Skip to main content

Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Architecture
draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-architecture-07

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2004-11-01
07 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2004-11-01
07 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2004-10-19
07 Bill Fenner
In Authors' 48 hours:

From: RFC Editor
Subject: authors 48 hours: RFC 3945
          NOW AVAILABLE
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 …
In Authors' 48 hours:

From: RFC Editor
Subject: authors 48 hours: RFC 3945
          NOW AVAILABLE
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 14:02:02 -0700
To: eric_mannie@hotmail.com
Cc: RFC Editor , Bert Wijnen
    , Alex Zinin , Bill Fenner
    , kireeti@juniper.net,
    adrian@olddog.co.uk
2003-06-27
07 (System) IESG has approved the document
2003-05-29
07 Natalia Syracuse State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Syracuse, Natalia
2003-05-22
07 Dinara Suleymanova State Changes to Approved-announcement sent from Approved-announcement to be sent by Suleymanova, Dinara
2003-05-19
07 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-architecture-07.txt
2003-05-13
07 Bert Wijnen
Authors are still working on a revision 7 to address editorial comments from IESG

>From: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)"  >To: "Iesg-Secretary (E-mail)"  >Subject: RE: draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-architecture-06.txt Jackie, …
Authors are still working on a revision 7 to address editorial comments from IESG

>From: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)"  >To: "Iesg-Secretary (E-mail)"  >Subject: RE: draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-architecture-06.txt Jackie, although this change in vote from Steve clears the doc for announcement, can you pls hold on that for a few days. I expect yet one more rev that will address a few nits raised by other ADs. Thanks, Bert
2003-05-13
07 Bert Wijnen Status date has been changed to 2003-05-12 from 2003-04-10
2003-05-12
07 Jacqueline Hargest State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Hargest, Jacqueline
2003-05-07
07 Bert Wijnen
Concerns about too many normative references that are still in the I-D stage.
Not sure Security Considerations section is now acceptable to Security AD(s).

Bert …
Concerns about too many normative references that are still in the I-D stage.
Not sure Security Considerations section is now acceptable to Security AD(s).

Bert is checking where we are and what (if anything) needs to be done.
2003-04-28
06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-architecture-06.txt
2003-04-10
07 Jacqueline Hargest State Changes to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by Hargest, Jacqueline
2003-04-09
07 Bert Wijnen I have marked it for going onto the agenda for April 17th.
2003-03-27
07 Jacqueline Hargest Status date has been changed to 2003-04-10 from 2003-03-01
2003-03-27
07 Jacqueline Hargest State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Hargest, Jacqueline
2003-03-27
07 (System) Last call sent
2003-03-24
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-architecture-05.txt
2003-03-01
07 Bert Wijnen Status date has been changed to 2003-03-01 from 2002-09-30
2003-03-01
07 Bert Wijnen State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation  :: Point Raised - writeup needed by Wijnen, Bert
2003-02-28
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-architecture-04.txt
2003-02-18
07 Bert Wijnen
AD is discussing with WG chairs if they have checked all the content to be correct and factual.

What we seem to be seeing is: …
AD is discussing with WG chairs if they have checked all the content to be correct and factual.

What we seem to be seeing is:
> - glaring grammatical problems
> - references to obsolete RFCs
> - rambling passages

Another question:
> - have all the (32 people, 3 pages) authors/contributors,
>  which are listed so ostensibly, read the documents
>  and are they all ready to take responsibility for
>  the content to be correct.
2002-09-26
07 Bert Wijnen Made  previous comment private cause it belongs to another document, not this one.
2002-09-26
07 Bert Wijnen A new comment added
by bwijnen
2002-09-26
07 Bert Wijnen
On 29 August 2002, I asked the WG chairs:
> And how far have these documents been discussed in
> the RTG (OSPF) WGs? At …
On 29 August 2002, I asked the WG chairs:
> And how far have these documents been discussed in
> the RTG (OSPF) WGs? At least the relevant RTG WGs
> should have been made aware of these docs being in
> WG Last Call, or so I think.
>
Sofar I have not received an answer and today I asked
again.
2002-09-26
07 Bert Wijnen responsible has been changed to Responsible AD from Bert
2002-09-26
07 Bert Wijnen State Changes to AD Evaluation  -- Point Raised from Pre AD Evaluation by bwijnen
2002-09-03
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-architecture-03.txt
2002-08-27
07 Stephen Coya Draft Added by scoya
2002-03-05
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-architecture-02.txt
2001-11-29
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-architecture-01.txt
2001-07-02
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-architecture-00.txt