%% You should probably cite rfc5073 instead of this I-D. @techreport{ietf-ccamp-te-node-cap-05, number = {draft-ietf-ccamp-te-node-cap-05}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-te-node-cap/05/}, author = {Jean-Louis Le Roux and JP Vasseur}, title = {{IGP Routing Protocol Extensions for Discovery of Traffic Engineering Node Capabilities}}, pagetotal = 13, year = 2007, month = apr, day = 4, abstract = {It is highly desired, in several cases, to take into account Traffic Engineering (TE) node capabilities during Multi Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) and Generalized MPLS (GMPLS) Traffic Engineered Label Switched Path (TE-LSP) selection, such as, for instance, the capability to act as a branch Label Switching Router (LSR) of a Point-To-MultiPoint (P2MP) LSP. This requires advertising these capabilities within the Interior Gateway Protocol (IGP). For that purpose, this document specifies Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) and Intermediate System-Intermediate System (IS-IS) traffic engineering extensions for the advertisement of control plane and data plane traffic engineering node capabilities. {[}STANDARDS-TRACK{]}}, }