%% You should probably cite rfc6414 instead of this I-D.
@techreport{ietf-bmwg-protection-term-09,
    number =    {draft-ietf-bmwg-protection-term-09},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bmwg-protection-term/09/},
    author =    {Jay Karthik and Samir Vapiwala and Rajiv Papneja and Scott Poretsky},
    title =     {{Benchmarking Terminology for Protection Performance}},
    pagetotal = 33,
    year =      2010,
    month =     jul,
    day =       8,
    abstract =  {This document provides common terminology and metrics for benchmarking the performance of sub-IP layer protection mechanisms. The performance benchmarks are measured at the IP layer; protection may be provided at the sub-IP layer. The benchmarks and terminology can be applied in methodology documents for different sub-IP layer protection mechanisms such as Automatic Protection Switching (APS), Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol (VRRP), Stateful High Availability (HA), and Multiprotocol Label Switching Fast Reroute (MPLS-FRR). This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is published for informational purposes.},
}