%% You should probably cite draft-ietf-cose-merkle-tree-proofs-06 instead of this revision.
@techreport{ietf-cose-merkle-tree-proofs-04,
    number =    {draft-ietf-cose-merkle-tree-proofs-04},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cose-merkle-tree-proofs/04/},
    author =    {Orie Steele and Henk Birkholz and Antoine Delignat-Lavaud and Cedric Fournet},
    title =     {{COSE Receipts}},
    pagetotal = 22,
    year =      ,
    month =     ,
    day =       ,
    abstract =  {COSE (CBOR Object Signing and Encryption) Receipts prove properties of a verifiable data structure to a verifier. Verifiable data structures and associated proof types enable security properties, such as minimal disclosure, transparency and non-equivocation. Transparency helps maintain trust over time, and has been applied to certificates, end to end encrypted messaging systems, and supply chain security. This specification enables concise transparency oriented systems, by building on CBOR (Concise Binary Object Representation) and COSE. The extensibility of the approach is demonstrated by providing CBOR encodings for RFC9162.},
}