port-number
| +--ro session-running
| | +--ro session-index? uint32
| | +--ro local-state? state
| | +--ro remote-state? state
| | +--ro local-diagnostic?
| | | iana-bfd-types:diagnostic
| | +--ro remote-diagnostic?
| | | iana-bfd-types:diagnostic
| | +--ro remote-authenticated? boolean
| | +--ro remote-authentication-type?
| | | iana-bfd-types:auth-type {authentication}?
| | +--ro detection-mode? enumeration
| | +--ro negotiated-tx-interval? uint32
| | +--ro negotiated-rx-interval? uint32
| | +--ro detection-time? uint32
| | +--ro echo-tx-interval-in-use? uint32
| | {echo-mode}?
| +--ro sesssion-statistics
| +--ro create-time? yang:date-and-time
| +--ro last-down-time? yang:date-and-time
| +--ro last-up-time? yang:date-and-time
| +--ro down-count? uint32
| +--ro admin-down-count? uint32
| +--ro receive-packet-count? uint64
| +--ro send-packet-count? uint64
| +--ro receive-bad-packet? uint64
| +--ro send-failed-packet? uint64
Rahman, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 14]
Internet-Draft BFD YANG October 2017
+--ro micro-bfd-ipv6
+--ro path-type? identityref
+--ro ip-encapsulation? boolean
+--ro local-discriminator? discriminator
+--ro remote-discriminator? discriminator
+--ro remote-multiplier? multiplier
+--ro demand-capability? boolean {demand-mode}?
+--ro source-port? inet:port-number
+--ro dest-port? inet:port-number
+--ro session-running
| +--ro session-index? uint32
| +--ro local-state? state
| +--ro remote-state? state
| +--ro local-diagnostic?
| | iana-bfd-types:diagnostic
| +--ro remote-diagnostic?
| | iana-bfd-types:diagnostic
| +--ro remote-authenticated? boolean
| +--ro remote-authentication-type?
| | iana-bfd-types:auth-type {authentication}?
| +--ro detection-mode? enumeration
| +--ro negotiated-tx-interval? uint32
| +--ro negotiated-rx-interval? uint32
| +--ro detection-time? uint32
| +--ro echo-tx-interval-in-use? uint32
| {echo-mode}?
+--ro sesssion-statistics
+--ro create-time? yang:date-and-time
+--ro last-down-time? yang:date-and-time
+--ro last-up-time? yang:date-and-time
+--ro down-count? uint32
+--ro admin-down-count? uint32
+--ro receive-packet-count? uint64
+--ro send-packet-count? uint64
+--ro receive-bad-packet? uint64
+--ro send-failed-packet? uint64
notifications:
+---n lag-notification
+--ro local-discr? discriminator
+--ro remote-discr? discriminator
+--ro new-state? state
+--ro state-change-reason? iana-bfd-types:diagnostic
+--ro time-of-last-state-change? yang:date-and-time
+--ro dest-addr? inet:ip-address
+--ro source-addr? inet:ip-address
+--ro session-index? uint32
+--ro path-type? identityref
Rahman, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 15]
Internet-Draft BFD YANG October 2017
+--ro lag-name? if:interface-ref
+--ro member-link? if:interface-ref
2.9. BFD over MPLS LSPs hierarchy
An "mpls" node is added under the "bfd" node in control-plane-
protocol. The configuration is per MPLS FEC under this "mpls" node.
In the operational model we support multiple BFD sessions per MPLS
FEC (ECMP), the local discriminator is used as key. The "mpls" node
can be used in a network device (top-level), or mounted in an LNE or
in a network instance.
module: ietf-bfd-mpls
augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols
/rt:control-plane-protocol/bfd:bfd:
+--rw mpls
+--ro session-statistics
| +--ro session-count? uint32
| +--ro session-up-count? uint32
| +--ro session-down-count? uint32
| +--ro session-admin-down-count? uint32
+--rw egress
| +--rw enable? boolean
| +--rw local-multiplier? multiplier
| +--rw (interval-config-type)?
| | +--:(tx-rx-intervals)
| | | +--rw desired-min-tx-interval uint32
| | | +--rw required-min-rx-interval uint32
| | +--:(single-interval)
| | +--rw min-interval uint32
| +--rw authentication-parms! {authentication}?
| +--rw key-chain? kc:key-chain-ref
| +--rw replay-protection? identityref
+--rw session-group* [mpls-fec]
+--rw mpls-fec inet:ip-prefix
+--rw local-multiplier? multiplier
+--rw (interval-config-type)?
| +--:(tx-rx-intervals)
| | +--rw desired-min-tx-interval uint32
| | +--rw required-min-rx-interval uint32
| +--:(single-interval)
| +--rw min-interval uint32
+--rw demand-enabled? boolean {demand-mode}?
+--rw admin-down? boolean
+--rw authentication-parms! {authentication}?
| +--rw key-chain? kc:key-chain-ref
| +--rw replay-protection? identityref
+--ro sessions*
Rahman, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 16]
Internet-Draft BFD YANG October 2017
+--ro path-type? identityref
+--ro ip-encapsulation? boolean
+--ro local-discriminator? discriminator
+--ro remote-discriminator? discriminator
+--ro remote-multiplier? multiplier
+--ro demand-capability? boolean {demand-mode}?
+--ro source-port? inet:port-number
+--ro dest-port? inet:port-number
+--ro session-running
| +--ro session-index? uint32
| +--ro local-state? state
| +--ro remote-state? state
| +--ro local-diagnostic?
| | iana-bfd-types:diagnostic
| +--ro remote-diagnostic?
| | iana-bfd-types:diagnostic
| +--ro remote-authenticated? boolean
| +--ro remote-authentication-type?
| | iana-bfd-types:auth-type {authentication}?
| +--ro detection-mode? enumeration
| +--ro negotiated-tx-interval? uint32
| +--ro negotiated-rx-interval? uint32
| +--ro detection-time? uint32
| +--ro echo-tx-interval-in-use? uint32
| {echo-mode}?
+--ro sesssion-statistics
| +--ro create-time? yang:date-and-time
| +--ro last-down-time? yang:date-and-time
| +--ro last-up-time? yang:date-and-time
| +--ro down-count? uint32
| +--ro admin-down-count? uint32
| +--ro receive-packet-count? uint64
| +--ro send-packet-count? uint64
| +--ro receive-bad-packet? uint64
| +--ro send-failed-packet? uint64
+--ro mpls-dest-address? inet:ip-address
notifications:
+---n mpls-notification
+--ro local-discr? discriminator
+--ro remote-discr? discriminator
+--ro new-state? state
+--ro state-change-reason? iana-bfd-types:diagnostic
+--ro time-of-last-state-change? yang:date-and-time
+--ro dest-addr? inet:ip-address
+--ro source-addr? inet:ip-address
+--ro session-index? uint32
+--ro path-type? identityref
Rahman, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 17]
Internet-Draft BFD YANG October 2017
+--ro mpls-dest-address? inet:ip-address
2.10. BFD over MPLS-TE hierarchy
YANG Data Model for TE Topologies [I-D.ietf-teas-yang-te] is
augmented. BFD is configured per MPLS-TE tunnel, and BFD session
operational data is provided per MPLS-TE LSP.
module: ietf-bfd-mpls-te
augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols
/rt:control-plane-protocol/bfd:bfd:
+--rw mpls-te
+--rw egress
| +--rw enable? boolean
| +--rw local-multiplier? multiplier
| +--rw (interval-config-type)?
| | +--:(tx-rx-intervals)
| | | +--rw desired-min-tx-interval uint32
| | | +--rw required-min-rx-interval uint32
| | +--:(single-interval)
| | +--rw min-interval uint32
| +--rw authentication-parms! {authentication}?
| +--rw key-chain? kc:key-chain-ref
| +--rw replay-protection? identityref
+--ro session-statistics
+--ro session-count? uint32
+--ro session-up-count? uint32
+--ro session-down-count? uint32
+--ro session-admin-down-count? uint32
augment /te:te/te:tunnels/te:tunnel:
+--rw local-multiplier? multiplier
+--rw (interval-config-type)?
| +--:(tx-rx-intervals)
| | +--rw desired-min-tx-interval uint32
| | +--rw required-min-rx-interval uint32
| +--:(single-interval)
| +--rw min-interval uint32
+--rw demand-enabled? boolean {demand-mode}?
+--rw admin-down? boolean
+--rw authentication-parms! {authentication}?
| +--rw key-chain? kc:key-chain-ref
| +--rw replay-protection? identityref
+--rw encap? identityref
augment /te:te/te:lsps-state/te:lsp:
+--ro path-type? identityref
+--ro ip-encapsulation? boolean
+--ro local-discriminator? discriminator
+--ro remote-discriminator? discriminator
Rahman, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 18]
Internet-Draft BFD YANG October 2017
+--ro remote-multiplier? multiplier
+--ro demand-capability? boolean {demand-mode}?
+--ro source-port? inet:port-number
+--ro dest-port? inet:port-number
+--ro session-running
| +--ro session-index? uint32
| +--ro local-state? state
| +--ro remote-state? state
| +--ro local-diagnostic? iana-bfd-types:diagnostic
| +--ro remote-diagnostic? iana-bfd-types:diagnostic
| +--ro remote-authenticated? boolean
| +--ro remote-authentication-type? iana-bfd-types:auth-type
| | {authentication}?
| +--ro detection-mode? enumeration
| +--ro negotiated-tx-interval? uint32
| +--ro negotiated-rx-interval? uint32
| +--ro detection-time? uint32
| +--ro echo-tx-interval-in-use? uint32 {echo-mode}?
+--ro sesssion-statistics
| +--ro create-time? yang:date-and-time
| +--ro last-down-time? yang:date-and-time
| +--ro last-up-time? yang:date-and-time
| +--ro down-count? uint32
| +--ro admin-down-count? uint32
| +--ro receive-packet-count? uint64
| +--ro send-packet-count? uint64
| +--ro receive-bad-packet? uint64
| +--ro send-failed-packet? uint64
+--ro mpls-dest-address? inet:ip-address
notifications:
+---n mpls-te-notification
+--ro local-discr? discriminator
+--ro remote-discr? discriminator
+--ro new-state? state
+--ro state-change-reason? iana-bfd-types:diagnostic
+--ro time-of-last-state-change? yang:date-and-time
+--ro dest-addr? inet:ip-address
+--ro source-addr? inet:ip-address
+--ro session-index? uint32
+--ro path-type? identityref
+--ro mpls-dest-address? inet:ip-address
+--ro tunnel-name? string
Rahman, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 19]
Internet-Draft BFD YANG October 2017
2.11. Interaction with other YANG modules
Generic YANG Data Model for Connectionless OAM protocols
[I-D.ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam] describes how the LIME
connectionless OAM model could be extended to support BFD.
Also, the operation of the BFD data model depends on configuration
parameters that are defined in other YANG modules.
2.11.1. Module ietf-interfaces
The following boolean configuration is defined in A YANG Data Model
for Interface Management [RFC7223]:
/if:interfaces/if:interface/if:enabled
If this configuration is set to "false", no BFD packets can
be transmitted or received on that interface.
2.11.2. Module ietf-ip
The following boolean configuration is defined in A YANG Data Model
for IP Management [RFC7277]:
/if:interfaces/if:interface/ip:ipv4/ip:enabled
If this configuration is set to "false", no BFD IPv4 packets
can be transmitted or received on that interface.
/if:interfaces/if:interface/ip:ipv4/ip:forwarding
If this configuration is set to "false", no BFD IPv4 packets
can be transmitted or received on that interface.
/if:interfaces/if:interface/ip:ipv6/ip:enabled
If this configuration is set to "false", no BFD IPv6 packets
can be transmitted or received on that interface.
/if:interfaces/if:interface/ip:ipv6/ip:forwarding
If this configuration is set to "false", no BFD IPv6 packets
can be transmitted or received on that interface.
2.11.3. Module ietf-mpls
The following boolean configuration is defined in A YANG Data Model
for MPLS Base [I-D.ietf-mpls-base-yang]:
/rt:routing/mpls:mpls/mpls:interface/mpls:config/mpls:enabled
If this configuration is set to "false", no BFD MPLS packets
can be transmitted or received on that interface.
Rahman, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 20]
Internet-Draft BFD YANG October 2017
2.11.4. Module ietf-te
The following configuration is defined in the "ietf-te" YANG module
YANG Data Model for TE Topology [I-D.ietf-teas-yang-te]:
/ietf-te:te/ietf-te:tunnels/ietf-te:tunnel/ietf-te:config/ietf-
te:admin-status
If this configuration is not set to "state-up", no BFD MPLS
packets can be transmitted or received on that tunnel.
2.12. IANA BFD YANG Module
<CODE BEGINS> file "iana-bfd-types@2017-10-30.yang"
module iana-bfd-types {
namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:iana-bfd-types";
prefix "iana-bfd-types";
organization "IANA";
contact
" Internet Assigned Numbers Authority
Postal: ICANN
4676 Admiralty Way, Suite 330
Marina del Rey, CA 90292
Tel: +1 310 823 9358
<mailto:iana@iana.org>";
description
"This module contains a collection of YANG data types
considered defined by IANA and used for BFD.
Copyright (c) 2017 IETF Trust and the persons
identified as authors of the code. All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or
without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject
to the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD License
set forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions
Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).
This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX; see
the RFC itself for full legal notices.";
Rahman, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 21]
Internet-Draft BFD YANG October 2017
revision 2017-10-30 {
description "Initial revision.";
reference "RFC XXXX: IANA BFD YANG Data Types.";
}
// RFC Ed.: replace XXXX with actual RFC number and remove this
// note
typedef diagnostic {
type enumeration {
enum none {
value 0;
description "None";
}
enum control-expiry {
value 1;
description "Control timer expiry";
}
enum echo-failed {
value 2;
description "Echo failure";
}
enum neighbor-down {
value 3;
description "Neighbor down";
}
enum forwarding-reset {
value 4;
description "Forwarding reset";
}
enum path-down {
value 5;
description "Path down";
}
enum concatenated-path-down {
value 6;
description "Concatenated path down";
}
enum admin-down {
value 7;
description "Admin down";
}
enum reverse-concatenated-path-down {
value 8;
description "Reverse concatenated path down";
}
enum mis-connectivity-defect {
Rahman, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 22]
Internet-Draft BFD YANG October 2017
value 9;
description "Mis-connectivity defect as specified in RFC6428";
}
}
description
"BFD diagnostic as defined in RFC5880. Range is 0 to 31.";
}
typedef auth-type {
type enumeration {
enum reserved {
value 0;
description "Reserved";
}
enum simple-password {
value 1;
description "Simple password";
}
enum keyed-md5 {
value 2;
description "Keyed MD5";
}
enum meticulous-keyed-md5 {
value 3;
description "Meticulous keyed MD5";
}
enum keyed-sha1 {
value 4;
description "Keyed SHA1";
}
enum meticulous-keyed-sha1 {
value 5;
description "Meticulous keyed SHA1";
}
}
description
"BFD authentication type as defined in RFC5880. Range is 0 to
255.";
}
}
<CODE ENDS>
2.13. BFD types YANG Module
<CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-bfd-types@2017-10-30.yang"
module ietf-bfd-types {
Rahman, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 23]
Internet-Draft BFD YANG October 2017
namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-bfd-types";
prefix "bfd-types";
import iana-bfd-types {
prefix "iana-bfd-types";
}
import ietf-inet-types {
prefix "inet";
}
import ietf-yang-types {
prefix "yang";
}
import ietf-routing {
prefix "rt";
}
import ietf-key-chain {
prefix "kc";
}
organization "IETF BFD Working Group";
contact
"WG Web: <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/bfd>
WG List: <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
Editors: Reshad Rahman (rrahman@cisco.com),
Lianshu Zheng (vero.zheng@huawei.com),
Mahesh Jethanandani (mjethanandani@gmail.com)";
description
"This module contains a collection of BFD specific YANG data type
definitions, as per RFC5880.
Copyright (c) 2017 IETF Trust and the persons
identified as authors of the code. All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or
without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject
to the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD License
set forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions
Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).
Rahman, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 24]
Internet-Draft BFD YANG October 2017
This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX; see
the RFC itself for full legal notices.";
revision 2017-10-30 {
description "Initial revision.";
reference "RFC XXXX: A YANG data model for BFD";
}
// RFC Ed.: replace XXXX with actual RFC number and remove this
// note
identity bfdv1 {
base "rt:control-plane-protocol";
description "BFD protocol version 1 as per RFC5880.";
}
typedef discriminator {
type uint32 {
range 1..4294967295;
}
description "BFD discriminator";
}
typedef state {
type enumeration {
enum adminDown {
value 0;
description "admindown";
}
enum down {
value 1;
description "down";
}
enum init {
value 2;
description "init";
}
enum up {
value 3;
description "up";
}
}
description "BFD state as defined in RFC5880";
}
typedef multiplier {
type uint8 {
range 1..255;
Rahman, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 25]
Internet-Draft BFD YANG October 2017
}
description "Multiplier";
}
typedef hops {
type uint8 {
range 1..255;
}
description
"This corresponds to Time To Live for IPv4 and corresponds to hop
limit for IPv6";
}
/*
* Identity definitions
*/
identity path-type {
description
"Base identity for BFD path type. The session type indicates
the type of path on which BFD is running";
}
identity path-ip-sh {
base path-type;
description "BFD on IP single hop";
}
identity path-ip-mh {
base path-type;
description "BFD on IP multi hop";
}
identity path-mpls-te {
base path-type;
description "BFD on MPLS Traffic Engineering";
}
identity path-mpls-lsp {
base path-type;
description "BFD on MPLS Label Switched Path";
}
identity path-lag {
base path-type;
description "Micro-BFD on LAG member links";
}
identity encap-type {
description
"Base identity for BFD encapsulation type.";
}
identity encap-ip {
base encap-type;
Rahman, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 26]
Internet-Draft BFD YANG October 2017
description "BFD with IP encapsulation.";
}
identity auth-replay-protection {
description
"Base identity for BFD authentication replay protection. " +
"See section 6.7 of RFC5880.";
}
identity auth-replay-protection-non-meticulous {
base auth-replay-protection;
description "Non-meticulous (see section 6.7.3 of RFC5880)";
}
identity auth-replay-protection-meticulous {
base auth-replay-protection;
description "Meticulous (see section 6.7.3 of RFC5880)";
}
/*
* Feature definitions.
*/
feature authentication {
description "BFD authentication supported";
}
feature demand-mode {
description "BFD demand mode supported";
}
feature echo-mode {
description "BFD echo mode supported";
}
/*
* Groupings
*/
grouping auth-parms {
description
"Grouping for BFD authentication parameters
(see section 6.7 of RFC5880).";
container authentication-parms {
if-feature authentication;
presence
"Enables BFD authentication (see section 6.7 of RFC5880).";
description "Parameters for BFD authentication";
leaf key-chain {
type kc:key-chain-ref;
description "Name of key-chain";
Rahman, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 27]
Internet-Draft BFD YANG October 2017
}
leaf replay-protection {
type identityref {
base auth-replay-protection;
}
description
"Protection against replays";
}
}
}
grouping base-cfg-parms {
description "BFD grouping for base config parameters";
leaf local-multiplier {
type multiplier;
default 3;
description "Multiplier transmitted by local system";
}
choice interval-config-type {
description
"Two interval values or 1 value used for both tx and rx";
case tx-rx-intervals {
leaf desired-min-tx-interval {
type uint32;
units microseconds;
mandatory true;
description
"Desired minimum transmit interval of control packets";
}
leaf required-min-rx-interval {
type uint32;
units microseconds;
mandatory true;
description
"Required minimum receive interval of control packets";
}
}
case single-interval {
leaf min-interval {
type uint32;
units microseconds;
mandatory true;
description
"Desired minimum transmit interval and required " +
"minimum receive interval of control packets";
Rahman, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 28]
Internet-Draft BFD YANG October 2017
}
}
}
}
grouping client-cfg-parms {
description
"BFD grouping for config parameters
used by clients of BFD, e.g. IGP or MPLS";
leaf enable {
type boolean;
default false;
description
"Indicates whether the BFD is enabled.";
}
uses base-cfg-parms;
}
grouping common-cfg-parms {
description
"BFD grouping for common config parameters";
uses base-cfg-parms;
leaf demand-enabled {
if-feature demand-mode;
type boolean;
default false;
description
"To enable demand mode";
}
leaf admin-down {
type boolean;
default false;
description
"Is the BFD session administratively down";
}
uses auth-parms;
}
grouping all-session {
description "BFD session operational information";
leaf path-type {
type identityref {
base path-type;
}
Rahman, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 29]
Internet-Draft BFD YANG October 2017
config "false";
description
"BFD session type, this indicates the path type that BFD is
running on";
}
leaf ip-encapsulation {
type boolean;
config "false";
description "Whether BFD encapsulation uses IP";
}
leaf local-discriminator {
type discriminator;
config "false";
description "Local discriminator";
}
leaf remote-discriminator {
type discriminator;
config "false";
description "Remote discriminator";
}
leaf remote-multiplier {
type multiplier;
config "false";
description "Remote multiplier";
}
leaf demand-capability {
if-feature demand-mode;
type boolean;
config "false";
description "Local demand mode capability";
}
leaf source-port {
when "../ip-encapsulation = 'true'" {
description
"Source port valid only when IP encapsulation is used";
}
type inet:port-number;
config "false";
description "Source UDP port";
}
leaf dest-port {
when "../ip-encapsulation = 'true'" {
description
"Destination port valid only when IP encapsulation is used";
}
type inet:port-number;
config "false";
description "Destination UDP port";
Rahman, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 30]
Internet-Draft BFD YANG October 2017
}
container session-running {
config "false";
description "BFD session running information";
leaf session-index {
type uint32;
description
"An index used to uniquely identify BFD sessions";
}
leaf local-state {
type state;
description "Local state";
}
leaf remote-state {
type state;
description "Remote state";
}
leaf local-diagnostic {
type iana-bfd-types:diagnostic;
description "Local diagnostic";
}
leaf remote-diagnostic {
type iana-bfd-types:diagnostic;
description "Remote diagnostic";
}
leaf remote-authenticated {
type boolean;
description
"Indicates whether incoming BFD control packets are
authenticated";
}
leaf remote-authentication-type {
when "../remote-authenticated = 'true'" {
description
"Only valid when incoming BFD control packets are
authenticated";
}
if-feature authentication;
type iana-bfd-types:auth-type;
description
"Authentication type of incoming BFD control packets";
}
leaf detection-mode {
type enumeration {
enum async-with-echo {
value "1";
description "Async with echo";
Rahman, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 31]
Internet-Draft BFD YANG October 2017
}
enum async-without-echo {
value "2";
description "Async without echo";
}
enum demand-with-echo {
value "3";
description "Demand with echo";
}
enum demand-without-echo {
value "4";
description "Demand without echo";
}
}
description "Detection mode";
}
leaf negotiated-tx-interval {
type uint32;
units microseconds;
description "Negotiated transmit interval";
}
leaf negotiated-rx-interval {
type uint32;
units microseconds;
description "Negotiated receive interval";
}
leaf detection-time {
type uint32;
units microseconds;
description "Detection time";
}
leaf echo-tx-interval-in-use {
when "../../path-type = 'bfd-types:path-ip-sh'" {
description
"Echo is supported for IP single-hop only.";
}
if-feature echo-mode;
type uint32;
units microseconds;
description "Echo transmit interval in use";
}
}
container sesssion-statistics {
config "false";
description "BFD per-session statistics";
leaf create-time {
Rahman, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 32]
Internet-Draft BFD YANG October 2017
type yang:date-and-time;
description
"Time and date when session was created";
}
leaf last-down-time {
type yang:date-and-time;
description
"Time and date of last time the session went down";
}
leaf last-up-time {
type yang:date-and-time;
description
"Time and date of last time the session went up";
}
leaf down-count {
type uint32;
description "Session Down Count";
}
leaf admin-down-count {
type uint32;
description "Session Admin-Down Count";
}
leaf receive-packet-count {
type uint64;
description "Received Packet Count";
}
leaf send-packet-count {
type uint64;
description "Sent Packet Count";
}
leaf receive-bad-packet {
type uint64;
description "Received bad packet count";
}
leaf send-failed-packet {
type uint64;
description "Packet Failed to Send Count";
}
}
}
grouping session-statistics {
description "Grouping for session counters";
container session-statistics {
config false;
description "BFD session counters";
leaf session-count {
type uint32;
Rahman, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 33]
Internet-Draft BFD YANG October 2017
description "Number of sessions";
}
leaf session-up-count {
type uint32;
description "Count of sessions which are up";
}
leaf session-down-count {
type uint32;
description "Count of sessions which are down";
}
leaf session-admin-down-count {
type uint32;
description "Count of sessions which are admin-down";
}
}
}
grouping notification-parms {
description
"This group describes common parameters that will be sent " +
"as part of BFD notification";
leaf local-discr {
type discriminator;
description "BFD local discriminator";
}
leaf remote-discr {
type discriminator;
description "BFD remote discriminator";
}
leaf new-state {
type state;
description "Current BFD state";
}
leaf state-change-reason {
type iana-bfd-types:diagnostic;
description "BFD state change reason";
}
leaf time-of-last-state-change {
type yang:date-and-time;
description
"Calendar time of previous state change";
}
Rahman, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 34]
Internet-Draft BFD YANG October 2017
leaf dest-addr {
type inet:ip-address;
description "BFD peer address";
}
leaf source-addr {
type inet:ip-address;
description "BFD local address";
}
leaf session-index {
type uint32;
description "An index used to uniquely identify BFD sessions";
}
leaf path-type {
type identityref {
base path-type;
}
description "BFD path type";
}
}
}
<CODE ENDS>
2.14. BFD top-level YANG Module
<CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-bfd@2017-10-30.yang"
module ietf-bfd {
namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-bfd";
prefix "bfd";
import ietf-bfd-types {
prefix "bfd-types";
}
import ietf-routing {
prefix "rt";
}
organization "IETF BFD Working Group";
contact
"WG Web: <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/bfd>
WG List: <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
Rahman, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 35]
Internet-Draft BFD YANG October 2017
Editors: Reshad Rahman (rrahman@cisco.com),
Lianshu Zheng (vero.zheng@huawei.com),
Mahesh Jethanandani (mjethanandani@gmail.com)";
description
"This module contains the YANG definition for BFD parameters as
per RFC5880.
Copyright (c) 2017 IETF Trust and the persons
identified as authors of the code. All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or
without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject
to the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD License
set forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions
Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).
This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX; see
the RFC itself for full legal notices.";
revision 2017-10-30 {
description "Initial revision.";
reference "RFC XXXX: A YANG data model for BFD";
}
// RFC Ed.: replace XXXX with actual RFC number and remove this
// note
augment "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/"
+ "rt:control-plane-protocol" {
when "rt:type = 'bfd-types:bfdv1'" {
description
"This augmentation is only valid for a control-plane protocol
instance of BFD (type 'bfdv1').";
}
description "BFD augmentation.";
container bfd {
description "BFD top level container";
uses bfd-types:session-statistics;
}
}
}
<CODE ENDS>
Rahman, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 36]
Internet-Draft BFD YANG October 2017
2.15. BFD IP single-hop YANG Module
<CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-bfd-ip-sh@2017-10-30.yang"
module ietf-bfd-ip-sh {
namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-bfd-ip-sh";
prefix "bfd-ip-sh";
import ietf-bfd-types {
prefix "bfd-types";
}
import ietf-bfd {
prefix "bfd";
}
import ietf-interfaces {
prefix "if";
}
import ietf-inet-types {
prefix "inet";
}
import ietf-routing {
prefix "rt";
}
organization "IETF BFD Working Group";
contact
"WG Web: <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/bfd>
WG List: <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
Editors: Reshad Rahman (rrahman@cisco.com),
Lianshu Zheng (vero.zheng@huawei.com),
Mahesh Jethanandani (mjethanandani@gmail.com)";
description
"This module contains the YANG definition for BFD IP single-hop
as per RFC5881.
Copyright (c) 2017 IETF Trust and the persons
identified as authors of the code. All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or
without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject
Rahman, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 37]
Internet-Draft BFD YANG October 2017
to the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD License
set forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions
Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).
This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX; see
the RFC itself for full legal notices.";
revision 2017-10-30 {
description "Initial revision.";
reference "RFC XXXX: A YANG data model for BFD IP single-hop";
}
// RFC Ed.: replace XXXX with actual RFC number and remove this
// note
augment "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/"
+ "rt:control-plane-protocol/bfd:bfd" {
description "BFD augmentation for IP single-hop";
container ip-sh {
description "BFD IP single-hop top level container";
uses bfd-types:session-statistics;
list sessions {
key "interface dest-addr";
description "List of IP single-hop sessions";
leaf interface {
type if:interface-ref;
description
"Interface on which the BFD session is running.";
}
leaf dest-addr {
type inet:ip-address;
description "IP address of the peer";
}
leaf source-addr {
type inet:ip-address;
description "Local address";
}
uses bfd-types:common-cfg-parms;
uses bfd-types:all-session;
}
}
}
Rahman, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 38]
Internet-Draft BFD YANG October 2017
notification singlehop-notification {
description
"Notification for BFD single-hop session state change. An " +
"implementation may rate-limit notifications, e.g. when a" +
"session is continuously changing state.";
uses bfd-types:notification-parms;
leaf interface {
type if:interface-ref;
description "Interface to which this BFD session belongs to";
}
leaf echo-enabled {
type boolean;
description "Was echo enabled for BFD";
}
}
}
<CODE ENDS>
2.16. BFD IP multi-hop YANG Module
<CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-bfd-ip-mh@2017-10-30.yang"
module ietf-bfd-ip-mh {
namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-bfd-ip-mh";
// replace with IANA namespace when assigned
prefix "bfd-ip-mh";
import ietf-bfd-types {
prefix "bfd-types";
}
import ietf-bfd {
prefix "bfd";
}
import ietf-inet-types {
prefix "inet";
}
import ietf-routing {
prefix "rt";
}
Rahman, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 39]
Internet-Draft BFD YANG October 2017
organization "IETF BFD Working Group";
contact
"WG Web: <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/bfd>
WG List: <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
Editors: Reshad Rahman (rrahman@cisco.com),
Lianshu Zheng (vero.zheng@huawei.com),
Mahesh Jethanandani (mjethanandani@gmail.com)";
description
"This module contains the YANG definition for BFD IP multi-hop
as per RFC5883.
Copyright (c) 2017 IETF Trust and the persons
identified as authors of the code. All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or
without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject
to the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD License
set forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions
Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).
This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX; see
the RFC itself for full legal notices.";
revision 2017-10-30 {
description "Initial revision.";
reference "RFC XXXX: A YANG data model for BFD IP multi-hop";
}
// RFC Ed.: replace XXXX with actual RFC number and remove this
// note
augment "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/"
+ "rt:control-plane-protocol/bfd:bfd" {
description "BFD augmentation for IP multi-hop";
container ip-mh {
description "BFD IP multi-hop top level container";
uses bfd-types:session-statistics;
list session-group {
key "source-addr dest-addr";
description
"Group of BFD IP multi-hop sessions (for ECMP). A " +
"group of sessions is between 1 source and 1 " +
Rahman, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 40]
Internet-Draft BFD YANG October 2017
"destination, each session has a different field " +
"in UDP/IP hdr for ECMP.";
leaf source-addr {
type inet:ip-address;
description
"Local IP address";
}
leaf dest-addr {
type inet:ip-address;
description
"IP address of the peer";
}
uses bfd-types:common-cfg-parms;
leaf tx-ttl {
type bfd-types:hops;
default 255;
description "Hop count of outgoing BFD control packets";
}
leaf rx-ttl {
type bfd-types:hops;
mandatory true;
description
"Minimum allowed hop count value for incoming BFD control
packets. Control packets whose hop count is lower than this
value are dropped.";
}
list sessions {
config false;
description
"The multiple BFD sessions between a source and a " +
"destination.";
uses bfd-types:all-session;
}
}
}
}
notification multihop-notification {
description
"Notification for BFD multi-hop session state change. An " +
"implementation may rate-limit notifications, e.g. when a" +
"session is continuously changing state.";
uses bfd-types:notification-parms;
}
}
Rahman, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 41]
Internet-Draft BFD YANG October 2017
<CODE ENDS>
2.17. BFD over LAG YANG Module
<CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-bfd-lag@2017-10-30.yang"
module ietf-bfd-lag {
namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-bfd-lag";
// replace with IANA namespace when assigned
prefix "bfd-lag";
import ietf-bfd-types {
prefix "bfd-types";
}
import ietf-bfd {
prefix "bfd";
}
import ietf-interfaces {
prefix "if";
}
import ietf-inet-types {
prefix "inet";
}
import ietf-routing {
prefix "rt";
}
organization "IETF BFD Working Group";
contact
"WG Web: <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/bfd>
WG List: <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
Editors: Reshad Rahman (rrahman@cisco.com),
Lianshu Zheng vero.zheng@huawei.com),
Mahesh Jethanandani (mjethanandani@gmail.com)";
description
"This module contains the YANG definition for BFD over LAG
interfaces as per RFC7130.
Copyright (c) 2017 IETF Trust and the persons
identified as authors of the code. All rights reserved.
Rahman, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 42]
Internet-Draft BFD YANG October 2017
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or
without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject
to the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD License
set forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions
Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).
This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX; see
the RFC itself for full legal notices.";
revision 2017-10-30 {
description "Initial revision.";
reference "RFC XXXX: A YANG data model for BFD over LAG";
}
// RFC Ed.: replace XXXX with actual RFC number and remove this
// note
augment "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/"
+ "rt:control-plane-protocol/bfd:bfd" {
description "BFD augmentation for LAG";
container lag {
description "BFD over LAG top level container";
container micro-bfd-ipv4-session-statistics {
description "Micro-BFD IPv4 session counters";
uses bfd-types:session-statistics;
}
container micro-bfd-ipv6-session-statistics {
description "Micro-BFD IPv6 session counters";
uses bfd-types:session-statistics;
}
list sessions {
key "lag-name";
description "A LAG interface on which BFD is running";
leaf lag-name {
type if:interface-ref ;
description "Name of the LAG";
}
leaf ipv4-dest-addr {
type inet:ipv4-address;
description
"IPv4 address of the peer, for IPv4 micro-BFD.";
}
leaf ipv6-dest-addr {
type inet:ipv6-address;
description
Rahman, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 43]
Internet-Draft BFD YANG October 2017
"IPv6 address of the peer, for IPv6 micro-BFD.";
}
uses bfd-types:common-cfg-parms;
leaf use-ipv4 {
type boolean;
description "Using IPv4 micro-BFD.";
}
leaf use-ipv6 {
type boolean;
description "Using IPv6 micro-BFD.";
}
list member-links {
key "member-link";
config false;
description
"Micro-BFD over LAG. This represents one member link";
leaf member-link {
type if:interface-ref;
description
"Member link on which micro-BFD is running";
}
container micro-bfd-ipv4 {
when "../../use-ipv4 = 'true'" {
description "Needed only if IPv4 is used.";
}
description
"Micro-BFD IPv4 session state on member link";
uses bfd-types:all-session;
}
container micro-bfd-ipv6 {
when "../../use-ipv6 = 'true'" {
description "Needed only if IPv6 is used.";
}
description
"Micro-BFD IPv6 session state on member link";
uses bfd-types:all-session;
}
}
}
}
}
notification lag-notification {
description
"Notification for BFD over LAG session state change. " +
Rahman, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 44]
Internet-Draft BFD YANG October 2017
"An implementation may rate-limit notifications, e.g. when a" +
"session is continuously changing state.";
uses bfd-types:notification-parms;
leaf lag-name {
type if:interface-ref;
description "LAG interface name";
}
leaf member-link {
type if:interface-ref;
description "Member link on which BFD is running";
}
}
}
<CODE ENDS>
2.18. BFD over MPLS YANG Module
<CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-bfd-mpls@2017-10-30.yang"
module ietf-bfd-mpls {
namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-bfd-mpls";
// replace with IANA namespace when assigned
prefix "bfd-mpls";
import ietf-bfd-types {
prefix "bfd-types";
}
import ietf-bfd {
prefix "bfd";
}
import ietf-inet-types {
prefix "inet";
}
import ietf-routing {
prefix "rt";
}
organization "IETF BFD Working Group";
contact
"WG Web: <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/bfd>
Rahman, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 45]
Internet-Draft BFD YANG October 2017
WG List: <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
Editors: Reshad Rahman (rrahman@cisco.com),
Lianshu Zheng (vero.zheng@huawei.com),
Mahesh Jethanandani (mjethanandani@gmail.com)";
description
"This module contains the YANG definition for BFD parameters for
MPLS LSPs as per RFC5884.
Copyright (c) 2017 IETF Trust and the persons
identified as authors of the code. All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or
without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject
to the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD License
set forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions
Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).
This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX; see
the RFC itself for full legal notices.";
revision 2017-10-30 {
description "Initial revision.";
reference "RFC XXXX: A YANG data model for BFD over MPLS LSPs";
}
// RFC Ed.: replace XXXX with actual RFC number and remove this
// note
identity encap-gach {
base bfd-types:encap-type;
description
"BFD with G-ACh encapsulation as per RFC5586.";
}
identity encap-ip-gach {
base bfd-types:encap-type;
description
"BFD with IP and G-ACh encapsulation as per RFC5586.";
}
grouping encap-cfg {
description "Configuration for BFD encapsulation";
leaf encap {
type identityref {
Rahman, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 46]
Internet-Draft BFD YANG October 2017
base bfd-types:encap-type;
}
default bfd-types:encap-ip;
description "BFD encapsulation";
}
}
grouping mpls-dest-address {
description "Destination address as per RFC5884";
leaf mpls-dest-address {
type inet:ip-address;
config "false";
description
"Destination address as per RFC5884.
Needed if IP encapsulation is used";
}
}
augment "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/"
+ "rt:control-plane-protocol/bfd:bfd" {
description "BFD augmentation for MPLS";
container mpls {
description "BFD MPLS top level container";
uses bfd-types:session-statistics;
container egress {
description "Egress configuration";
uses bfd-types:client-cfg-parms;
uses bfd-types:auth-parms;
}
list session-group {
key "mpls-fec";
description
"Group of BFD MPLS sessions (for ECMP). A group of " +
"sessions is for 1 FEC, each session has a different " +
"field in UDP/IP hdr for ECMP.";
leaf mpls-fec {
type inet:ip-prefix;
description "MPLS FEC";
}
uses bfd-types:common-cfg-parms;
Rahman, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 47]
Internet-Draft BFD YANG October 2017
list sessions {
config false;
description
"The BFD sessions for an MPLS FEC. Local " +
"discriminator is unique for each session in the " +
"group.";
uses bfd-types:all-session;
uses bfd-mpls:mpls-dest-address;
}
}
}
}
notification mpls-notification {
description
"Notification for BFD over MPLS FEC session state change. " +
"An implementation may rate-limit notifications, e.g. when a" +
"session is continuously changing state.";
uses bfd-types:notification-parms;
leaf mpls-dest-address {
type inet:ip-address;
description
"Destination address as per RFC5884.
Needed if IP encapsulation is used";
}
}
}
<CODE ENDS>
2.19. BFD over MPLS-TE YANG Module
<CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-bfd-mpls-te@2017-10-30.yang"
module ietf-bfd-mpls-te {
namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-bfd-mpls-te";
// replace with IANA namespace when assigned
prefix "bfd-mpls-te";
import ietf-bfd-types {
prefix "bfd-types";
}
import ietf-bfd {
prefix "bfd";
Rahman, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 48]
Internet-Draft BFD YANG October 2017
}
import ietf-bfd-mpls {
prefix "bfd-mpls";
}
import ietf-te {
prefix "te";
}
import ietf-routing {
prefix "rt";
}
organization "IETF BFD Working Group";
contact
"WG Web: <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/bfd>
WG List: <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
Editors: Reshad Rahman (rrahman@cisco.com),
Lianshu Zheng (vero.zheng@huawei.com),
Mahesh Jethanandani (mjethanandani@gmail.com)";
description
"This module contains the YANG definition for BFD parameters for
MPLS Traffic Engineering as per RFC5884.
Copyright (c) 2017 IETF Trust and the persons
identified as authors of the code. All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or
without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject
to the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD License
set forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions
Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).
This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX; see
the RFC itself for full legal notices.";
revision 2017-10-30 {
description "Initial revision.";
reference "RFC XXXX: A YANG data model for BFD over MPLS-TE";
}
// RFC Ed.: replace XXXX with actual RFC number and remove this
// note
Rahman, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 49]
Internet-Draft BFD YANG October 2017
augment "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/"
+ "rt:control-plane-protocol/bfd:bfd" {
description "BFD augmentation for MPLS-TE";
container mpls-te {
description "BFD MPLS-TE top level container";
container egress {
description "Egress configuration";
uses bfd-types:client-cfg-parms;
uses bfd-types:auth-parms;
}
uses bfd-types:session-statistics;
}
}
augment "/te:te/te:tunnels/te:tunnel" {
description "BFD configuration on MPLS-TE tunnel.";
uses bfd-types:common-cfg-parms;
uses bfd-mpls:encap-cfg;
}
augment "/te:te/te:lsps-state/te:lsp" {
when "/te:te/te:lsps-state/te:lsp/te:origin-type != 'transit'" {
description "BFD information not needed at transit points";
}
description "BFD state information on MPLS-TE LSP.";
uses bfd-types:all-session;
uses bfd-mpls:mpls-dest-address;
}
notification mpls-te-notification {
description
"Notification for BFD over MPLS-TE session state change. " +
"An implementation may rate-limit notifications, e.g. when a" +
"session is continuously changing state.";
uses bfd-types:notification-parms;
uses bfd-mpls:mpls-dest-address;
Rahman, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 50]
Internet-Draft BFD YANG October 2017
leaf tunnel-name {
type string;
description "MPLS-TE tunnel on which BFD was running.";
}
}
}
<CODE ENDS>
2.20. Security Considerations
The YANG module defined in this memo is designed to be accessed via
the NETCONF protocol [RFC6241]. The lowest NETCONF layer is the
secure transport layer and the mandatory to implement secure
transport is SSH [RFC6242]. The NETCONF access control model
[RFC6536] provides the means to restrict access for particular
NETCONF users to a pre-configured subset of all available NETCONF
protocol operations and content.
The YANG module has writeable data nodes which can be used for
creation of BFD sessions and modification of BFD session parameters.
The system should "police" creation of BFD sessions to prevent new
sessions from causing existing BFD sessions to fail. For BFD session
modification, the BFD protocol has mechanisms in place which allow
for in service modification.
2.21. IANA Considerations
The IANA is requested to as assign a new namespace URI from the IETF
XML registry.
This document registers the following namesace URIs in the IETF XML
registry [RFC3688]:
--------------------------------------------------------------------
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-bfd
Registrant Contact: The IESG.
XML: N/A, the requested URI is an XML namespace.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-bfd-ip-sh
Rahman, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 51]
Internet-Draft BFD YANG October 2017
Registrant Contact: The IESG.
XML: N/A, the requested URI is an XML namespace.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-bfd-mh
Registrant Contact: The IESG.
XML: N/A, the requested URI is an XML namespace.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-bfd-lag
Registrant Contact: The IESG.
XML: N/A, the requested URI is an XML namespace.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-bfd-mpls
Registrant Contact: The IESG.
XML: N/A, the requested URI is an XML namespace.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-bfd-mpls-te
Registrant Contact: The IESG.
XML: N/A, the requested URI is an XML namespace.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Rahman, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 52]
Internet-Draft BFD YANG October 2017
2.21.1. IANA-Maintained iana-bfd-types module
This document defines the initial version of the IANA-maintained
iana-bfd-types YANG module.
The iana-bfd-types YANG module is intended to reflect the "BFD
Diagnostic Codes" registry and "BFD Authentication Types" registry at
https://www.iana.org/assignments/bfd-parameters/bfd-parameters.xhtml
2.22. Acknowledgements
We would also like to thank Nobo Akiya and Jeff Haas for their
encouragement on this work. We would also like to thank Rakesh
Gandhi and Tarek Saad for their help on the MPLS-TE model. We would
also like to thank Acee Lindem for his guidance.
3. References
3.1. Normative References
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, <https://www.rfc-
editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
[RFC3688] Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688,
DOI 10.17487/RFC3688, January 2004, <https://www.rfc-
editor.org/info/rfc3688>.
[RFC5586] Bocci, M., Ed., Vigoureux, M., Ed., and S. Bryant, Ed.,
"MPLS Generic Associated Channel", RFC 5586,
DOI 10.17487/RFC5586, June 2009, <https://www.rfc-
editor.org/info/rfc5586>.
[RFC5880] Katz, D. and D. Ward, "Bidirectional Forwarding Detection
(BFD)", RFC 5880, DOI 10.17487/RFC5880, June 2010,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5880>.
[RFC5881] Katz, D. and D. Ward, "Bidirectional Forwarding Detection
(BFD) for IPv4 and IPv6 (Single Hop)", RFC 5881,
DOI 10.17487/RFC5881, June 2010, <https://www.rfc-
editor.org/info/rfc5881>.
[RFC5882] Katz, D. and D. Ward, "Generic Application of
Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD)", RFC 5882,
DOI 10.17487/RFC5882, June 2010, <https://www.rfc-
editor.org/info/rfc5882>.
Rahman, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 53]
Internet-Draft BFD YANG October 2017
[RFC5883] Katz, D. and D. Ward, "Bidirectional Forwarding Detection
(BFD) for Multihop Paths", RFC 5883, DOI 10.17487/RFC5883,
June 2010, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5883>.
[RFC5884] Aggarwal, R., Kompella, K., Nadeau, T., and G. Swallow,
"Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) for MPLS Label
Switched Paths (LSPs)", RFC 5884, DOI 10.17487/RFC5884,
June 2010, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5884>.
[RFC5885] Nadeau, T., Ed. and C. Pignataro, Ed., "Bidirectional
Forwarding Detection (BFD) for the Pseudowire Virtual
Circuit Connectivity Verification (VCCV)", RFC 5885,
DOI 10.17487/RFC5885, June 2010, <https://www.rfc-
editor.org/info/rfc5885>.
[RFC7130] Bhatia, M., Ed., Chen, M., Ed., Boutros, S., Ed.,
Binderberger, M., Ed., and J. Haas, Ed., "Bidirectional
Forwarding Detection (BFD) on Link Aggregation Group (LAG)
Interfaces", RFC 7130, DOI 10.17487/RFC7130, February
2014, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7130>.
[RFC7223] Bjorklund, M., "A YANG Data Model for Interface
Management", RFC 7223, DOI 10.17487/RFC7223, May 2014,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7223>.
[RFC7277] Bjorklund, M., "A YANG Data Model for IP Management",
RFC 7277, DOI 10.17487/RFC7277, June 2014,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7277>.
[RFC8022] Lhotka, L. and A. Lindem, "A YANG Data Model for Routing
Management", RFC 8022, DOI 10.17487/RFC8022, November
2016, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8022>.
3.2. Informative References
[I-D.dsdt-nmda-guidelines]
Bjorklund, M., Schoenwaelder, J., Shafer, P., Watsen, K.,
and R. Wilton, "Guidelines for YANG Module Authors
(NMDA)", draft-dsdt-nmda-guidelines-01 (work in progress),
May 2017.
[I-D.ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam]
Kumar, D., Wang, Z., Wu, Q., Rahman, R., and S. Raghavan,
"Generic YANG Data Model for Operations, Administration,
and Maintenance(OAM) protocols for Connectionless
networks", draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-13
(work in progress), October 2017.
Rahman, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 54]
Internet-Draft BFD YANG October 2017
[I-D.ietf-mpls-base-yang]
Raza, K., Gandhi, R., Liu, X., Beeram, V., Saad, T.,
Bryskin, I., Chen, X., Jones, R., and B. Wen, "A YANG Data
Model for MPLS Base", draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang-05 (work
in progress), July 2017.
[I-D.ietf-netmod-schema-mount]
Bjorklund, M. and L. Lhotka, "YANG Schema Mount", draft-
ietf-netmod-schema-mount-08 (work in progress), October
2017.
[I-D.ietf-rtgwg-device-model]
Lindem, A., Berger, L., Bogdanovic, D., and C. Hopps,
"Network Device YANG Logical Organization", draft-ietf-
rtgwg-device-model-02 (work in progress), March 2017.
[I-D.ietf-rtgwg-lne-model]
Berger, L., Hopps, C., Lindem, A., Bogdanovic, D., and X.
Liu, "YANG Logical Network Elements", draft-ietf-rtgwg-
lne-model-04 (work in progress), September 2017.
[I-D.ietf-rtgwg-ni-model]
Berger, L., Hopps, C., Lindem, A., Bogdanovic, D., and X.
Liu, "YANG Network Instances", draft-ietf-rtgwg-ni-
model-04 (work in progress), September 2017.
[I-D.ietf-teas-yang-te]
Saad, T., Gandhi, R., Liu, X., Beeram, V., Shah, H., and
I. Bryskin, "A YANG Data Model for Traffic Engineering
Tunnels and Interfaces", draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-08 (work
in progress), July 2017.
[RFC8177] Lindem, A., Ed., Qu, Y., Yeung, D., Chen, I., and J.
Zhang, "YANG Data Model for Key Chains", RFC 8177,
DOI 10.17487/RFC8177, June 2017, <https://www.rfc-
editor.org/info/rfc8177>.
Appendix A. Echo function configuration example
The following intervals are added for the echo function (if
supported):
desired-min-echo-tx-interval
This is the minimum interval that the local system would like
to use when transmitting BFD echo packets. If 0, the echo
function as defined in BFD [RFC5880] is disabled.
required-min-echo-rx-interval
Rahman, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 55]
Internet-Draft BFD YANG October 2017
This is the Required Min Echo RX Interval as defined in BFD
[RFC5880].
module: example-bfd-echo
augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols
/rt:control-plane-protocol/bfd:bfd/bfd-ip-sh:ip-sh
/bfd-ip-sh:sessions:
+--rw echo {bfd-types:echo-mode}?
+--rw desired-min-echo-tx-interval? uint32
+--rw required-min-echo-rx-interval? uint32
A.1. Example YANG module for BFD echo function
module example-bfd-echo {
namespace "tag:example.com,2017:example-bfd-echo";
prefix "example-bfd-echo";
import ietf-bfd-types {
prefix "bfd-types";
}
import ietf-bfd {
prefix "bfd";
}
import ietf-bfd-ip-sh {
prefix "bfd-ip-sh";
}
import ietf-routing {
prefix "rt";
}
organization "IETF BFD Working Group";
contact
"WG Web: <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/bfd>
WG List: <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
Editors: Reshad Rahman (rrahman@cisco.com),
Lianshu Zheng (vero.zheng@huawei.com),
Mahesh Jethanandani (mjethanandani@gmail.com)";
description
"This module contains an example YANG augmentation for configuration
of BFD echo function.
Rahman, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 56]
Internet-Draft BFD YANG October 2017
Copyright (c) 2017 IETF Trust and the persons
identified as authors of the code. All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or
without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject
to the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD License
set forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions
Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).
This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX; see
the RFC itself for full legal notices.";
revision 2017-10-30 {
description "Initial revision.";
reference
"RFC XXXX: A YANG data model example augmentation for BFD echo
function";
}
// RFC Ed.: replace XXXX with actual RFC number and remove this
// note
/*
* Groupings
*/
grouping echo-cfg-parms {
description "BFD grouping for echo config parameters";
leaf desired-min-echo-tx-interval {
type uint32;
units microseconds;
default 0;
description "Desired minumum transmit interval for echo";
}
leaf required-min-echo-rx-interval {
type uint32;
units microseconds;
default 0;
description "Required minimum receive interval for echo";
}
}
augment "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/"
+ "rt:control-plane-protocol/bfd:bfd/bfd-ip-sh:ip-sh/"
+ "bfd-ip-sh:sessions" {
description "Augmentation for BFD echo fucntion.";
Rahman, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 57]
Internet-Draft BFD YANG October 2017
container echo {
if-feature bfd-types:echo-mode;
description "BFD echo function container";
uses echo-cfg-parms;
}
}
}
Appendix B. BFD client configuration example
The following is an example of how a BFD client could use the
grouping client-cfg-parms.
module: example-bfd-client
+--rw area* [area-id]
+--rw area-id uint32
+--rw bfd
| +--rw enable? boolean
| +--rw local-multiplier? multiplier
| +--rw (interval-config-type)?
| +--:(tx-rx-intervals)
| | +--rw desired-min-tx-interval uint32
| | +--rw required-min-rx-interval uint32
| +--:(single-interval)
| +--rw min-interval uint32
+--rw interface* [interface]
+--rw interface if:interface-ref
+--rw bfd
+--rw enable? boolean
+--rw local-multiplier? multiplier
+--rw (interval-config-type)?
+--:(tx-rx-intervals)
| +--rw desired-min-tx-interval uint32
| +--rw required-min-rx-interval uint32
+--:(single-interval)
+--rw min-interval uint32
B.1. Example YANG module for BFD client
module example-bfd-client {
namespace "tag:example.com,2017:example-bfd-client";
prefix "example-bfd-client";
import ietf-bfd-types {
Rahman, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 58]
Internet-Draft BFD YANG October 2017
prefix "bfd-types";
}
import ietf-interfaces {
prefix "if";
}
organization "IETF BFD Working Group";
contact
"WG Web: <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/bfd>
WG List: <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
Editors: Reshad Rahman (rrahman@cisco.com),
Lianshu Zheng (vero.zheng@huawei.com),
Mahesh Jethanandani (mjethanandani@gmail.com)";
description
"This module contains an example of how a protocol which is a
client of BFD would use BFD parameters.
Copyright (c) 2017 IETF Trust and the persons
identified as authors of the code. All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or
without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject
to the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD License
set forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions
Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).
This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX; see
the RFC itself for full legal notices.";
revision 2017-10-30 {
description "Initial revision.";
reference
"RFC XXXX: A YANG data model example for BFD client.";
}
// RFC Ed.: replace XXXX with actual RFC number and remove this
// note
feature routing-app-bfd {
description "BFD configuration under routing-app";
}
list area {
Rahman, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 59]
Internet-Draft BFD YANG October 2017
key "area-id";
description "Specify a routing area.";
leaf area-id {
type uint32;
description "Area";
}
container bfd {
description "BFD configuration for the area.";
uses bfd-types:client-cfg-parms {
if-feature routing-app-bfd;
}
}
list interface {
key "interface";
description "List of interfaces";
leaf interface {
type if:interface-ref;
description "Interface";
}
container bfd {
description "BFD configuration for the interface.";
uses bfd-types:client-cfg-parms {
if-feature routing-app-bfd;
}
}
}
}
}
Appendix C. Change log
RFC Editor: Remove this section upon publication as an RFC.
C.1. Changes between versions -06 and -07
o New ietf-bfd-types module.
o Grouping for BFD clients to have BFD multiplier and interval
values.
o Change in ietf-bfd-mpls-te since MPLS-TE model changed.
o Removed bfd- prefix from many names.
Rahman, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 60]
Internet-Draft BFD YANG October 2017
C.2. Changes between versions -05 and -06
o Adhere to NMDA-guidelines.
o Echo function config moved to appendix as example.
o Added IANA YANG modules.
o Addressed various comments.
C.3. Changes between versions -04 and -05
o "bfd" node in augment of control-plane-protocol as per A YANG Data
Model for Routing Management [RFC8022].
o Removed augment of network-instance. Replaced by schema-mount.
o Added information on interaction with other YANG modules.
C.4. Changes between versions -03 and -04
o Updated author information.
o Fixed YANG compile error in ietf-bfd-lag.yang which was due to
incorrect when statement.
C.5. Changes between versions -02 and -03
o Fixed YANG compilation warning due to incorrect revision date in
ietf-bfd-ip-sh module.
C.6. Changes between versions -01 and -02
o Replace routing-instance, which has been removed from A YANG Data
Model for Routing Management [RFC8022], with network-instance from
YANG Network Instances [I-D.ietf-rtgwg-ni-model]
C.7. Changes between versions -00 and -01
o Remove BFD configuration parameters from BFD clients, all BFD
configuration parameters in BFD
o YANG module split in multiple YANG modules (one per type of
forwarding path)
o For BFD over MPLS-TE we augment MPLS-TE model
Rahman, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 61]
Internet-Draft BFD YANG October 2017
o For BFD authentication we now use YANG Data Model for Key Chains
[RFC8177]
Authors' Addresses
Reshad Rahman (editor)
Cisco Systems
Canada
Email: rrahman@cisco.com
Lianshu Zheng (editor)
Huawei Technologies
China
Email: vero.zheng@huawei.com
Mahesh Jethanandani (editor)
Cisco Systems
Email: mjethanandani@gmail.com
Santosh Pallagatti
India
Email: santosh.pallagatti@gmail.com
Greg Mirsky
ZTE Corporation
Email: gregimirsky@gmail.com
Rahman, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 62]