%% You should probably cite rfc7502 instead of this I-D. @techreport{ietf-bmwg-sip-bench-meth-11, number = {draft-ietf-bmwg-sip-bench-meth-11}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bmwg-sip-bench-meth/11/}, author = {Carol Davids and Vijay K. Gurbani and Scott Poretsky}, title = {{Methodology for Benchmarking Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Devices: Basic session setup and registration}}, pagetotal = 21, year = 2014, month = jul, day = 2, abstract = {This document provides a methodology for benchmarking the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) performance of devices. Terminology related to benchmarking SIP devices is described in the companion terminology document. Using these two documents, benchmarks can be obtained and compared for different types of devices such as SIP Proxy Servers, Registrars and Session Border Controllers. The term "performance" in this context means the capacity of the device-under- test (DUT) to process SIP messages. Media streams are used only to study how they impact the signaling behavior. The intent of the two documents is to provide a normalized set of tests that will enable an objective comparison of the capacity of SIP devices. Test setup parameters and a methodology are necessary because SIP allows a wide range of configuration and operational conditions that can influence performance benchmark measurements.}, }