Generalized Labels for Lambda-Switch-Capable (LSC) Label Switching Routers
draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-g-694-lambda-labels-11
Yes
(Adrian Farrel)
No Objection
(Dan Romascanu)
(David Harrington)
(Gonzalo Camarillo)
(Lars Eggert)
(Peter Saint-Andre)
(Ralph Droms)
(Robert Sparks)
(Ron Bonica)
(Russ Housley)
(Sean Turner)
(Tim Polk)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 11 and is now closed.
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Alexey Melnikov Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2011-01-20)
Unknown
I am missing some text about byte order for 16bit fields.
Dan Romascanu Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
David Harrington Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Gonzalo Camarillo Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Lars Eggert Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Peter Saint-Andre Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ralph Droms Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Robert Sparks Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Sean Turner Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Stewart Bryant Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2011-01-19)
Unknown
"In the scenario of Figure 1, consider the setting up of a bidirectional LSP from ingress switch 1 to egress switch 9 using GMPLS RSVP-TE." Figure 1 shows them as nodes ======= To deal with the widening scope of MPLS into the optical and time domains I think that you mean ... optical switching and time division multiplexing domains. ======= In a case, the label indicates the wavelength to be used for the LSP. Do you mean "In this case.." ? ======
Tim Polk Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown