BIER BFD
draft-ietf-bier-bfd-06
The information below is for an old version of the document.
Document | Type |
This is an older version of an Internet-Draft whose latest revision state is "Active".
|
|
---|---|---|---|
Authors | Quan Xiong , Greg Mirsky , fangwei hu , Chang Liu , Gyan Mishra | ||
Last updated | 2024-06-30 (Latest revision 2024-06-25) | ||
Replaces | draft-hu-bier-bfd | ||
RFC stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
Formats | |||
Reviews | |||
Additional resources | Mailing list discussion | ||
Stream | WG state | In WG Last Call | |
Document shepherd | Donald E. Eastlake 3rd | ||
IESG | IESG state | I-D Exists | |
Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
Telechat date | (None) | ||
Responsible AD | (None) | ||
Send notices to | d3e3e3@gmail.com |
draft-ietf-bier-bfd-06
BIER WG Q. Xiong Internet-Draft ZTE Corporation Intended status: Standards Track G. Mirsky Expires: 27 December 2024 Ericsson F. Hu Individual C. Liu China Unicom G. Mishra Verizon Inc. 25 June 2024 BIER BFD draft-ietf-bier-bfd-06 Abstract Point to multipoint (P2MP) BFD is designed to verify multipoint connectivity. This document specifies the application of P2MP BFD in BIER network. Status of This Memo This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." This Internet-Draft will expire on 27 December 2024. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2024 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/ license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights Xiong, et al. Expires 27 December 2024 [Page 1] Internet-Draft BIER BFD June 2024 and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License. Table of Contents 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2. Conventions used in this document . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2.1. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2.2. Requirements Language . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 3. BIER BFD Encapsulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 4. BIER BFD Session Bootstrapping . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 4.1. BIER OAM Bootstrapping . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 4.2. IGP Bootstrapping . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 4.2.1. IS-IS Extension for BIER BFD . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 4.2.2. OSPF Extension for BIER BFD . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 4.3. BGP Bootstrapping . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 5. Discriminators and Packet Demultiplexing . . . . . . . . . . 7 6. Active Tail in BIER BFD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 6.1. Unsolicited Head Notification Mode . . . . . . . . . . . 7 7. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 8. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 9. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 9.1. BIER OAM Message Type . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 9.2. BFD Discriminator TLV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 9.3. BIER BFD Sub-sub-TLV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 9.4. BIER BFD Sub-TLV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 9.5. BGP's BFD Discriminator Attribute Mode of P2MP Session with Active Tails . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 10. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 10.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 1. Introduction Bit Index Explicit Replication (BIER) [RFC8279] provides the forwarding of multicast data packets through a multicast domain. It does so without requiring any explicit tree-building protocol and without requiring intermediate nodes to maintain any per-flow state. [RFC8562] defines a method of using Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) to monitor and detect unicast failures between the sender (head) and one or more receivers (tails) in multipoint or multicast networks. [RFC8563] describes active tail extensions to the BFD protocol for multipoint networks. Xiong, et al. Expires 27 December 2024 [Page 2] Internet-Draft BIER BFD June 2024 This document describes the procedures for using such mode of BFD protocol to monitor connectivity between a multipoint sender, Bit- Forwarding Ingress Router (BFIR), and a set of one or more multipoint receivers, Bit-Forwarding Egress Routers (BFERs). The BIER BFD only supports the unidirectional multicast. This document defines the use of P2MP BFD as per [RFC8562], and active tail as per [RFC8563] for BIER-specific domain. 2. Conventions used in this document 2.1. Terminology This document uses the acronyms defined in [RFC8279] along with the following: BFD: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection. OAM: Operations, Administration, and Maintenance. P2MP: Point to Multi-Point. 2.2. Requirements Language The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here. 3. BIER BFD Encapsulation BIER BFD encapsulation uses the BIER OAM packet format defined in [I-D.ietf-bier-ping]. The value of the Message Type field MUST be set to BIER BFD (TBD1 will be assigned by IANA Section 9.1). BFD Control packet, defined in Section 4 [RFC5880], immediately follows the BIER OAM header. The operation of Multipoint BFD with the BFD Control Packet is described in [RFC8562]. 4. BIER BFD Session Bootstrapping As defined in [RFC8562], a BIER BFD session MAY be established to monitor the state of the multipoint path. The BIER BFD session could be created for each multipoint path and the set of BFERs over which the BFIR is requested to run BIER BFD. The BFIR MUST advertise the multipoint path and the value of My Discriminator associated with the path to the set of BFERs. The BFIR MUST bootstrap the BFD session and advertise the BFD information to the set of BFERs. Bootstrapping a BIER BFD session MAY use BIER OAM message (Section 4.1) or the Xiong, et al. Expires 27 December 2024 [Page 3] Internet-Draft BIER BFD June 2024 control plane (Section 4.2, Section 4.3). The BIER BFD bootstrapping MUST be repeated when the value of this discriminator being changed. 4.1. BIER OAM Bootstrapping The BIER OAM could be used for bootstrapping the BIER BFD session. The BFIR sends the BIER OAM Echo request message carrying a BFD discriminator TLV which immediately follows the Target SI-Bitstring TLV (section 3.3.2 [I-D.ietf-bier-ping]). The Target SI-Bitstring TLV MUST be used to carry the set of BFER information (including Sub-domain-id, Set ID, BS Len, Bitstring) for the purpose of the session establishment. Figure 1 displays the format of BFD Discriminator TLV. 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Type = TBD2 | Length | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | My Discriminator | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Figure 1: BFD Discriminator TLV where: * Type indicates BFD Discriminator TLV. The value (TBD2) is to be allocated by IANA (Section 9.2). * Length MUST be set to 4. * My Discriminator - four-octet long field. The value is the local discriminator generated by BFIR for this session. This discriminator MUST be used as the My Discriminator field n the BIER BFD Control packets sent by the BFIR. 4.2. IGP Bootstrapping An alternative option to bootstrap the BIER BFD using a BIER OAM message is to advertise the BFD information by an IGP protocol over the control plane. This document defines a new BIER BFD Sub-sub-TLV to carry BFD information in IGP protocols IS-IS and OSPF. Xiong, et al. Expires 27 December 2024 [Page 4] Internet-Draft BIER BFD June 2024 The BFIR generates the My Discriminator value for each multicast flow and advertises it to the expecting BFERs, which is indicated by the Bitstring and the BIFT-id, which is carried in BIER BFD sub-sub-TLV. The corresponding BFERs SHOULD store the My Discriminator value for packet Demultiplexing. 4.2.1. IS-IS Extension for BIER BFD The new BIER BFD Sub-sub-TLV is carried within the BIER Info sub-TLV defined in [RFC8401]. The format is displayed in Figure 2. 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Type = TBD3 | Length | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | My Discriminator | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | RESERVED | BIFT-id | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | BitString (first 32 bits) ~ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ~ ~ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ~ BitString (last 32 bits) | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Figure 2: BIER BFD Sub-sub-TLV for IS-IS Extension where: * Type indicates BIER BFD sub-sub-TLV. The value (TBD3) is to be allocated by IANA (Section 9.3). * Length is a two-octet field. The value is the length of the BIER BFD Sub-sub-TLV for IS-IS extension, in octets * My Discriminator is a four-octet long field. The value is a unique, nonzero discriminator value generated by BFIR for each multipoint path. This discriminator MUST be used as the My Discriminator field n the BIER BFD Control packets sent by the BFIR. * BIFT-id is a two-octet field. The value represents a particular Bit Index Forwarding Table (BIFT) as per [RFC8279]. Xiong, et al. Expires 27 December 2024 [Page 5] Internet-Draft BIER BFD June 2024 * BitString field carries the set of BFR-IDs of BFER(s) that the BFIR expects to establish the BIER BFD session. 4.2.2. OSPF Extension for BIER BFD The new BIER BFD Sub-TLV is a sub-TLV of the BIER Sub-TLV defined in [RFC8444]. The format is displayed in Figure 3. 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Type = TBD4 | Length | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | My Discriminator | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | RESERVED | BIFT-id | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | BitString (first 32 bits) ~ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ~ ~ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ~ BitString (last 32 bits) | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Figure 3: BIER BFD Sub-sub-TLV for OSPF Extension where: * Type indicates BIER BFD sub-TLV. The value (TBD4) is to be allocated by IANA (Section 9.4). * Length is a two-octet field. The value is the length of the BIER BFD sub-TLV for OSPF extension, in octets * My Discriminator is a four-octet long field. The value is a unique, nonzero discriminator value generated by BFIR for each multipoint path. This discriminator MUST be used as the My Discriminator field n the BIER BFD Control packets sent by the BFIR. * BIFT-id is a two-octet field. The value represents a particular Bit Index Forwarding Table (BIFT) as per [RFC8279]. * BitString field carries the set of BFR-IDs of BFER(s) that the BFIR expects to establish the BIER BFD session. Xiong, et al. Expires 27 December 2024 [Page 6] Internet-Draft BIER BFD June 2024 4.3. BGP Bootstrapping [RFC9026] describes the applicability of [RFC8562] in the detection of a Multicast Virtual Private Network. The new BGP Attribute, BFD Discriminator, can be used to bootstrap a p2mp BFD session according to [RFC8562]. To bootstrap a p2mp BFD session with active tails according to [RFC8563] IANA is requested to allocate a new value (TBD5) for the BFD Mode (Section 9.5). 5. Discriminators and Packet Demultiplexing As defined in [RFC8562], the BFIR sends BFD Control packets to the set of BFERs over the multipoint path via the BIER BFD session with My Discriminator is set to the value assigned by the BFIR, and the value of the Your Discriminator is set to zero. The set of BFERs MUST demultiplex BFD packets based on a combination of the source address, My Discriminator value. The source address is BFIR-id and BIER MPLS Label (MPLS network) or BFIR-id and BIFT-id (Non-MPLS network) for BIER BFD. My Discriminator value is advertised in BIER BFD bootstrapping using one of the options described in Section 4. 6. Active Tail in BIER BFD [RFC8563] defined an extension for Multipoint BFD, which allows the head to discover the state of a multicast distribution tree for any sub-set of tails. For BIER BFD in the active tail mode, the BFIR may learn the state and connectivity of the BFERs by allowing the BFERs to notify the BFIR. As per [RFC8563] provides detailed information on how the BFIR can use multipoint Poll sequence message or a combination of multicast and unicast Poll sequence messages to determine the state of the multicast tree. Also, [RFC8563] describes that a BFER can transmit an unsolicited unicast Poll sequence message to the BFIR (note that a unicast message must be sent over a path which is disjoint from the multicast distribution tree). 6.1. Unsolicited Head Notification Mode [I-D.ietf-mpls-p2mp-bfd] provides detailed information on using the unsolicited notification method for P2MP MPLS LSP, which is also applicable to BIER. In Section 5.2.1 [RFC8563] is noted that "the tail sends unsolicited BFD packets in response to the detection of a multipoint path failure" but without the specifics on the information in the packet and frequency of transmissions. This document defines the procedure of the active tail with unsolicited notifications for BIER as specified below. Xiong, et al. Expires 27 December 2024 [Page 7] Internet-Draft BIER BFD June 2024 Upon detecting the failure, a BFER sends a BFD control packet with the following settings: * the Poll (P) bit is set; * the Status (Sta) field is set to Down value; * the Diagnostic (Diag) field is set to Control Detection Time Expired value; * the value of the Your Discriminator field is set to the value the BFER has been used to demultiplex that BFD multipoint session; * BFD Control packet is encapsulated in IP/UDP with the destination IP address of the BFIR and the UDP destination port number set to 4784 per [RFC5883] * the BFD Control packets are transmitted at the rate of one per second until either the BFER receives valid for this BFD session control packet with the Final (F) bit is set from the BFIR or the defect condition clears. To improve the likelihood of notifying the BFIR of the failure, the BFER SHOULD transmit three BFD Control packets defined above in short succession. A BFIR that has received the BFD Control packet, as described above, sends the unicast IP/UDP encapsulated BFD control packet with the Final (F) bit set to the BFER. 7. Security Considerations For BIER OAM packet processing security considerations, see [I-D.ietf-bier-ping]. For general multipoint BFD security considerations, see [RFC8562]. No additional security issues are raised in this document beyond those that exist in the referenced BFD documents. 8. Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank the comments and suggestions from Sandy Zhang, Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang, Donald Eastlake 3rd. Xiong, et al. Expires 27 December 2024 [Page 8] Internet-Draft BIER BFD June 2024 9. IANA Considerations 9.1. BIER OAM Message Type IANA is requested to assign a new type from the BIER OAM Message Type registry as follows: +=======+=============+=================+ | Value | Description | Reference | +=======+=============+=================+ | TBD1 | BIER BFD | [this document] | +-------+-------------+-----------------+ Table 1 9.2. BFD Discriminator TLV IANA is requested to assign a new type from the BIER OAM TLV registry as follows: +=======+=======================+=================+ | Value | Description | Reference | +=======+=======================+=================+ | TBD2 | BFD discriminator TLV | [this document] | +-------+-----------------------+-----------------+ Table 2 9.3. BIER BFD Sub-sub-TLV IANA is requested to assign a new BIER BFD Sub-sub-TLV within the BIER Info sub-TLV registry is defined in [RFC8401] as follows: +=======+======================+=================+ | Value | Description | Reference | +=======+======================+=================+ | TBD3 | BIER BFD Sub-sub-TLV | [this document] | +-------+----------------------+-----------------+ Table 3 9.4. BIER BFD Sub-TLV IANA is requested to assign a new BIER BFD Sub-TLV from the BIER Sub- TLV registry is defined in [RFC8444] as follows: Xiong, et al. Expires 27 December 2024 [Page 9] Internet-Draft BIER BFD June 2024 +=======+==================+=================+ | Value | Description | Reference | +=======+==================+=================+ | TBD4 | BIER BFD Sub-TLV | [this document] | +-------+------------------+-----------------+ Table 4 9.5. BGP's BFD Discriminator Attribute Mode of P2MP Session with Active Tails IANA is requested to assign a new value from "BFD Mode" subregistry (defined in [RFC9026]) in the "Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) Parameters" registry according to Table 5: +=======+====================================+=================+ | Value | Description | Reference | +=======+====================================+=================+ | TBD5 | P2MP BFD Session with Active Tails | [this document] | +-------+------------------------------------+-----------------+ Table 5 10. References 10.1. Normative References [I-D.ietf-bier-ping] Nainar, N. K., Pignataro, C., Chen, M., and G. Mirsky, "BIER Ping and Trace", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-bier-ping-13, 27 January 2024, <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-bier- ping-13>. [I-D.ietf-mpls-p2mp-bfd] Mirsky, G., Mishra, G. S., and D. E. Eastlake, "BFD for Multipoint Networks over Point-to-Multi-Point MPLS LSP", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-mpls-p2mp- bfd-07, 2 March 2024, <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-mpls- p2mp-bfd-07>. [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>. Xiong, et al. Expires 27 December 2024 [Page 10] Internet-Draft BIER BFD June 2024 [RFC5880] Katz, D. and D. Ward, "Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD)", RFC 5880, DOI 10.17487/RFC5880, June 2010, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5880>. [RFC5883] Katz, D. and D. Ward, "Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) for Multihop Paths", RFC 5883, DOI 10.17487/RFC5883, June 2010, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5883>. [RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>. [RFC8279] Wijnands, IJ., Ed., Rosen, E., Ed., Dolganow, A., Przygienda, T., and S. Aldrin, "Multicast Using Bit Index Explicit Replication (BIER)", RFC 8279, DOI 10.17487/RFC8279, November 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8279>. [RFC8401] Ginsberg, L., Ed., Przygienda, T., Aldrin, S., and Z. Zhang, "Bit Index Explicit Replication (BIER) Support via IS-IS", RFC 8401, DOI 10.17487/RFC8401, June 2018, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8401>. [RFC8444] Psenak, P., Ed., Kumar, N., Wijnands, IJ., Dolganow, A., Przygienda, T., Zhang, J., and S. Aldrin, "OSPFv2 Extensions for Bit Index Explicit Replication (BIER)", RFC 8444, DOI 10.17487/RFC8444, November 2018, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8444>. [RFC8562] Katz, D., Ward, D., Pallagatti, S., Ed., and G. Mirsky, Ed., "Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) for Multipoint Networks", RFC 8562, DOI 10.17487/RFC8562, April 2019, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8562>. [RFC8563] Katz, D., Ward, D., Pallagatti, S., Ed., and G. Mirsky, Ed., "Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) Multipoint Active Tails", RFC 8563, DOI 10.17487/RFC8563, April 2019, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8563>. [RFC9026] Morin, T., Ed., Kebler, R., Ed., and G. Mirsky, Ed., "Multicast VPN Fast Upstream Failover", RFC 9026, DOI 10.17487/RFC9026, April 2021, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9026>. Authors' Addresses Xiong, et al. Expires 27 December 2024 [Page 11] Internet-Draft BIER BFD June 2024 Quan Xiong ZTE Corporation China Email: xiong.quan@zte.com.cn Greg Mirsky Ericsson Email: gregimirsky@gmail.com Fangwei Hu Individual Email: hufwei@gmail.com Chang Liu China Unicom No.9 Shouti Nanlu Beijing 100048 China Phone: +86-010-68799999-7294 Email: liuc131@chinaunicom.cn Gyan Mishra Verizon Inc. Email: gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com Xiong, et al. Expires 27 December 2024 [Page 12]