Link Management Protocol Behavior Negotiation and Configuration Modifications
draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-behavior-negotiation-11
Yes
(Adrian Farrel)
No Objection
(Barry Leiba)
(Benoît Claise)
(Gonzalo Camarillo)
(Martin Stiemerling)
(Ralph Droms)
(Robert Sparks)
(Ron Bonica)
(Russ Housley)
(Sean Turner)
(Stephen Farrell)
(Stewart Bryant)
(Wesley Eddy)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 10 and is now closed.
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -10)
Unknown
Barry Leiba Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -10)
Unknown
Benoît Claise Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -10)
Unknown
Brian Haberman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2013-02-06 for -10)
Unknown
I agree with Pete's question about interest in implementing.
Gonzalo Camarillo Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -10)
Unknown
Martin Stiemerling Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -10)
Unknown
Pete Resnick Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2013-02-03 for -10)
Unknown
A strictly procedural question for the shepherd and the AD. The writeup says: There have been no public statements related to implementations, though significant interest was expressed by the working group to progress this extension of the LMP protocol in support of future extensions. The two halves of that sentence seem incongruous. If there is no indication that anyone wants to use this extension mechanism, but it's just that it seems like a good idea for future extensions, I wonder why this is worth doing, especially given backwards compatibility issues outlined in section 4. Is there really nobody that is planning a new extension that intends to use this mechanism? I don't intend to block the document on these grounds, but I do think it is worth an answer. The shepherd writeup was extremely thin all around.
Ralph Droms Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -10)
Unknown
Robert Sparks Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -10)
Unknown
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -10)
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(for -10)
Unknown
Sean Turner Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -10)
Unknown
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -10)
Unknown
Stewart Bryant Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -10)
Unknown
Wesley Eddy Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -10)
Unknown