%% You should probably cite rfc4873 instead of this I-D.
@techreport{ietf-ccamp-gmpls-segment-recovery-03,
    number =    {draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-segment-recovery-03},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-segment-recovery/03/},
    author =    {Adrian Farrel and Igor Bryskin and Dimitri Papadimitriou and Lou Berger},
    title =     {{GMPLS Segment Recovery}},
    pagetotal = 25,
    year =      2006,
    month =     oct,
    day =       6,
    abstract =  {This document describes protocol specific procedures for GMPLS (Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching) RSVP-TE (Resource ReserVation Protocol - Traffic Engineering) signaling extensions to support label switched path (LSP) segment protection and restoration. These extensions are intended to complement and be consistent with the RSVP-TE Extensions for End-to-End GMPLS Recovery (RFC 4872). Implications and interactions with fast reroute are also addressed. This document also updates the handling of NOTIFY\_REQUEST objects. {[}STANDARDS-TRACK{]}},
}