Ethernet Traffic Parameters with Availability Information
draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-bandwidth-availability-14

The information below is for an old version of the document
Document Type Active Internet-Draft (ccamp WG)
Last updated 2019-04-11 (latest revision 2019-03-06)
Replaces draft-long-ccamp-rsvp-te-bandwidth-availability
Stream IETF
Intended RFC status Proposed Standard
Formats pdf htmlized bibtex
Reviews
Stream WG state Submitted to IESG for Publication
Document shepherd Daniele Ceccarelli
Shepherd write-up Show (last changed 2018-10-26)
IESG IESG state IESG Evaluation::Revised I-D Needed
Consensus Boilerplate Yes
Telechat date
Has enough positions to pass.
Responsible AD Deborah Brungard
Send notices to Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>
IANA IANA review state IANA OK - Actions Needed
Network Working Group                                    H. Long, M. Ye 
Internet Draft                             Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd         
Intended status: Standards Track                              G. Mirsky  
                                                                    ZTE 
                                                         A.D'Alessandro 
                                                   Telecom Italia S.p.A 
                                                                H. Shah 
                                                                  Ciena         
Expires: September 2019                                   March 6, 2019  
 
                                      
         Ethernet Traffic Parameters with Availability Information  
           draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-bandwidth-availability-14.txt 

Abstract 

   A packet switching network may contain links with variable 
   bandwidth, e.g., copper, radio, etc. The bandwidth of such links is 
   sensitive to external environment (e.g., climate). Availability is 
   typically used for describing these links when doing network 
   planning. This document introduces an optional Availability TLV in 
   Resource ReSerVation Protocol - Traffic Engineer (RSVP-TE) 
   signaling. This extension can be used to set up a Generalized Multi-
   Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Label Switched Path (LSP) in 
   conjunction with the Ethernet SENDER_TSPEC object. 

Status of this Memo 

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the 
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.  

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering 
   Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups.  Note that 
   other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
   Drafts. 

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six 
   months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents 
   at any time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as 
   reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." 

   The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at 
   http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt 

   The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at 
   http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html 

 
 
 
Long, et al.          Expires September 6, 2019               [Page 1] 


Internet-Draft    Availability extension to RSVP-TE         March 2019 
    

   This Internet-Draft will expire on September 6, 2019. 

Copyright Notice 

   Copyright (c) 2019 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the 
   document authors. All rights reserved. 

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal 
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents 
   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of 
   publication of this document. Please review these documents 
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with 
   respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this 
   document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in 
   Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without 
   warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License. 

Table of Contents 

   1. Introduction ................................................ 3 
   2. Overview .................................................... 4 
   3. Extension to RSVP-TE Signaling............................... 5 
      3.1. Availability TLV........................................ 5 
      3.2. Signaling Process....................................... 6 
   4. Security Considerations...................................... 7 
   5. IANA Considerations ......................................... 7 
      5.1  Ethernet Sender TSpec TLVs ............................. 7 
   6. References .................................................. 8 
      6.1. Normative References.................................... 8 
      6.2. Informative References.................................. 8 
   7. Appendix: Bandwidth Availability Example..................... 9 
   8. Acknowledgments ............................................ 10 
 
Conventions used in this document 

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", 
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and 
   "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in 
   BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all 
   capitals, as shown here. 

   The following acronyms are used in this draft: 

   RSVP-TE  Resource Reservation Protocol-Traffic Engineering 

   LSP      Label Switched Path 

 
 
Long, et al.          Expires September 6, 2019               [Page 2] 


Internet-Draft    Availability extension to RSVP-TE         March 2019 
    

   SNR      Signal-to-noise Ratio 

   TLV      Type Length Value 
Show full document text