%% You should probably cite rfc9175 instead of this I-D.
@techreport{ietf-core-echo-request-tag-09,
    number =    {draft-ietf-core-echo-request-tag-09},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-core-echo-request-tag/09/},
    author =    {Christian Amsüss and John Preuß Mattsson and Göran Selander},
    title =     {{CoAP: Echo, Request-Tag, and Token Processing}},
    pagetotal = 31,
    year =      2020,
    month =     mar,
    day =       9,
    abstract =  {This document specifies enhancements to the Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP) that mitigate security issues in particular use cases. The Echo option enables a CoAP server to verify the freshness of a request or to force a client to demonstrate reachability at its claimed network address; it is now the recommeded way to mitigate amplification attacks. The Request-Tag option allows the CoAP server to match block-wise message fragments belonging to the same request. The update to the client Token processing requirements of RFC 7252 forbids non-secure reuse of Tokens to ensure binding of responses to requests when CoAP is used with security.},
}