%% You should probably cite draft-ietf-teas-te-metric-recording instead of this I-D.
@techreport{ietf-ccamp-te-metric-recording-02,
    number =    {draft-ietf-ccamp-te-metric-recording-02},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-te-metric-recording/02/},
    author =    {Zafar Ali and George Swallow and Clarence Filsfils and Matt Hartley and Kenji Kumaki and Ruediger Kunze},
    title =     {{Resource ReserVation Protocol-Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE) extension for recording TE Metric of a Label Switched Path}},
    pagetotal = 12,
    year =      2013,
    month =     jul,
    day =       14,
    abstract =  {There are many scenarios in which Traffic Engineering (TE) metrics such as cost, latency and latency variation associated with a Forwarding Adjacency (FA) or Routing Adjacency (RA) Label Switched Path (LSP) are not available to the ingress and egress nodes. This draft provides extensions for the Resource ReserVation Protocol- Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE) for the support of the discovery of cost, latency and latency variation of an LSP.},
}