Resource ReserVation Protocol-Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE) extension for recording TE Metric of a Label Switched Path
draft-ietf-ccamp-te-metric-recording-04
| Document | Type | Replaced Internet-Draft (teas WG) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last updated | 2014-12-08 (latest revision 2014-08-20) | ||
| Replaces | draft-ali-ccamp-te-metric-recording | ||
| Replaced by | draft-ietf-teas-te-metric-recording | ||
| Stream | IETF | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats |
Expired & archived
pdf
htmlized
bibtex
|
||
| Stream | WG state | Dead WG Document | |
| Document shepherd | No shepherd assigned | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Replaced by draft-ietf-teas-te-metric-recording | |
| Consensus Boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| Telechat date | |||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) | ||
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-ccamp-te-metric-recording-04.txt
Abstract
There are many scenarios in which Traffic Engineering (TE) metrics such as cost, latency and latency variation associated with a Forwarding Adjacency (FA) or Routing Adjacency (RA) Label Switched Path (LSP) are not available to the ingress and egress nodes. This draft provides extensions for the Resource ReserVation Protocol- Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE) for the support of the discovery of cost, latency and latency variation of an LSP.
Authors
Zafar Ali
(zali@cisco.com)
George Swallow
(swallow@cisco.com)
Clarence Filsfils
(cfilsfil@cisco.com)
Matt Hartley
(mhartley@cisco.com)
Kenji Kumaki
(ke-kumaki@kddi.com)
Ruediger Kunze
(ruediger.kunze@telekom.de)
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)