Common YANG Data Types for Layer 0 Optical Networks
draft-ietf-ccamp-rfc9093-bis-19

Yes

Ketan Talaulikar
Mohamed Boucadair

No Objection

Andy Newton
Deb Cooley
Éric Vyncke
Erik Kline
Gunter Van de Velde
Jim Guichard
Mahesh Jethanandani
Orie Steele
Paul Wouters
Roman Danyliw

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 15 and is now closed.

Ketan Talaulikar
Yes
Mohamed Boucadair
(was Discuss) Yes
Comment (2025-08-07 for -16) Sent 
Hi Sergio, Italo, Dieter, Esther, and Aihua, 

Thank you for addressing my DISCUSS/COMMENT points [1] in -16 [2].

ACK for the note on the tree and I trust that you will make sure the broken tree is fixed during AUTH48.

Cheers,
Med

[1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/cHYT2e77x4zVwqeP2t6EZxeivFc/

[2] https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url1=draft-ietf-ccamp-rfc9093-bis-15&url2=draft-ietf-ccamp-rfc9093-bis-16&difftype=--html
Andy Newton
No Objection
Deb Cooley
No Objection
Comment (2025-07-06 for -15) Sent 
One very easy comment: 

Normative References:  If a draft is being obsoleted, then it can't be normative.  Please make RFC9093 Informative.
Éric Vyncke
No Objection
Comment (2025-07-07 for -15) Sent 
# Éric Vyncke, INT AD, comments for draft-ietf-ccamp-rfc9093-bis-15
CC @evyncke

Thank you for the work put into this document.

Please find below some non-blocking COMMENT points/nits (replies would be appreciated even if only for my own education).

Special thanks to Daniele Ceccarelli for the shepherd's detailed write-up including the WG consensus *but it lacks* the justification of the intended status.

I hope that this review helps to improve the document,

Regards,

-éric

## COMMENTS (non-blocking)

### Title

Please add "optical" in the title as the content is "only" about optical layer-0. Section 1.1 indicates the "limited" scope but it should be refleted in the title as well.

### Appendix A

Even when the tree is long, I prefer to have it in the middle part of the I-D not as an appendix. But, I guess that this is a matter of taste.
Erik Kline
No Objection
Gunter Van de Velde
No Objection
Jim Guichard
No Objection
Mahesh Jethanandani
(was Discuss) No Objection
Comment (2025-08-22 for -16) Sent 
Hi Authors, thanks for addressing my DISCUSS and COMMENTs.
Orie Steele
No Objection
Paul Wouters
No Objection
Roman Danyliw
No Objection
Comment (2025-07-07 for -15) Not sent 
Thank you to Thomas Fossati for the GENART review.