%% You should probably cite draft-ietf-teas-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp instead of this I-D.
@techreport{ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-08,
    number =    {draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-08},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp/08/},
    author =    {Fei Zhang and Ruiquan Jing and Rakesh Gandhi},
    title =     {{RSVP-TE Extensions for Associated Bidirectional LSPs}},
    pagetotal = 16,
    year =      2014,
    month =     mar,
    day =       3,
    abstract =  {This document describes Resource reSerVation Protocol (RSVP) extensions to bind two point-to-point unidirectional Label Switched Paths (LSPs) into an associated bidirectional LSP. The association is achieved by defining the new Association Types in (Extended) ASSOCIATION object. In addition, RSVP extensions allow asymmetric upstream and downstream bandwidths for the bidirectional LSP.},
}