Terminology for Benchmarking Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Devices: Basic Session Setup and Registration
draft-ietf-bmwg-sip-bench-term-12
Yes
(Joel Jaeggli)
No Objection
(Adrian Farrel)
(Alia Atlas)
(Barry Leiba)
(Benoît Claise)
(Jari Arkko)
(Martin Stiemerling)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 11 and is now closed.
Joel Jaeggli Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -11)
Unknown
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -11)
Unknown
Alia Atlas Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -11)
Unknown
Alissa Cooper Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2014-10-29 for -11)
Unknown
= Section 2.1 = "A DUT MAY also include a B2BUA, SBC functionality." This seems like a strange use of normative language (especially because the "must" earlier in the same bullet is not normative). I think the intended meaning here was actually "may." = Section 3.1.4 = "Any media protocol MAY be used." Same comment as above -- what other choice is there if any media protocol is acceptable? I think this should be "may." = Section 3.3.2 = "Following the default value of T1 (500ms) specified in the table and a constant multiplier of 64 gives a value of 32 seconds for this timer (i.e., 500ms * 64 = 32s)." Is this just meant to be an example? Not sure what its purpose is. And it seems really long.
Barry Leiba Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -11)
Unknown
Benoît Claise Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -11)
Unknown
Brian Haberman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2014-10-20 for -11)
Unknown
I trust the shepherding AD and his review of this document.
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -11)
Unknown
Kathleen Moriarty Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2014-11-03 for -11)
Unknown
Thanks for adding text to address my comment: The security considerations look fine, but in reading the draft, it takes up until that section to learn that the tests are not performed on a production network and the follow on draft says they are intended for a lab environment. I think it would be useful to add this assumption into section 2.1 of this draft - that the benchmarks are intended for lab environments or not intended to be used on production networks as a DoS attack is possible using these methods.
Martin Stiemerling Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -11)
Unknown
Richard Barnes Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2014-10-29 for -11)
Unknown
I agree with Alissa's comment on media. Suggest: OLD: "Any media protocol MAY be used." NEW: "The format of the media is determined by the SDP attributes for the 'm' line in question." The phrase "media control protocol" is used in Section 3.1.3. I assume this is meant to mean RTCP? If so, it would be useful to note this.