Representing Constrained RESTful Environments (CoRE) Link Format in JSON and CBOR
draft-ietf-core-links-json-10
Discuss
No Objection
Warren Kumari
(Alvaro Retana)
(Benoît Claise)
(Deborah Brungard)
(Eric Rescorla)
(Kathleen Moriarty)
(Mirja Kühlewind)
(Spencer Dawkins)
(Suresh Krishnan)
(Terry Manderson)
No Record
Deb Cooley
Erik Kline
Francesca Palombini
Gunter Van de Velde
Jim Guichard
John Scudder
Mahesh Jethanandani
Murray Kucherawy
Orie Steele
Paul Wouters
Roman Danyliw
Zaheduzzaman Sarker
Éric Vyncke
Summary: Needs a YES. Needs 9 more YES or NO OBJECTION positions to pass.
Warren Kumari
No Objection
Deb Cooley
No Record
Erik Kline
No Record
Francesca Palombini
No Record
Gunter Van de Velde
No Record
Jim Guichard
No Record
John Scudder
No Record
Mahesh Jethanandani
No Record
Murray Kucherawy
No Record
Orie Steele
No Record
Paul Wouters
No Record
Roman Danyliw
No Record
Zaheduzzaman Sarker
No Record
Éric Vyncke
No Record
Adam Roach Former IESG member
Discuss
Discuss
[Treat as non-blocking comment]
(2017-04-27 for -08)
Unknown
====================================================================== The protocol has technical flaws that will prevent it from working properly, or the description is unclear in such a way that the reader cannot understand it without ambiguity. ====================================================================== The document requires that the thirteen defined values MUST be encoded as integers. The document does not define what implementations are to do if they receive a CBOR object that does not conform to this encoding: is the parameter ignored? Is the entire link relation ignored? Do you reject the entire collection of link relations? Or do you just go ahead and parse it anyway, since the intended meaning is unambiguous (even if out of spec)? ====================================================================== The draft omits a normative reference necessary for its implementation, or cites such a reference merely informatively rather than normatively. ====================================================================== ISSUE 1: This document appears to use CDDL to define the formal schema for both the JSON and CBOR representations of its data format, although the CDDL document itself is cited only informatively. ISSUE 2: figure 1 shows an application of CDDL to define schema for JSON. It's not clear from a skim through the CDDL document that it can be used for JSON; it would appear that using it in this fashion would require additional text in this document to talk about how to apply CDDL to JSON, or waiting for some other document to do so.
Alexey Melnikov Former IESG member
(was Yes)
Discuss
Discuss
[Treat as non-blocking comment]
(2017-04-27 for -08)
Unknown
A few sentences to address Mark's ARTART Directorate review would be helpful as well. -- this might have been fixed.
Alissa Cooper Former IESG member
Discuss
Discuss
[Treat as non-blocking comment]
(2017-04-26 for -07)
Unknown
I'd like to see the major issue raised by Elwyn in his Gen-ART review resolved before this document proceeds: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-core-links-json-07-genart-lc-davies-2017-04-25/
Alia Atlas Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2017-04-26 for -07)
Unknown
I did notice that " (Comment to be deleted before submitting this document to the IESG: This list should, again, be checked against relevant references at WGLC time.)" under Table 1 wasn't, in fact, deleted. Has the relevant check been made?
Alvaro Retana Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -07)
Unknown
Ben Campbell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2017-04-25 for -07)
Unknown
On a quick email scan, I gather that the discussion thread resulting from Mark's ART-ART review has not completely resolved, at least as of the time I reviewed the document. That probably needs to be resolved prior to progressing the draft.
Benoît Claise Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -08)
Unknown
Deborah Brungard Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -07)
Unknown
Eric Rescorla Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -07)
Unknown
Kathleen Moriarty Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -08)
Unknown
Mirja Kühlewind Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -07)
Unknown
Spencer Dawkins Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -07)
Unknown
Suresh Krishnan Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -07)
Unknown
Terry Manderson Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -07)
Unknown