Ballot for draft-ietf-bmwg-virtual-net
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 04 and is now closed.
Thanks for a well-written draft!
A clear and well-written doc - thanks!
I have a few mostly editorial comments: - Abstract and Introduction: Missing "the" before "Benchmarking..." -Abstract: Will the paragraph about new version history stay in the RFC? -1: Much of this section, especially the 2nd paragraph, reads like a commercial, or a marketing white paper. I'm not going to put this in the way of publication, but an IETF RFC should generally take a more neutral tone. It's enough to acknowledge that people are doing (or plan to do) NFV. -2: Language of the form of "BMG will consider" will quickly become dated. Consider something to the effect of "At the time of this writing, BMG is considering/plans to consider..." Can you offer a definition or citation for "bare metal"? "Also, benchmarking combinations of physical and virtual devices and functions in a System Under Test.": Sentence fragment. - 4.2, first paragraph, last sentence: Can you offer a citation for the 4x3 matrix? :
Thanks for the well written doc!