Resource ReserVation Protocol-Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE) Path Diversity using Exclude Route
draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-diversity-05
| Document | Type | Replaced Internet-Draft (teas WG) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last updated | 2014-12-08 (latest revision 2014-10-27) | ||
| Replaces | draft-ali-ccamp-xro-lsp-subobject, draft-fedyk-ccamp-uni-extensions | ||
| Replaced by | draft-ietf-teas-lsp-diversity | ||
| Stream | IETF | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats |
Expired & archived
plain text
pdf
html
bibtex
|
||
| Stream | WG state | Dead WG Document | |
| Document shepherd | No shepherd assigned | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Replaced by draft-ietf-teas-lsp-diversity | |
| Consensus Boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| Telechat date | |||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) | ||
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-diversity-05.txt
Abstract
RFC 4874 specifies methods by which path exclusions can be communicated during RSVP-TE signaling in networks where precise explicit paths are not computed by the LSP source node. This document specifies procedures for additional route exclusion subobject based on Paths currently existing or expected to exist within the network.
Authors
Zafar Ali
(zali@cisco.com)
George Swallow
(swallow@cisco.com)
Fatai Zhang
(zhangfatai@huawei.com)
Dieter Beller
(dieter.beller@alcatel-lucent.com)
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)