%% You should probably cite draft-ietf-calext-subscription-upgrade-09 instead of this revision.
@techreport{ietf-calext-subscription-upgrade-00,
    number =    {draft-ietf-calext-subscription-upgrade-00},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-calext-subscription-upgrade/00/},
    author =    {Michael Douglass},
    title =     {{Calendar subscription upgrades}},
    pagetotal = 15,
    year =      ,
    month =     ,
    day =       ,
    abstract =  {This specification introduces an approach to allow subscribers to calendar feeds to upgrade to a more performant protocol. This specification updates {[}RFC5545{]} to add the value DELETED to the STATUS property. This specification also updates {[}RFC7240{]} to add the subscribe- enhanced-get and limit preferences.},
}