OSPF-Traffic Engineering Link Availability Extension for Links with Variable Discrete Bandwidth
draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-availability-extension-11
The information below is for an old version of the document | |||
---|---|---|---|
Document | Type | Active Internet-Draft (ccamp WG) | |
Authors | Hao Long , Min Ye , Greg Mirsky , Alessandro D'Alessandro , Himanshu Shah | ||
Last updated | 2017-11-03 (latest revision 2017-10-24) | ||
Replaces | draft-long-ccamp-ospf-availability-extension | ||
Stream | IETF | ||
Intended RFC status | Proposed Standard | ||
Formats | pdf htmlized (tools) htmlized bibtex | ||
Reviews | |||
Stream | WG state | WG Document | |
Document shepherd | Fatai Zhang | ||
Shepherd write-up | Show (last changed 2017-09-26) | ||
IESG | IESG state | IESG Evaluation::AD Followup | |
Consensus Boilerplate | Yes | ||
Telechat date |
Needs 6 more YES or NO OBJECTION positions to pass. |
||
Responsible AD | Deborah Brungard | ||
Send notices to | "Fatai Zhang" <zhangfatai@huawei.com> | ||
IANA | IANA review state | IANA OK - Actions Needed |
Network Working Group H. Long, M.Ye Internet Draft Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd Intended status: Standards Track G. Mirsky ZTE A.D'Alessandro Telecom Italia S.p.A H. Shah Ciena Expires: April 2018 October 24, 2017 OSPF-Traffic Engineering Link Availability Extension for Links with Variable Discrete Bandwidth draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-availability-extension-11.txt Abstract A network may contain links with variable discrete bandwidth, e.g., copper, radio, etc. The bandwidth of such links may change discretely in reaction to changing external environment. Availability is typically used for describing such links during network planning. This document defines a new type of the Generalized Switching Capability-specific information (SCSI) TLV to extend the Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) routing protocol. The extension can be used for route computation in a network that contains links with variable discrete bandwidth. Note, this document only covers the mechanisms by which the availability information is distributed. The mechanisms by which availability information of a link is determined and the use of the distributed information for route computation are outside the scope of this document. It is intended that technology- specific documents will reference this document to describe specific uses. Status of this Memo This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet- Drafts. Long, et al. Expires April 24, 2018 [Page 1] Internet-Draft Availability extension to OSPF-TE October 2017 Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html This Internet-Draft will expire on April 24, 2018. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2017 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License. Table of Contents 1. Introduction ................................................ 3 2. Acronyms .................................................... 3 3. Overview .................................................... 4 4. TE Metric Extension to OSPF-TE............................... 4 4.1. Availability SCSI-TLV................................... 4 4.2. Processing Procedures................................... 5 5. Security Considerations...................................... 6 6. IANA Considerations ......................................... 6 7. References .................................................. 7 7.1. Normative References.................................... 7 7.2. Informative References.................................. 7 8. Acknowledgments ............................................. 8 Conventions used in this document Long, et al. Expires April 24, 2018 [Page 2] Internet-Draft Availability extension to OSPF-TE October 2017 The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED","MAY", andShow full document text