Ballot for draft-ietf-ccamp-mw-topo-yang
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 10 and is now closed.
Thanks for this document. I have some minor comments below, that I hope may be helpful. Also, thanks to Éric for being special guest AD, and to Daniele for the shepherd write-up. ### Section 1.1, unused terms MSDC is defined but only used once... prior to this section, and with in-line expansion already. So, I think the abbreviation can be removed. Same for PNC. ### Section 1.2, incorrect xref “A simplified graphical representation of the data model is used in chapter 3.1 of this document.” RFCs don’t have “chapters”, they have “sections”, but more importantly this document doesn’t have a section (or chapter) 3.1. I guess you need to update your cross reference. Probably you mean Section 2.1? ### Appendices Thank you for the clear diagrams, they’re very helpful. Just curious, what tool did you use to produce them? (Assuming the different renderings weren't hand-crafted that is.)
I am acting as the responsible AD, replacing John Scudder for this I-D. AD review was done and authors have replied and acted upon my review.
Section 1.1 defines "SNIR", though this term appears nowhere else in the document.
Thank you to Joseph Salowey for the SECDIR review. ** Section 3. The Security Considerations for writing to these nodes is discussed. Would there any any circumstances where read access to these nodes would be problematic?
Nice catch on Rob's part! Thank you for this document.
Thanks for addressing my concern.