A Common Schema for Internet Registry Information Service Transfer Protocols
draft-ietf-crisp-iris-common-transport-05
Yes
(Ted Hardie)
No Objection
(Bill Fenner)
(Brian Carpenter)
(Dan Romascanu)
(David Kessens)
(Jari Arkko)
(Jon Peterson)
(Lars Eggert)
(Lisa Dusseault)
(Ross Callon)
Abstain
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 05 and is now closed.
Ted Hardie Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Bill Fenner Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Brian Carpenter Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Dan Romascanu Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
David Kessens Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Jon Peterson Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Lars Eggert Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Lisa Dusseault Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Magnus Westerlund Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2007-01-24)
Unknown
Ross Callon Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2007-01-22)
Unknown
Section 4: s/optionalal/optional/ Section 10 should all be one subsection.
Sam Hartman Former IESG member
Abstain
Abstain
(2007-01-22)
Unknown
I don't think this specification provides enough detail that it guarantees interoperable implementations. There is not sufficient mandatory behavior. I also disagree that this spec represents an appropriate decomposition of the problem space. It seems based on textual reuse rather than some abstraction in the problem domain.