%% You should probably cite draft-ietf-teas-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp instead of this I-D.
@techreport{ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-02,
    number =    {draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-02},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp/02/},
    author =    {Fei Zhang and Ruiquan Jing},
    title =     {{RSVP-TE Extensions for Associated Bidirectional LSPs}},
    pagetotal = 12,
    year =      ,
    month =     ,
    day =       ,
    abstract =  {The MPLS Transport Profile (MPLS-TP) requirements document {[}RFC5654{]}, describes that MPLS-TP MUST support associated bidirectional point- to-point LSPs. This document provides a method to bind two unidirectional Label Switched Paths (LSPs) into an associated bidirectional LSP. The association is achieved by using a new Association Type in the Extended ASSOCIATION object.},
}