%% You should probably cite draft-ietf-cose-sphincs-plus-02 instead of this revision.
@techreport{ietf-cose-sphincs-plus-00,
    number =    {draft-ietf-cose-sphincs-plus-00},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cose-sphincs-plus/00/},
    author =    {Michael Prorock and Orie Steele and Rafael Misoczki and Michael Osborne and Christine Cloostermans},
    title =     {{JOSE and COSE Encoding for SPHINCS+}},
    pagetotal = 25,
    year =      2023,
    month =     mar,
    day =       12,
    abstract =  {This document describes JSON and CBOR serializations for SPHINCS+, a Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC) signature suite. This document does not define any new cryptography, only seralizations of existing cryptographic systems. This document registers key types for JOSE and COSE, specifically HASH. Key types in this document are specified by the cryptographic algorithm family in use by a particular algorithm as discussed in RFC7517. This document registers signature algorithms types for JOSE and COSE, specifically SPHINCS+256s and others as required for use of various parameterizations of the SPHINCS+ post-quantum signature scheme.},
}