%% You should probably cite draft-ietf-teas-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp instead of this I-D. @techreport{ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-04, number = {draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-04}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp/04/}, author = {Fei Zhang and Ruiquan Jing and Rakesh Gandhi}, title = {{RSVP-TE Extensions for Associated Bidirectional LSPs}}, pagetotal = 17, year = 2012, month = aug, day = 15, abstract = {The MPLS Transport Profile (MPLS-TP) requirements document {[}RFC5654{]}, describes that MPLS-TP MUST support associated bidirectional point- to-point LSPs. This document provides a method to bind two unidirectional Label Switched Paths (LSPs) into an associated bidirectional LSP. The association is achieved by defining the new Association Type in the Extended ASSOCIATION object.}, }