%% You should probably cite draft-ietf-cose-sphincs-plus-10 instead of this revision.
@techreport{ietf-cose-sphincs-plus-04,
    number =    {draft-ietf-cose-sphincs-plus-04},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cose-sphincs-plus/04/},
    author =    {Michael Prorock and Orie Steele and Rafael Misoczki and Michael Osborne and Christine Cloostermans},
    title =     {{SLH-DSA for JOSE and COSE}},
    pagetotal = 13,
    year =      ,
    month =     ,
    day =       ,
    abstract =  {This document describes JOSE and COSE serializations for SLH-DSA, which was derived from SPHINCS+, a Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC) based digital signature scheme. This document does not define any new cryptography, only seralizations of existing cryptographic systems described in {[}FIPS-205{]}. Note to RFC Editor: This document should not proceed to AUTH48 until NIST completes paramater tuning and selection as a part of the PQC (https://csrc.nist.gov/projects/post-quantum-cryptography) standardization process.},
}