Skip to main content

RSVP-TE Extensions in Support of End-to-End Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Recovery
draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-recovery-e2e-signaling-04

Yes

(Ross Callon)

No Objection

(Bill Fenner)
(Cullen Jennings)
(Dan Romascanu)
(David Kessens)
(Jari Arkko)
(Jon Peterson)
(Lars Eggert)
(Magnus Westerlund)
(Mark Townsley)
(Sam Hartman)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 04 and is now closed.

Ross Callon Former IESG member
Yes
Yes () Unknown

                            
Bill Fenner Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Brian Carpenter Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2006-10-20) Unknown
From Gen-ART review by Pasi Eronen:

There is one minor nit (but IANA/RFC editor will take care of it):
sections 9.3 and 9.4 suggest the same value (198) forthe
SECONDARY_EXPLICIT_ROUTE and SECONDARY_RECORD_ROUTE objects.
Cullen Jennings Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Dan Romascanu Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
David Kessens Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Jon Peterson Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Lars Eggert Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Magnus Westerlund Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Mark Townsley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2006-10-24) Unknown
  s/IPSEC/IPsec/

  When recommending the use of IPsec, please point to section 12
  of [RFC3473].
Sam Hartman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Ted Hardie Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2006-10-23) Unknown
Nit:

Extended Tunnel ID  
    
        A 32-bit (or 16-byte) identifier used in the SESSION that  
        remains constant over the life of the tunnel. Normally set to  
        all zeros. Ingress nodes that wish to narrow the scope of a  
        SESSION to the ingress-egress pair MAY place their IPv4 (or  
        IPv6) address here as a globally unique identifier.  

I think it would be better to say 32-bit or 128-bit identifer; this is
more consistent, avoids the "byte is not always octet" gotcha, and seems
closer to the typical usage for v6 address discussions.