Ballot deferred by Barry Leiba on 2019-12-03.
Summary: Needs 7 more YES or NO OBJECTION positions to pass.
Section 1. Please add a reference to Matroska instead of an inline URL Section 1. Please add a reference for WebM Section 2 and Table 4 of Section 5. These sections define EBML Class. However, it isn’t used else where in the document. What is it supposed to be used for? Section 4.4. Recommend replacing “This table” text to be the name of specific table in question (i.e., Table 1, Table 2) Section 6.2. Per “Unknown-Sized Element MUST NOT be used or defined unnecessarily; however if the Element Data Size is not known before the Element Data is written, such as in some cases of data streaming, then Unknown- Sized Elements MAY be used.”, should this text be read as “the Unknown- Sized Elements MUST only be used if the Element Data Size is not known before the Element Data is written”. I’m having trouble understanding how to handle normative language for a qualitative statement of “unnecessarily” Section 126.96.36.199. Double checking on the grammar of the name attribute – it is permitted to start with a “-“ or a “.”? Section 188.8.131.52. Are there any uniqueness properties for an id attribute? Drawing a parallel from XML, I would have thought that each EBML element would have unique ID per doctype (say like an xml:id) Section 184.108.40.206. documentation@purpose has a number of possible enumerated values, however, none are defined in the text (they are only listed)