Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Architecture
draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-architecture-07
Revision differences
Document history
Date | Rev. | By | Action |
---|---|---|---|
2004-11-01
|
07 | (System) | Ballot writeup text was added |
2004-11-01
|
07 | (System) | Ballot approval text was added |
2004-10-19
|
07 | Bill Fenner | In Authors' 48 hours: From: RFC Editor Subject: authors 48 hours: RFC 3945 NOW AVAILABLE Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 … In Authors' 48 hours: From: RFC Editor Subject: authors 48 hours: RFC 3945 NOW AVAILABLE Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 14:02:02 -0700 To: eric_mannie@hotmail.com Cc: RFC Editor , Bert Wijnen , Alex Zinin , Bill Fenner , kireeti@juniper.net, adrian@olddog.co.uk |
2003-06-27
|
07 | (System) | IESG has approved the document |
2003-05-29
|
07 | Natalia Syracuse | State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Syracuse, Natalia |
2003-05-22
|
07 | Dinara Suleymanova | State Changes to Approved-announcement sent from Approved-announcement to be sent by Suleymanova, Dinara |
2003-05-19
|
07 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-architecture-07.txt |
2003-05-13
|
07 | Bert Wijnen | Authors are still working on a revision 7 to address editorial comments from IESG >From: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" >To: "Iesg-Secretary (E-mail)" >Subject: RE: draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-architecture-06.txt Jackie, … Authors are still working on a revision 7 to address editorial comments from IESG >From: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" >To: "Iesg-Secretary (E-mail)" >Subject: RE: draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-architecture-06.txt Jackie, although this change in vote from Steve clears the doc for announcement, can you pls hold on that for a few days. I expect yet one more rev that will address a few nits raised by other ADs. Thanks, Bert |
2003-05-13
|
07 | Bert Wijnen | Status date has been changed to 2003-05-12 from 2003-04-10 |
2003-05-12
|
07 | Jacqueline Hargest | State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Hargest, Jacqueline |
2003-05-07
|
07 | Bert Wijnen | Concerns about too many normative references that are still in the I-D stage. Not sure Security Considerations section is now acceptable to Security AD(s). Bert … Concerns about too many normative references that are still in the I-D stage. Not sure Security Considerations section is now acceptable to Security AD(s). Bert is checking where we are and what (if anything) needs to be done. |
2003-04-28
|
06 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-architecture-06.txt |
2003-04-10
|
07 | Jacqueline Hargest | State Changes to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by Hargest, Jacqueline |
2003-04-09
|
07 | Bert Wijnen | I have marked it for going onto the agenda for April 17th. |
2003-03-27
|
07 | Jacqueline Hargest | Status date has been changed to 2003-04-10 from 2003-03-01 |
2003-03-27
|
07 | Jacqueline Hargest | State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Hargest, Jacqueline |
2003-03-27
|
07 | (System) | Last call sent |
2003-03-24
|
05 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-architecture-05.txt |
2003-03-01
|
07 | Bert Wijnen | Status date has been changed to 2003-03-01 from 2002-09-30 |
2003-03-01
|
07 | Bert Wijnen | State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation :: Point Raised - writeup needed by Wijnen, Bert |
2003-02-28
|
04 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-architecture-04.txt |
2003-02-18
|
07 | Bert Wijnen | AD is discussing with WG chairs if they have checked all the content to be correct and factual. What we seem to be seeing is: … AD is discussing with WG chairs if they have checked all the content to be correct and factual. What we seem to be seeing is: > - glaring grammatical problems > - references to obsolete RFCs > - rambling passages Another question: > - have all the (32 people, 3 pages) authors/contributors, > which are listed so ostensibly, read the documents > and are they all ready to take responsibility for > the content to be correct. |
2002-09-26
|
07 | Bert Wijnen | Made previous comment private cause it belongs to another document, not this one. |
2002-09-26
|
07 | Bert Wijnen | A new comment added by bwijnen |
2002-09-26
|
07 | Bert Wijnen | On 29 August 2002, I asked the WG chairs: > And how far have these documents been discussed in > the RTG (OSPF) WGs? At … On 29 August 2002, I asked the WG chairs: > And how far have these documents been discussed in > the RTG (OSPF) WGs? At least the relevant RTG WGs > should have been made aware of these docs being in > WG Last Call, or so I think. > Sofar I have not received an answer and today I asked again. |
2002-09-26
|
07 | Bert Wijnen | responsible has been changed to Responsible AD from Bert |
2002-09-26
|
07 | Bert Wijnen | State Changes to AD Evaluation -- Point Raised from Pre AD Evaluation by bwijnen |
2002-09-03
|
03 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-architecture-03.txt |
2002-08-27
|
07 | Stephen Coya | Draft Added by scoya |
2002-03-05
|
02 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-architecture-02.txt |
2001-11-29
|
01 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-architecture-01.txt |
2001-07-02
|
00 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-architecture-00.txt |